Competency-Based Simulation Training for Procedural Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Julia H Vermylen, Elaine R Cohen, David A Cook, William C McGaghie, S Barry Issenberg, Jason Arnold, Heather Ballard, Mohammad Bayoumi, Molly Beestrum, Remy Bremner, Scott Crawford, Noah Einstein, Candace Mannarino, Asit Misra, Tadaki M Tomita, Heidi Waldron, Frank Yanko, David O Kessler
{"title":"Competency-Based Simulation Training for Procedural Skills: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Julia H Vermylen, Elaine R Cohen, David A Cook, William C McGaghie, S Barry Issenberg, Jason Arnold, Heather Ballard, Mohammad Bayoumi, Molly Beestrum, Remy Bremner, Scott Crawford, Noah Einstein, Candace Mannarino, Asit Misra, Tadaki M Tomita, Heidi Waldron, Frank Yanko, David O Kessler","doi":"10.1097/SIH.0000000000000895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Summary statement: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of competency-based simulation education for medical procedural skills, encompassing a diverse range of healthcare domains and professions. Meta-analysis showed competency-based simulation is more effective than noncompetency-based simulation for skill outcomes (large effect). Outcomes are favorable, but small, for behaviors in practice and patient effects. Specific instructional design features examining different simulators and different types and sources of feedback were common themes identified among studies though no instructional design features were found to have significant impact on skill acquisition. This review also identified significant gaps in research including a lack of standardized terminology and reporting methods as well as a limited number of studies assessing the impact on behaviors in practice and patient effects. This study contributes to the ongoing evidence to support competency-based simulation training and highlights the need for further research to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of training of healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":49517,"journal":{"name":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","volume":" ","pages":"231-240"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13412366/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation in Healthcare-Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary statement: We conducted a systematic review of competency-based simulation education for medical procedural skills, encompassing a diverse range of healthcare domains and professions. Meta-analysis showed competency-based simulation is more effective than noncompetency-based simulation for skill outcomes (large effect). Outcomes are favorable, but small, for behaviors in practice and patient effects. Specific instructional design features examining different simulators and different types and sources of feedback were common themes identified among studies though no instructional design features were found to have significant impact on skill acquisition. This review also identified significant gaps in research including a lack of standardized terminology and reporting methods as well as a limited number of studies assessing the impact on behaviors in practice and patient effects. This study contributes to the ongoing evidence to support competency-based simulation training and highlights the need for further research to enhance the efficacy and efficiency of training of healthcare professionals.

基于能力的程序性技能模拟训练:系统回顾与元分析。
摘要声明:我们对基于能力的医学程序技能模拟教育进行了系统回顾,涵盖了各种医疗保健领域和专业。元分析表明,基于能力的模拟比基于非能力的模拟对技能结果更有效(大效应)。结果是有利的,但对于实践中的行为和患者的影响来说,效果很小。具体的教学设计特征检查不同的模拟器和不同类型和来源的反馈是研究中确定的共同主题,尽管没有发现教学设计特征对技能习得有显著影响。本综述还发现了研究中的重大差距,包括缺乏标准化的术语和报告方法,以及评估对实践行为和患者影响的研究数量有限。本研究为支持基于能力的模拟培训提供了持续的证据,并强调了进一步研究以提高医疗保健专业人员培训的功效和效率的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.30%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare is a multidisciplinary publication encompassing all areas of applications and research in healthcare simulation technology. The journal is relevant to a broad range of clinical and biomedical specialties, and publishes original basic, clinical, and translational research on these topics and more: Safety and quality-oriented training programs; Development of educational and competency assessment standards; Reports of experience in the use of simulation technology; Virtual reality; Epidemiologic modeling; Molecular, pharmacologic, and disease modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书