Comparison of Risk Factors and Outcomes in Pediatric Posterior and Anterior Circulation Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

IF 1 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Iranian Journal of Child Neurology Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.22037/ijcn.v19i4.47324
Amirreza Jahanshahi, Mahsa Niknam, Sina Raeisi, Shahram Sadeghvand, Sepehr Mahmoudi Azar, Atiyeh Ghassemi, Khatereh Rezazadeh
{"title":"Comparison of Risk Factors and Outcomes in Pediatric Posterior and Anterior Circulation Arterial Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.","authors":"Amirreza Jahanshahi, Mahsa Niknam, Sina Raeisi, Shahram Sadeghvand, Sepehr Mahmoudi Azar, Atiyeh Ghassemi, Khatereh Rezazadeh","doi":"10.22037/ijcn.v19i4.47324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a rare but serious condition leading to significant neurological disability. AIS is classified into anterior circulation AIS (ACAIS) and posterior circulation AIS (PCAIS). Understanding the differences between these subtypes is essential for early diagnosis and effective management. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of pediatric ACAIS and PCAIS, focusing on lipid profiles, prothrombotic factors, and SARS-CoV-2 prevalence.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 34 children diagnosed with AIS at the Tabriz Children's Hospital from March 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into ACAIS, PCAIS, and mixed, involving both anterior and posterior circulations based on neuroimaging findings. Demographic data, medical history, and laboratory parameters, including coagulation factors, lipid profiles, and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using SPSS version 26, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 34 patients, 73.5% were diagnosed with ACAIS, 20.6% with PCAIS, and 5.9% with both. PCAIS patients were older (median age: 8.0 vs. 2.0 years), and sex distribution varied, although not significantly. No significant differences were found in lipid profiles, coagulation factors, or SARS-CoV-2 prevalence between ACAIS and PCAIS groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>No significant differences in demographic features, lipid profiles, or prothrombotic conditions were observed between ACAIS and PCAIS, suggesting that pediatric stroke mechanisms may differ from those in adults. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and improve pediatric stroke management.</p>","PeriodicalId":14537,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","volume":"19 4","pages":"73-79"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12593127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Child Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22037/ijcn.v19i4.47324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pediatric arterial ischemic stroke (AIS) is a rare but serious condition leading to significant neurological disability. AIS is classified into anterior circulation AIS (ACAIS) and posterior circulation AIS (PCAIS). Understanding the differences between these subtypes is essential for early diagnosis and effective management. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics of pediatric ACAIS and PCAIS, focusing on lipid profiles, prothrombotic factors, and SARS-CoV-2 prevalence.

Materials & methods: A descriptive-analytical cross-sectional study was conducted on 34 children diagnosed with AIS at the Tabriz Children's Hospital from March 2020 to October 2021. Patients were categorized into ACAIS, PCAIS, and mixed, involving both anterior and posterior circulations based on neuroimaging findings. Demographic data, medical history, and laboratory parameters, including coagulation factors, lipid profiles, and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, were analyzed. Statistical comparisons were performed using SPSS version 26, with a p-value of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: Among the 34 patients, 73.5% were diagnosed with ACAIS, 20.6% with PCAIS, and 5.9% with both. PCAIS patients were older (median age: 8.0 vs. 2.0 years), and sex distribution varied, although not significantly. No significant differences were found in lipid profiles, coagulation factors, or SARS-CoV-2 prevalence between ACAIS and PCAIS groups.

Conclusion: No significant differences in demographic features, lipid profiles, or prothrombotic conditions were observed between ACAIS and PCAIS, suggesting that pediatric stroke mechanisms may differ from those in adults. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and improve pediatric stroke management.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

儿童后、前循环动脉缺血性卒中的危险因素和预后比较:一项横断面分析。
目的:小儿动脉缺血性脑卒中(AIS)是一种罕见但严重的疾病,可导致严重的神经功能障碍。AIS分为前循环AIS (ACAIS)和后循环AIS (PCAIS)。了解这些亚型之间的差异对于早期诊断和有效管理至关重要。本研究旨在评估儿童ACAIS和PCAIS的人口统计学、临床和实验室特征,重点关注脂质谱、血栓形成前因子和SARS-CoV-2患病率。材料与方法:对2020年3月至2021年10月在大不里士儿童医院诊断为AIS的34名儿童进行了描述性分析横断面研究。患者根据神经影像学结果分为ACAIS、PCAIS和混合型,包括前循环和后循环。分析了人口统计数据、病史和实验室参数,包括凝血因子、脂质谱和SARS-CoV-2抗体。采用SPSS version 26进行统计学比较,p值为Results: 34例患者中,73.5%诊断为ACAIS, 20.6%诊断为PCAIS, 5.9%诊断为两者兼有。PCAIS患者年龄较大(中位年龄:8.0岁vs. 2.0岁),性别分布差异较大,但差异不显著。ACAIS组和PCAIS组在脂质谱、凝血因子或SARS-CoV-2患病率方面未发现显著差异。结论:ACAIS和PCAIS在人口统计学特征、脂质谱或血栓形成前状况方面没有显著差异,这表明儿童卒中机制可能与成人不同。需要进一步的大规模研究来验证这些发现并改善儿童卒中管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书