Zen Naito MD , Saseem Poudel MD, PhD , Keita Ishido MD, PhD , Yo Kurashima MD, PhD , Yoichi M. Ito MD, PhD , Satoshi Hirano MD, PhD
{"title":"Development of Nontechnical Skills Assessment Tool and The Validation Study for Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair","authors":"Zen Naito MD , Saseem Poudel MD, PhD , Keita Ishido MD, PhD , Yo Kurashima MD, PhD , Yoichi M. Ito MD, PhD , Satoshi Hirano MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Nontechnical skills, such as situational awareness and decision-making, are essential for safe and efficient surgical performance. Although the Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) framework provides a structured approach, it lacks procedure-specific assessment tools. There remains a significant gap in standardized methods for evaluating and training nontechnical skills in specific surgical procedures.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To develop and validate a novel assessment tool, KUDAS-TAPP (Kurashima Decision-making and Situation awareness – Trans Abdominal Preperitoneal approach), specifically designed to evaluate nontechnical skills in the TAPP procedure, focusing on situational awareness and decision-making.</div></div><div><h3>Design and Setting</h3><div>Under the supervision of expert hernia surgeons, we developed the KUDAS-TAPP as an assessment tool for nontechnical skills in TAPP. This tool was used to evaluate 3 groups of surgeons: novices, intermediates, and experts. Participants were assessed by 3 independent raters using the KUDAS-TAPP. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity was examined by comparing scores across experience levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 21 participants (5 novices, 10 intermediates, and 6 experts) from 11 institutions were included. The inter-rater reliability of KUDAS-TAPP was high (ICC = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.84 — 0.96), and internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). The median KUDAS-TAPP scores differed significantly across experience levels (p < 0.01), with significant differences between novices and experts, and intermediates and experts (p < 0.01). KUDAS-TAPP scores correlated strongly with the number of TAPP procedures performed (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.01), as well as with Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH) (ρ = 0.88, p < 0.01) and TAPP checklist scores (ρ = 0.80, p < 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The KUDAS-TAPP is a reliable and valid assessment tool for evaluating situational awareness and decision-making in the TAPP procedure. Its application could enhance surgical education and training by providing a structured framework for assessing and improving nontechnical skills. Future research should explore its effectiveness in training programs and adaptability to other surgical procedures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"83 2","pages":"Article 103799"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425003800","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Nontechnical skills, such as situational awareness and decision-making, are essential for safe and efficient surgical performance. Although the Nontechnical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) framework provides a structured approach, it lacks procedure-specific assessment tools. There remains a significant gap in standardized methods for evaluating and training nontechnical skills in specific surgical procedures.
Objective
To develop and validate a novel assessment tool, KUDAS-TAPP (Kurashima Decision-making and Situation awareness – Trans Abdominal Preperitoneal approach), specifically designed to evaluate nontechnical skills in the TAPP procedure, focusing on situational awareness and decision-making.
Design and Setting
Under the supervision of expert hernia surgeons, we developed the KUDAS-TAPP as an assessment tool for nontechnical skills in TAPP. This tool was used to evaluate 3 groups of surgeons: novices, intermediates, and experts. Participants were assessed by 3 independent raters using the KUDAS-TAPP. Inter-rater reliability was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and construct validity was examined by comparing scores across experience levels.
Results
A total of 21 participants (5 novices, 10 intermediates, and 6 experts) from 11 institutions were included. The inter-rater reliability of KUDAS-TAPP was high (ICC = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) : 0.84 — 0.96), and internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.97). The median KUDAS-TAPP scores differed significantly across experience levels (p < 0.01), with significant differences between novices and experts, and intermediates and experts (p < 0.01). KUDAS-TAPP scores correlated strongly with the number of TAPP procedures performed (ρ = 0.73, p < 0.01), as well as with Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills for Groin Hernia (GOALS-GH) (ρ = 0.88, p < 0.01) and TAPP checklist scores (ρ = 0.80, p < 0.01).
Conclusion
The KUDAS-TAPP is a reliable and valid assessment tool for evaluating situational awareness and decision-making in the TAPP procedure. Its application could enhance surgical education and training by providing a structured framework for assessing and improving nontechnical skills. Future research should explore its effectiveness in training programs and adaptability to other surgical procedures.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.