Psychosis-proneness is associated with reduced cognitive error-monitoring during instrumental learning

IF 3 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Schizophrenia Research-Cognition Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-02 DOI:10.1016/j.scog.2025.100408
Wanchen Zhao , Samuel D. McDougle , Tyrone D. Cannon
{"title":"Psychosis-proneness is associated with reduced cognitive error-monitoring during instrumental learning","authors":"Wanchen Zhao ,&nbsp;Samuel D. McDougle ,&nbsp;Tyrone D. Cannon","doi":"10.1016/j.scog.2025.100408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>People higher in psychosis-proneness tend to resist belief revision despite contradictory evidence, potentially due to impaired error-monitoring. Post-error slowing (PES), one measure of error-monitoring, is linked to working memory (WM) recruitment. With limited WM capacity, psychosis-proneness could impair belief updating through poor error-monitoring during instrumental learning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>153 participants from Prolific were included in final analyses. To investigate how error-monitoring may explain impaired belief updating among those with psychosis-proneness, we implemented a Visuomotor Reinforcement Learning Task with varying WM loads, Interpretation Inflexibility Task, and Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale – Brief.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Participants with higher positive schizotypy showed less PES at lower loads on the visuomotor instrumental learning task. WM capacity was associated positively with PES but negatively with positive schizotypy. Notably, it is only among participants higher in positive schizotypy that reduced PES associated with more severe belief inflexibility</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These results suggest that impaired top-down error monitoring in psychosis-proneness may stem from WM limitations, leading to greater reliance on slower RL-based learning. This cognitive profile might prevent efficient belief adjustment and error correction, connecting executive function deficits in psychosis-proneness to performance monitoring and cognitive inflexibility.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38119,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100408"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Research-Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2215001325000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People higher in psychosis-proneness tend to resist belief revision despite contradictory evidence, potentially due to impaired error-monitoring. Post-error slowing (PES), one measure of error-monitoring, is linked to working memory (WM) recruitment. With limited WM capacity, psychosis-proneness could impair belief updating through poor error-monitoring during instrumental learning.

Methods

153 participants from Prolific were included in final analyses. To investigate how error-monitoring may explain impaired belief updating among those with psychosis-proneness, we implemented a Visuomotor Reinforcement Learning Task with varying WM loads, Interpretation Inflexibility Task, and Multidimensional Schizotypy Scale – Brief.

Results

Participants with higher positive schizotypy showed less PES at lower loads on the visuomotor instrumental learning task. WM capacity was associated positively with PES but negatively with positive schizotypy. Notably, it is only among participants higher in positive schizotypy that reduced PES associated with more severe belief inflexibility

Conclusions

These results suggest that impaired top-down error monitoring in psychosis-proneness may stem from WM limitations, leading to greater reliance on slower RL-based learning. This cognitive profile might prevent efficient belief adjustment and error correction, connecting executive function deficits in psychosis-proneness to performance monitoring and cognitive inflexibility.
在工具性学习过程中,精神病倾向与认知错误监测减少有关
背景:尽管证据相互矛盾,但精神病倾向较高的人倾向于抵制信念修正,这可能是由于错误监控受损。错误后减缓(PES)是错误监测的一种测量方法,它与工作记忆(WM)的形成有关。在有限的WM能力下,精神病倾向可能会在工具学习过程中由于错误监测不良而损害信念更新。方法对153名来自多产的患者进行最终分析。为了研究错误监测如何解释精神病倾向者的信念更新受损,我们实施了不同WM负荷的视觉运动强化学习任务、解释不灵活性任务和多维分裂型量表。结果高阳性分裂型被试在低负荷的视觉运动工具学习任务上表现出较低的PES。WM能力与PES呈正相关,与阳性分裂型呈负相关。值得注意的是,只有在阳性分裂型较高的参与者中,PES降低与更严重的信念不灵活性相关。结论这些结果表明,精神病倾向中自上而下的错误监测受损可能源于WM限制,导致更多地依赖于较慢的基于rl的学习。这种认知特征可能会阻碍有效的信念调整和错误纠正,将精神病倾向中的执行功能缺陷与绩效监控和认知不灵活性联系起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.70%
发文量
54
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书