Nonmedical Use of Prescription Opioids: Use to Experience Subjective Effects Versus Other Nonmedical Use Among Adults in Ontario, Canada From 2020 to 2024.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-22 DOI:10.15288/jsad.25-00213
Yeshambel T Nigatu, Samantha Wells, Leslie Buckley, Lena C Quilty, Nikki Bozinoff, Farihah Ali, Sameer Imtiaz, Hayley A Hamilton
{"title":"Nonmedical Use of Prescription Opioids: Use to Experience Subjective Effects Versus Other Nonmedical Use Among Adults in Ontario, Canada From 2020 to 2024.","authors":"Yeshambel T Nigatu, Samantha Wells, Leslie Buckley, Lena C Quilty, Nikki Bozinoff, Farihah Ali, Sameer Imtiaz, Hayley A Hamilton","doi":"10.15288/jsad.25-00213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The opioid crisis remains an important public health concern, with nonmedical use of prescription opioids (NMUPO) playing a significant role. However, limited evidence exists on how adults engaging in NMUPO for subjective effects differ from those who use them for other nonmedical reasons. This study aims to identify and examine factors associated with engagement in NMUPO for subjective effects.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were from the 2020 to 2024 CAMH Monitor study, a repeated cross-sectional survey of adults age 18 and older (<i>N</i> = 7,655). The surveys used a Qualtrics-based web survey to assess NMUPO, sociodemographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Data were analyzed using multivariate multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>About 3% of adults engaged in NMUPO for subjective effects/to get high, and 15% of participants engaged in NMUPO for other nonmedical purposes during 2020 and 2024. These percentages remained stable over the years. The risk of NMUPO for subjective effects, compared with NMUPO for other purposes, was significantly higher among Asian people compared with their White counterparts (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.80, 95% CI [1.08, 3.01]) and among those with children (RRR = 2.53, 95% CI [1.64, 3.92]). Similarly, individuals with low household income, current other substance use, and psychological distress exhibited a higher risk of NMUPO, after adjusting for covariates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Individuals who use prescription opioids nonmedically for subjective effects or other reasons differ by race/ethnicity, parental status, income, substance use, and level of psychological distress. These findings suggest the need for targeted prevention and intervention strategies to address the unique needs and behaviors of different user groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":"831-839"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.25-00213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The opioid crisis remains an important public health concern, with nonmedical use of prescription opioids (NMUPO) playing a significant role. However, limited evidence exists on how adults engaging in NMUPO for subjective effects differ from those who use them for other nonmedical reasons. This study aims to identify and examine factors associated with engagement in NMUPO for subjective effects.

Method: Data were from the 2020 to 2024 CAMH Monitor study, a repeated cross-sectional survey of adults age 18 and older (N = 7,655). The surveys used a Qualtrics-based web survey to assess NMUPO, sociodemographic factors, substance use, and mental health. Data were analyzed using multivariate multinomial logistic regression.

Results: About 3% of adults engaged in NMUPO for subjective effects/to get high, and 15% of participants engaged in NMUPO for other nonmedical purposes during 2020 and 2024. These percentages remained stable over the years. The risk of NMUPO for subjective effects, compared with NMUPO for other purposes, was significantly higher among Asian people compared with their White counterparts (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.80, 95% CI [1.08, 3.01]) and among those with children (RRR = 2.53, 95% CI [1.64, 3.92]). Similarly, individuals with low household income, current other substance use, and psychological distress exhibited a higher risk of NMUPO, after adjusting for covariates.

Conclusions: Individuals who use prescription opioids nonmedically for subjective effects or other reasons differ by race/ethnicity, parental status, income, substance use, and level of psychological distress. These findings suggest the need for targeted prevention and intervention strategies to address the unique needs and behaviors of different user groups.

处方阿片类药物的非医疗使用:用于体验主观效果与其他非医疗使用在加拿大安大略省,从2020年到2024年。
目的:阿片类药物危机仍然是一个重要的公共卫生问题,处方阿片类药物的非医疗使用(NMUPO)发挥着重要作用。然而,有限的证据表明,出于主观影响而使用NMUPO的成年人与出于其他非医疗原因使用NMUPO的成年人有何不同。本研究旨在确定并检验与NMUPO参与相关的主观影响因素。方法:数据来自2020年至2024年CAMH监测研究,这是一项对18岁及以上成年人的重复横断面调查(N= 7655)。这些调查使用了基于质量的网络调查来评估NMUPO、社会人口因素、药物使用和心理健康。数据分析采用多元多项式逻辑回归。结果:2020年至2024年期间,约3%的成年人参与NMUPO是为了达到主观效果/获得快感,15%的参与者参与NMUPO是为了其他非医疗目的。这些百分比多年来保持稳定。与其他目的的NMUPO相比,主观影响的NMUPO风险在亚洲人群中显著高于白人(相对风险比,RRR=1.80, 95%CI: 1.08-3.01)和有孩子的人群(RRR=2.53, 95%CI: 1.64-3.92)。同样,在调整协变量后,家庭收入低、目前使用其他物质和心理困扰的个体表现出更高的NMUPO风险。结论:出于主观影响或其他原因使用处方阿片类药物的个体因种族/民族、父母状况、收入、物质使用和心理困扰程度而异。这些发现表明,需要有针对性的预防和干预策略,以解决不同用户群体的独特需求和行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书