Starlings solve the ephemeral reward task.

IF 0.9 4区 心理学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Marco Vasconcelos, Guilherme Hoffmann, Cyrus Kirkman, Aaron P Blaisdell, Armando Machado
{"title":"Starlings solve the ephemeral reward task.","authors":"Marco Vasconcelos, Guilherme Hoffmann, Cyrus Kirkman, Aaron P Blaisdell, Armando Machado","doi":"10.1037/xan0000415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the ephemeral reward task, animals are presented with two choice alternatives, one optimal, the other suboptimal. Choosing the suboptimal alternative delivers one immediate reward and ends the trial, whereas choosing the optimal alternative also yields one immediate reward but allows subsequent access to the reward associated with the suboptimal alternative. While species such as cleaner wrasse and grey parrots excel at this task, others-including pigeons, primates, and rats-struggle, raising questions about the factors influencing success. This study investigated these factors by examining performance in starlings under standard and modified task conditions. Across two experiments, starlings successfully learned to prefer the optimal option. In these experiments, we occasionally included single-option trials, which allowed birds to experience the outcomes of each choice in isolation. In Experiment 2, we also manipulated the delay between the two sequential rewards to test its effect on performance. Preference for the optimal option declined as the delay increased, suggesting that shorter delays facilitate credit assignment to the initial choice. We hypothesize that shorter delays facilitate the association between initial choices and subsequent rewards and that differences in apparatus, intertrial intervals, and the rate of memory decay may also influence performance in the task. Overall, our results highlight the complexity of the ephemeral reward task and suggest the potential interplay of ecological relevance and task design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":54259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","volume":" ","pages":"37-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xan0000415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the ephemeral reward task, animals are presented with two choice alternatives, one optimal, the other suboptimal. Choosing the suboptimal alternative delivers one immediate reward and ends the trial, whereas choosing the optimal alternative also yields one immediate reward but allows subsequent access to the reward associated with the suboptimal alternative. While species such as cleaner wrasse and grey parrots excel at this task, others-including pigeons, primates, and rats-struggle, raising questions about the factors influencing success. This study investigated these factors by examining performance in starlings under standard and modified task conditions. Across two experiments, starlings successfully learned to prefer the optimal option. In these experiments, we occasionally included single-option trials, which allowed birds to experience the outcomes of each choice in isolation. In Experiment 2, we also manipulated the delay between the two sequential rewards to test its effect on performance. Preference for the optimal option declined as the delay increased, suggesting that shorter delays facilitate credit assignment to the initial choice. We hypothesize that shorter delays facilitate the association between initial choices and subsequent rewards and that differences in apparatus, intertrial intervals, and the rate of memory decay may also influence performance in the task. Overall, our results highlight the complexity of the ephemeral reward task and suggest the potential interplay of ecological relevance and task design. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

欧椋鸟解决了短暂的奖励任务。
在短暂奖励任务中,动物们有两个选择,一个是最优的,另一个是次优的。选择次优方案将获得一个即时奖励并结束试验,而选择最优方案也将获得一个即时奖励,但允许随后获得与次优方案相关的奖励。虽然像濑鱼和灰鹦鹉这样的物种擅长这项任务,但其他物种——包括鸽子、灵长类动物和老鼠——却很挣扎,这就提出了影响成功因素的问题。本研究通过观察椋鸟在标准和修正任务条件下的表现来研究这些因素。在两次实验中,椋鸟成功地学会了选择最优选择。在这些实验中,我们偶尔会加入单选项试验,让鸟类单独体验每个选择的结果。在实验2中,我们还操纵了两个连续奖励之间的延迟,以测试其对性能的影响。对最优选择的偏好随着延迟的增加而下降,这表明较短的延迟有利于对初始选择的信用分配。我们假设,较短的延迟促进了初始选择和随后奖励之间的联系,而设备、间隔时间和记忆衰退速度的差异也可能影响任务中的表现。总的来说,我们的研究结果强调了短暂奖励任务的复杂性,并提出了生态相关性和任务设计的潜在相互作用。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition
Journal of Experimental Psychology-Animal Learning and Cognition Psychology-Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
23.10%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition publishes experimental and theoretical studies concerning all aspects of animal behavior processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书