Completeness in Learning Resources: A Business Process Perspective

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Juárez-Hernández Julia Guadalupe;Fragoso-Díaz Olivia Graciela;Álvarez-Rodríguez Francisco Javier;Rojas-Pérez Juan Carlos
{"title":"Completeness in Learning Resources: A Business Process Perspective","authors":"Juárez-Hernández Julia Guadalupe;Fragoso-Díaz Olivia Graciela;Álvarez-Rodríguez Francisco Javier;Rojas-Pérez Juan Carlos","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2025.3627111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The advancement of information and communication technologies has facilitated access to learning resources, thereby transforming the manner in which knowledge is acquired both within the context of formal education and within the context of job training. However, one of the problems that accompanies the learning resources is the lack of methods to assess their quality so that users may select the best ones in order to achieve the learning objectives. One of the attributes that has been extensively mentioned in the literature as important to achieve learning objectives is completeness, which refers to how much information a resource must contain in order to support a learning objective. However, there are not recognized methods to measure completeness. This work objective is to develop a method and a system for evaluating completeness of learning resources employed in the context of workplace training. It is crucial to ensure the completeness of a resource in order to determine whether it contains the required information to achieve the learning objective for an organization. The method for completeness evaluation comprises the formal definition of a business process, the identification of its products, and a comparison of its products with the content of the learning resources, using natural language processing and six similarity measures. Forty learning resources were assessed for completeness; the results show that a considerable number of the evaluated learning resources exhibit significant deficiencies in terms of completeness. The method is a first approach to measure completeness from a business process, and some limitations were identified. It assumes equal importance among all content elements in a resource; it penalizes extensive resources such as books, and depends heavily on well-documented business processes. Furthermore, completeness should be considered alongside other quality attributes to ensure a more comprehensive evaluation of learning resources.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"20 ","pages":"347-357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11221987/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advancement of information and communication technologies has facilitated access to learning resources, thereby transforming the manner in which knowledge is acquired both within the context of formal education and within the context of job training. However, one of the problems that accompanies the learning resources is the lack of methods to assess their quality so that users may select the best ones in order to achieve the learning objectives. One of the attributes that has been extensively mentioned in the literature as important to achieve learning objectives is completeness, which refers to how much information a resource must contain in order to support a learning objective. However, there are not recognized methods to measure completeness. This work objective is to develop a method and a system for evaluating completeness of learning resources employed in the context of workplace training. It is crucial to ensure the completeness of a resource in order to determine whether it contains the required information to achieve the learning objective for an organization. The method for completeness evaluation comprises the formal definition of a business process, the identification of its products, and a comparison of its products with the content of the learning resources, using natural language processing and six similarity measures. Forty learning resources were assessed for completeness; the results show that a considerable number of the evaluated learning resources exhibit significant deficiencies in terms of completeness. The method is a first approach to measure completeness from a business process, and some limitations were identified. It assumes equal importance among all content elements in a resource; it penalizes extensive resources such as books, and depends heavily on well-documented business processes. Furthermore, completeness should be considered alongside other quality attributes to ensure a more comprehensive evaluation of learning resources.
学习资源的完整性:业务流程视角
信息和通信技术的进步促进了获得学习资源的机会,从而改变了在正规教育和职业培训范围内获得知识的方式。然而,伴随学习资源而来的问题之一是缺乏评估其质量的方法,使用户可以选择最好的资源来实现学习目标。在文献中被广泛提及的对实现学习目标很重要的属性之一是完整性,它指的是为了支持学习目标,资源必须包含多少信息。然而,没有公认的方法来衡量完整性。本工作目标是开发一种方法和系统来评估在工作场所培训中使用的学习资源的完整性。为了确定资源是否包含实现组织学习目标所需的信息,确保资源的完整性是至关重要的。完整性评估方法包括业务流程的正式定义、产品的识别以及产品与学习资源内容的比较,使用自然语言处理和六种相似性度量。评估了40个学习资源的完整性;结果表明,相当一部分被评估的学习资源在完整性方面存在显著不足。该方法是衡量业务流程完整性的第一种方法,并且确定了一些限制。它在资源中的所有内容元素中具有同等的重要性;它需要大量的资源,如书籍,并且严重依赖于文档良好的业务流程。此外,完整性应该与其他质量属性一起考虑,以确保对学习资源进行更全面的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书