Integrated in silico and in vitro assessment of estrogen and androgen receptor activity of 10 selected PFAS within an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA)
Darlene Mae D. Ortiz , Handule Lee , Ngoc Minh-Hong Hoang , Hyun Jun Lee , Jinhee Choi , Kwangsik Park
{"title":"Integrated in silico and in vitro assessment of estrogen and androgen receptor activity of 10 selected PFAS within an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA)","authors":"Darlene Mae D. Ortiz , Handule Lee , Ngoc Minh-Hong Hoang , Hyun Jun Lee , Jinhee Choi , Kwangsik Park","doi":"10.1016/j.taap.2025.117628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The potential of <em>per</em>- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to disrupt endocrine systems continues to be a regulatory concern. However, effectively prioritizing these structurally diverse chemicals remains challenging due to inconsistencies in predictive and experimental data. In this study, we employed a multi-tiered evaluation strategy that combines <em>in silico</em> modeling, <em>in vitro</em> assays, and curated mechanistic data within the OECD's Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) framework. Molecular docking using AutoDock Vina, CB-Dock2, and Endocrine Disruptome consistently revealed strong binding affinities of long-chain PFAS, particularly PFDA, PFOA, and 10:2 FTOH, to estrogen and androgen receptors. These predictions were corroborated by ER and AR transactivation assays (OECD TG 455/458), which demonstrated ER agonist and AR antagonist activity for the same compounds. In contrast, short-chain and sulfonated PFAS (PFHxA, PFBS, PFOS) exhibited limited to no activity across platforms. To enhance the biological relevance of the prioritization, we compiled supporting mechanistic evidence by applying the IATA framework to organize data along the adverse outcome pathway from molecular initiating events, through key events, to predicted adverse outcomes. Literature-reported alterations in steroidogenic enzymes and hormone levels were included to enrich mechanistic depth. All lines of evidences were systematically integrated into a weight-of-evidence matrix, enabling a transparent and biologically plausible ranking of PFAS based on receptor interaction, functional activity, and endocrine-disruptive potential. This combined approach identified PFDA and PFOA as high-priority endocrine disruptors and offers a scalable, non-<em>in vivo</em> strategy for the screening and risk-based prioritization of environmentally persistent chemicals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23174,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","volume":"506 ","pages":"Article 117628"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology and applied pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X25004041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The potential of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) to disrupt endocrine systems continues to be a regulatory concern. However, effectively prioritizing these structurally diverse chemicals remains challenging due to inconsistencies in predictive and experimental data. In this study, we employed a multi-tiered evaluation strategy that combines in silico modeling, in vitro assays, and curated mechanistic data within the OECD's Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) framework. Molecular docking using AutoDock Vina, CB-Dock2, and Endocrine Disruptome consistently revealed strong binding affinities of long-chain PFAS, particularly PFDA, PFOA, and 10:2 FTOH, to estrogen and androgen receptors. These predictions were corroborated by ER and AR transactivation assays (OECD TG 455/458), which demonstrated ER agonist and AR antagonist activity for the same compounds. In contrast, short-chain and sulfonated PFAS (PFHxA, PFBS, PFOS) exhibited limited to no activity across platforms. To enhance the biological relevance of the prioritization, we compiled supporting mechanistic evidence by applying the IATA framework to organize data along the adverse outcome pathway from molecular initiating events, through key events, to predicted adverse outcomes. Literature-reported alterations in steroidogenic enzymes and hormone levels were included to enrich mechanistic depth. All lines of evidences were systematically integrated into a weight-of-evidence matrix, enabling a transparent and biologically plausible ranking of PFAS based on receptor interaction, functional activity, and endocrine-disruptive potential. This combined approach identified PFDA and PFOA as high-priority endocrine disruptors and offers a scalable, non-in vivo strategy for the screening and risk-based prioritization of environmentally persistent chemicals.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology publishes original scientific research of relevance to animals or humans pertaining to the action of chemicals, drugs, or chemically-defined natural products.
Regular articles address mechanistic approaches to physiological, pharmacologic, biochemical, cellular, or molecular understanding of toxicologic/pathologic lesions and to methods used to describe these responses. Safety Science articles address outstanding state-of-the-art preclinical and human translational characterization of drug and chemical safety employing cutting-edge science. Highly significant Regulatory Safety Science articles will also be considered in this category. Papers concerned with alternatives to the use of experimental animals are encouraged.
Short articles report on high impact studies of broad interest to readers of TAAP that would benefit from rapid publication. These articles should contain no more than a combined total of four figures and tables. Authors should include in their cover letter the justification for consideration of their manuscript as a short article.