The effects of MEP counts on intra- and intersession reliability of single-pulse TMS-induced MEPs in the wrist extensor muscle of healthy individuals

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Journal of Neuroscience Methods Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110621
Hamed Alanazi , Prue Morgan , Shapour Jaberzadeh
{"title":"The effects of MEP counts on intra- and intersession reliability of single-pulse TMS-induced MEPs in the wrist extensor muscle of healthy individuals","authors":"Hamed Alanazi ,&nbsp;Prue Morgan ,&nbsp;Shapour Jaberzadeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2025.110621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) exhibit high intra-individual variability, which can compromise reliability. One suggested approach to reduce this variability is averaging multiple MEPs. However, there is no evidence regarding the optimal number of MEPs required to obtain the most reliable amplitude and latency measurements from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle.</div></div><div><h3>New method</h3><div>Healthy participants attended two sessions. In the first session, two sets of TMS-induced MEPs were recorded with a 20-minute interval to evaluate intra-session reliability. The second session was conducted after at least 48 h to assess inter-session reliability. Reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), one-way ANOVA, and Bland–Altman analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For MEP amplitude, both intra- and inter-session ICC values were excellent across all MEP block sizes, with reliability improving as the number of MEPs per block increased. For MEP latency, 10 MEPs were sufficient to achieve excellent intra-session reliability, whereas inter-session reliability ranged from good to excellent, with larger blocks (16–25 MEPs) providing the highest ICC values.</div></div><div><h3>Comparison with existing methods</h3><div>This study is the first to examine MEP reliability in the ECR muscle. Compared with previous methods, including monophasic TMS in other muscles, our protocol shows that MEP latency in the ECR requires larger MEP blocks to achieve high inter-session reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study suggests that averaging MEPs from the ECR yields highly reproducible amplitude measurements with few blocks, whereas MEP latency requires more blocks to achieve high inter-session reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":"425 ","pages":"Article 110621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165027025002651","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) exhibit high intra-individual variability, which can compromise reliability. One suggested approach to reduce this variability is averaging multiple MEPs. However, there is no evidence regarding the optimal number of MEPs required to obtain the most reliable amplitude and latency measurements from the extensor carpi radialis (ECR) muscle.

New method

Healthy participants attended two sessions. In the first session, two sets of TMS-induced MEPs were recorded with a 20-minute interval to evaluate intra-session reliability. The second session was conducted after at least 48 h to assess inter-session reliability. Reliability was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), one-way ANOVA, and Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

For MEP amplitude, both intra- and inter-session ICC values were excellent across all MEP block sizes, with reliability improving as the number of MEPs per block increased. For MEP latency, 10 MEPs were sufficient to achieve excellent intra-session reliability, whereas inter-session reliability ranged from good to excellent, with larger blocks (16–25 MEPs) providing the highest ICC values.

Comparison with existing methods

This study is the first to examine MEP reliability in the ECR muscle. Compared with previous methods, including monophasic TMS in other muscles, our protocol shows that MEP latency in the ECR requires larger MEP blocks to achieve high inter-session reliability.

Conclusions

This study suggests that averaging MEPs from the ECR yields highly reproducible amplitude measurements with few blocks, whereas MEP latency requires more blocks to achieve high inter-session reliability.
MEP计数对健康个体单脉冲tms诱导的腕伸肌MEP的内、间歇可靠性的影响
背景:运动诱发电位(MEPs)表现出高度的个体内变异性,这可能会损害可靠性。减少这种可变性的一种建议方法是对多个mep取平均值。然而,对于获得桡侧腕伸肌(ECR)最可靠的振幅和潜伏期测量所需的最佳mep数量,尚无证据。新方法:健康参与者参加两次会议。在第一个会话中,记录两组tms诱发的mep,间隔20分钟,以评估会话内可靠性。第二次测试在至少48小时后进行,以评估测试间的可靠性。信度采用类内相关系数(ICCs)、单因素方差分析和Bland-Altman分析进行量化。结果:对于MEP振幅,在所有MEP块大小中,会话内和会话间的ICC值都很好,随着每个MEP块数量的增加,可靠性也在提高。对于MEP延迟,10个MEP足以实现出色的会话内可靠性,而会话间可靠性范围从良好到优秀,较大的块(16-25个MEP)提供最高的ICC值。与现有方法的比较:本研究首次检验了ECR肌MEP的可靠性。与以前的方法(包括其他肌肉的单相经颅磁刺激)相比,我们的方案表明,ECR中的MEP延迟需要更大的MEP块来实现高会话间可靠性。结论:本研究表明,从ECR中平均MEP可以产生高度可重复的振幅测量,只需很少的块,而MEP延迟需要更多的块来实现高会话间可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
Journal of Neuroscience Methods 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
226
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书