Developing a Predictive Model for Ischemic Stroke Onset Time Using Transfer Learning.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
European Neurology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-09 DOI:10.1159/000549892
Yang Du, Shuai Wang, Weidong Wang, Wenming Zhang, Xiang Chen, Yuan Li, Jie Li, Lili Zhang, Xin Ding
{"title":"Developing a Predictive Model for Ischemic Stroke Onset Time Using Transfer Learning.","authors":"Yang Du, Shuai Wang, Weidong Wang, Wenming Zhang, Xiang Chen, Yuan Li, Jie Li, Lili Zhang, Xin Ding","doi":"10.1159/000549892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients within the 4.5-h therapeutic window is critical for therapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences are an approach to determine whether the time since stroke (TSS) is within 4.5 h. However, interobserver variability and limited accuracy are observed in visual assessments. We aimed to develop a transfer learning model for predicting AIS onset within 4.5 h.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 266 AIS patients with known TSS who underwent imaging scans before treatment were retrospectively analyzed, divided into a training set (n = 211) and a validation set (n = 55). The model was built using DWI and FLAIR sequences. After image preprocessing and data augmentation, a 3D ResNet-18 pretrained on the Kinetics dataset was selected and adapted via transfer learning with DWI-FLAIR input. The model performance was compared with human visual assessment, which was based on the DWI-FLAIR mismatch principle. Partial mismatch was defined as hyperintense infarct on DWI with a smaller corresponding hyperintense area on FLAIR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics did not differ between the training and validation sets. On the validation set, the model achieved sensitivity of 0.833 (0.703-0.941), specificity of 0.880 (0.737-1.000), and AUC of 0.929 (0.758-0.935), outperforming human visual assessment (sensitivity 0.767 [0.613-0.903]; specificity 0.360 [0.185-0.560]; AUC 0.563 [0.451-0.693]). For partial DWI-FLAIR mismatch cases, the model correctly classified all 15 cases, whereas humans classified 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 3D ResNet-18 model shows promise in identifying AIS within 4.5 h, including partial DWI-FLAIR mismatch, but requires multicenter validation before use.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"33-44"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000549892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identification of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients within the 4.5-h therapeutic window is critical for therapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences are an approach to determine whether the time since stroke (TSS) is within 4.5 h. However, interobserver variability and limited accuracy are observed in visual assessments. We aimed to develop a transfer learning model for predicting AIS onset within 4.5 h.

Materials and methods: A total of 266 AIS patients with known TSS who underwent imaging scans before treatment were retrospectively analyzed, divided into a training set (n = 211) and a validation set (n = 55). The model was built using DWI and FLAIR sequences. After image preprocessing and data augmentation, a 3D ResNet-18 pretrained on the Kinetics dataset was selected and adapted via transfer learning with DWI-FLAIR input. The model performance was compared with human visual assessment, which was based on the DWI-FLAIR mismatch principle. Partial mismatch was defined as hyperintense infarct on DWI with a smaller corresponding hyperintense area on FLAIR.

Results: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the training and validation sets. On the validation set, the model achieved sensitivity of 0.833 (0.703-0.941), specificity of 0.880 (0.737-1.000), and AUC of 0.929 (0.758-0.935), outperforming human visual assessment (sensitivity 0.767 [0.613-0.903]; specificity 0.360 [0.185-0.560]; AUC 0.563 [0.451-0.693]). For partial DWI-FLAIR mismatch cases, the model correctly classified all 15 cases, whereas humans classified 4.

Conclusion: The 3D ResNet-18 model shows promise in identifying AIS within 4.5 h, including partial DWI-FLAIR mismatch, but requires multicenter validation before use.

利用迁移学习建立缺血性卒中发病时间预测模型。
在4.5小时治疗窗口内识别急性缺血性脑卒中(AIS)患者对治疗至关重要。弥散加权成像(DWI)和流体衰减反演恢复(FLAIR)序列是确定中风后时间(TSS)是否在4.5小时内的一种方法。然而,在视觉评估中观察到观察者之间的差异和有限的准确性。我们的目标是开发一种迁移学习模型来预测4.5小时内AIS的发作。材料与方法回顾性分析266例治疗前接受影像学扫描的已知TSS AIS患者,分为训练组(n = 211)和验证组(n = 55)。采用DWI和FLAIR序列建立模型。经过图像预处理和数据增强后,选择了一个在Kinetics数据集上进行预训练的3D ResNet-18,并通过DWI-FLAIR输入的迁移学习进行调整。将模型性能与基于DWI-FLAIR失配原理的人类视觉评价进行比较。局部不匹配被定义为DWI上的高强度梗死,FLAIR上相应的高强度区域较小。结果基线特征在训练集和验证集之间没有差异。在验证集上,该模型的灵敏度为0.833(0.703-0.941),特异性为0.880 (0.737-1.000),AUC为0.929(0.758-0.935),优于人类视觉评价(灵敏度0.767(0.613-0.903);特异性0.360 (0.185 - -0.560);AUC 0.563(0.451 - -0.693))。对于部分DWI-FLAIR不匹配病例,模型正确分类了所有15例,而人类只正确分类了4例。结论3D ResNet-18模型可以在4.5小时内识别AIS,包括部分DWI-FLAIR不匹配,但需要在使用前进行多中心验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书