Measuring early experiences: Challenges and future directions

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-25 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101637
Kathryn L. Humphreys, Lucy S. King
{"title":"Measuring early experiences: Challenges and future directions","authors":"Kathryn L. Humphreys,&nbsp;Lucy S. King","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The brain’s remarkable plasticity during early development makes it highly responsive to environmental input, with early experiences having lasting effects on functioning and development. Both adversity and variations in normative caregiving experiences influence developmental trajectories. Accurately assessing these diverse experiences is crucial for understanding their role in shaping brain development, yet current measurement approaches face significant challenges that limit our ability to capture the complex, multidimensional nature of children's environmental exposures. This review examines seven key challenges in measuring early experiences: (1) Conflation of exposure and response, (2) Oversimplification of complex experiences, (3) Informant bias and reliability issues, (4) Biomarker overinterpretation and inferential leaps, (5) Limited ecological validity, (6) Genetic confounding, and (7) Limited generalizability across cultures and communities. We discuss how these limitations constrain our understanding of how diverse early experiences shape brain development and propose evidence-based approaches to address each challenge. Emerging frameworks that distinguish between different dimensions of adversity, technological advances in passive monitoring, and genetically-informed research designs offer promising paths forward. By advancing precise, high-dimensional approaches to measuring early experiences, researchers can improve understanding of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes while addressing questions of practical significance in education, mental health, and social policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101637"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325001331","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain’s remarkable plasticity during early development makes it highly responsive to environmental input, with early experiences having lasting effects on functioning and development. Both adversity and variations in normative caregiving experiences influence developmental trajectories. Accurately assessing these diverse experiences is crucial for understanding their role in shaping brain development, yet current measurement approaches face significant challenges that limit our ability to capture the complex, multidimensional nature of children's environmental exposures. This review examines seven key challenges in measuring early experiences: (1) Conflation of exposure and response, (2) Oversimplification of complex experiences, (3) Informant bias and reliability issues, (4) Biomarker overinterpretation and inferential leaps, (5) Limited ecological validity, (6) Genetic confounding, and (7) Limited generalizability across cultures and communities. We discuss how these limitations constrain our understanding of how diverse early experiences shape brain development and propose evidence-based approaches to address each challenge. Emerging frameworks that distinguish between different dimensions of adversity, technological advances in passive monitoring, and genetically-informed research designs offer promising paths forward. By advancing precise, high-dimensional approaches to measuring early experiences, researchers can improve understanding of fundamental neurodevelopmental processes while addressing questions of practical significance in education, mental health, and social policy.
衡量早期经验:挑战和未来方向。
大脑在早期发育阶段的显著可塑性使其对环境输入的反应高度敏感,早期的经历对功能和发育有持久的影响。逆境和规范照料经验的变化都会影响发育轨迹。准确评估这些不同的经历对于理解它们在塑造大脑发育中的作用至关重要,但目前的测量方法面临着重大挑战,限制了我们捕捉儿童环境暴露的复杂、多维性质的能力。本综述探讨了测量早期经验的七个关键挑战:(1)暴露和反应的合并,(2)复杂经验的过度简化,(3)信息偏差和可靠性问题,(4)生物标记物的过度解释和推断飞跃,(5)有限的生态有效性,(6)遗传混淆,以及(7)有限的跨文化和社区的普遍性。我们讨论了这些限制如何限制我们对不同早期经历如何影响大脑发育的理解,并提出了基于证据的方法来解决每个挑战。新兴的框架区分了逆境的不同维度、被动监测的技术进步和基因知情的研究设计,为未来提供了有希望的道路。通过推进精确、高维的方法来测量早期经验,研究人员可以提高对基本神经发育过程的理解,同时解决教育、心理健康和社会政策方面的实际意义问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书