Participants' Perspective on the Competence of Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching: Development and Validation of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions-Participants' Assessment of Teaching (MBI:PAT) Questionnaire.

IF 3.5 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Mindfulness Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8
Jesus Montero-Marin, Eleanor-Rose Farley, Shannon Maloney, Rebecca Crane, Paul D'Alton, Rebecca Eldridge, Fabio Giommi, Gemma Griffith, Frederick M Hecht, Verena Hinze, Eric B Loucks, Clara Strauss, Laura Taylor, Ruth Baer, Willem Kuyken
{"title":"Participants' Perspective on the Competence of Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching: Development and Validation of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions-Participants' Assessment of Teaching (MBI:PAT) Questionnaire.","authors":"Jesus Montero-Marin, Eleanor-Rose Farley, Shannon Maloney, Rebecca Crane, Paul D'Alton, Rebecca Eldridge, Fabio Giommi, Gemma Griffith, Frederick M Hecht, Verena Hinze, Eric B Loucks, Clara Strauss, Laura Taylor, Ruth Baer, Willem Kuyken","doi":"10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>No participant-rated tool exists for assessing MBI teaching competence. This study aimed to develop and validate the MBI:PAT to address this limitation. The primary objective was to develop a new measure, the Mindfulness-based Interventions: Participants' Assessment of Teaching\" (MBI:PAT), and to evaluate its psychometric properties across several studies using independent samples.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The MBI:PAT was based on a theoretically and empirically supported operational definition of teaching competence and comprised 24 key features across the domains of coverage, pacing, and organization; relational skills; embodying mindfulness; guiding mindfulness practices; conveying course themes through interactive inquiry and didactic teaching; and holding the group's learning environment. Across five studies, items were generated, refined, and validated using independent samples to assess factor structure, reliability, and validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Findings support a 24-item questionnaire, with excellent internal consistency (<i>ω</i> = 0.99) and construct, convergent, and divergent validity, with a one-factor structure (CFI = 1.00; TLI = 1.00; RMSEA = 0.04, 90% CI [0.03, 0.05]; SRMR = 0.03). The measure demonstrates robust invariance across age and gender.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MBI:PAT provides a psychometrically robust measure of MBI teaching competence from participants' perspective that can be used in teaching, training and research. Future research is needed to explore its performance across a wider range of teaching competence, and its relationship to key process and outcome variables.</p><p><strong>Pre-registration: </strong>Sub-study (5) was pre-registered (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05154266).</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8.</p>","PeriodicalId":18523,"journal":{"name":"Mindfulness","volume":"16 10","pages":"2825-2844"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12660462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mindfulness","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: No participant-rated tool exists for assessing MBI teaching competence. This study aimed to develop and validate the MBI:PAT to address this limitation. The primary objective was to develop a new measure, the Mindfulness-based Interventions: Participants' Assessment of Teaching" (MBI:PAT), and to evaluate its psychometric properties across several studies using independent samples.

Method: The MBI:PAT was based on a theoretically and empirically supported operational definition of teaching competence and comprised 24 key features across the domains of coverage, pacing, and organization; relational skills; embodying mindfulness; guiding mindfulness practices; conveying course themes through interactive inquiry and didactic teaching; and holding the group's learning environment. Across five studies, items were generated, refined, and validated using independent samples to assess factor structure, reliability, and validity.

Results: Findings support a 24-item questionnaire, with excellent internal consistency (ω = 0.99) and construct, convergent, and divergent validity, with a one-factor structure (CFI = 1.00; TLI = 1.00; RMSEA = 0.04, 90% CI [0.03, 0.05]; SRMR = 0.03). The measure demonstrates robust invariance across age and gender.

Conclusions: The MBI:PAT provides a psychometrically robust measure of MBI teaching competence from participants' perspective that can be used in teaching, training and research. Future research is needed to explore its performance across a wider range of teaching competence, and its relationship to key process and outcome variables.

Pre-registration: Sub-study (5) was pre-registered (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05154266).

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8.

参与者对正念干预教学能力的看法:正念干预-参与者教学评价问卷的编制与验证
目的:不存在评估MBI教学能力的参与者评价工具。本研究旨在开发和验证MBI:PAT来解决这一限制。本研究的主要目标是开发一种新的测量方法,即“基于正念的干预:参与者的教学评估”(MBI:PAT),并通过几项使用独立样本的研究来评估其心理测量特性。方法:MBI:PAT基于理论和经验支持的教学能力可操作性定义,包括涵盖范围、节奏和组织等领域的24个关键特征;关系技能;体现正念;指导正念练习;通过互动式探究和说教式教学来传达课程主题;保持小组的学习环境。在五项研究中,项目被生成、提炼并使用独立样本进行验证,以评估因素结构、信度和效度。结果:问卷共24项,具有良好的内部一致性(ω = 0.99),结构效度、收敛效度和发散效度均为单因素结构(CFI = 1.00; TLI = 1.00; RMSEA = 0.04, 90% CI [0.03, 0.05]; SRMR = 0.03)。该指标显示了跨年龄和性别的强大不变性。结论:MBI:PAT从参与者的角度对MBI教学能力进行了心理测量,可用于教学、培训和研究。未来的研究需要探索它在更广泛的教学能力范围内的表现,以及它与关键过程和结果变量的关系。预注册:子研究(5)已预注册(ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05154266)。补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,下载地址:10.1007/s12671-025-02668-8。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mindfulness
Mindfulness Multiple-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
19.40%
发文量
224
期刊介绍: Mindfulness seeks to advance research, clinical practice, and theory on mindfulness. It is interested in manuscripts from diverse viewpoints, including psychology, psychiatry, medicine, neurobiology, psychoneuroendocrinology, cognitive, behavioral, cultural, philosophy, spirituality, and wisdom traditions. Mindfulness encourages research submissions on the reliability and validity of assessment of mindfulness; clinical uses of mindfulness in psychological distress, psychiatric disorders, and medical conditions; alleviation of personal and societal suffering; the nature and foundations of mindfulness; mechanisms of action; and the use of mindfulness across cultures. The Journal also seeks to promote the use of mindfulness by publishing scholarly papers on the training of clinicians, institutional staff, teachers, parents, and industry personnel in mindful provision of services. Examples of topics include: Mindfulness-based psycho-educational interventions for children with learning, emotional, and behavioral disorders Treating depression and clinical symptoms in patients with chronic heart failure Yoga and mindfulness Cognitive-behavioral mindfulness group therapy interventions Mindfulnessness and emotional regulation difficulties in children Loving-kindness meditation to increase social connectedness Training for parents and children with ADHD Recovery from substance abuse Changing parents’ mindfulness Child management skills Treating childhood anxiety and depression
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书