Evolving land value effects of BRT and MRT: Evidence from Jakarta’s mobility transition

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION
Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-20 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101668
Franco Jauregui-Fung , Tobias Kuhnimhof , Jeffrey Kenworthy
{"title":"Evolving land value effects of BRT and MRT: Evidence from Jakarta’s mobility transition","authors":"Franco Jauregui-Fung ,&nbsp;Tobias Kuhnimhof ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Kenworthy","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2025.101668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Bus rapid transit (BRT) has been widely adopted in emerging economies for its affordability and incremental implementation potential. Yet, many cities are now starting to implement urban rail as a higher-quality mass-transit alternative. This raises the question of the role of existing BRT networks once rail arrives, particularly regarding their land-value effects. This paper examines how BRT-related land value uplift (LVU) evolves after rail begins operation, using Jakarta as a case study. The study analyses residential land values around Transjakarta BRT and MRT Jakarta stations for 2017 (pre-rail) and 2021 (post-rail) using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). The findings reveal that (1) proximity to Transjakarta stations was associated with uplift in 2017, particularly in South Jakarta; (2) by 2021, BRT proximity penalties were reported citywide, especially in the north and east, but also in Central Jakarta; and (3) proximity to MRT Jakarta stations was associated with consistent uplift in 2021, with strongest effects at upgraded interchange nodes in South Jakarta. The timing and spatial coherence of these patterns are consistent with a rail-led substitution mechanism in which urban policy attention and developer actions concentrate willingness-to-pay near rail, while stand-alone BRT corridors increasingly reflect proximity penalties in prices. Policy recommendations include strategic co-location and integration of BRT-MRT stations, mitigating BRT proximity effects with context-sensitive station design, and timely transit-oriented development (TOD) and land value capture (LVC) at integrated hubs to harness value where market signals are strongest.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"23 ","pages":"Article 101668"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X25003050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bus rapid transit (BRT) has been widely adopted in emerging economies for its affordability and incremental implementation potential. Yet, many cities are now starting to implement urban rail as a higher-quality mass-transit alternative. This raises the question of the role of existing BRT networks once rail arrives, particularly regarding their land-value effects. This paper examines how BRT-related land value uplift (LVU) evolves after rail begins operation, using Jakarta as a case study. The study analyses residential land values around Transjakarta BRT and MRT Jakarta stations for 2017 (pre-rail) and 2021 (post-rail) using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR). The findings reveal that (1) proximity to Transjakarta stations was associated with uplift in 2017, particularly in South Jakarta; (2) by 2021, BRT proximity penalties were reported citywide, especially in the north and east, but also in Central Jakarta; and (3) proximity to MRT Jakarta stations was associated with consistent uplift in 2021, with strongest effects at upgraded interchange nodes in South Jakarta. The timing and spatial coherence of these patterns are consistent with a rail-led substitution mechanism in which urban policy attention and developer actions concentrate willingness-to-pay near rail, while stand-alone BRT corridors increasingly reflect proximity penalties in prices. Policy recommendations include strategic co-location and integration of BRT-MRT stations, mitigating BRT proximity effects with context-sensitive station design, and timely transit-oriented development (TOD) and land value capture (LVC) at integrated hubs to harness value where market signals are strongest.
BRT和MRT的土地价值效应演变:来自雅加达交通转型的证据
快速公交(BRT)因其可负担性和增量实施潜力在新兴经济体中被广泛采用。然而,许多城市现在开始实施城市轨道交通,作为一种更高质量的公共交通选择。这就提出了一个问题,即一旦铁路建成,现有BRT网络的作用,特别是考虑到它们对土地价值的影响。本文以雅加达为例,探讨了brt相关的土地价值提升(LVU)在铁路开始运营后的演变。该研究使用普通最小二乘法(OLS)和地理加权回归(GWR)分析了2017年(铁路建成前)和2021年(铁路建成后)雅加达捷运和捷运雅加达站周围的住宅土地价值。研究结果表明:(1)靠近雅加达trans站与2017年的隆升有关,特别是在南雅加达;(2)到2021年,在雅加达全市范围内,特别是在北部和东部,以及雅加达中部,都出现了BRT邻近处罚;(3)邻近雅加达捷运站与2021年的持续抬升有关,在雅加达南部升级的立交节点影响最大。这些模式的时间和空间一致性与铁路主导的替代机制是一致的,在这种机制中,城市政策的关注和开发商的行动集中在铁路附近的支付意愿,而独立的BRT走廊越来越多地反映了价格的邻近惩罚。政策建议包括BRT- mrt站点的战略性共址和整合,通过环境敏感型站点设计减轻BRT邻近效应,以及及时在综合枢纽进行以交通为导向的开发(TOD)和土地价值获取(LVC),以利用市场信号最强烈的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书