Opposing interictal dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Progress in Neurobiology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-03 DOI:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102844
Christos Panagiotis Lisgaras , Helen E. Scharfman
{"title":"Opposing interictal dynamics in Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy","authors":"Christos Panagiotis Lisgaras ,&nbsp;Helen E. Scharfman","doi":"10.1016/j.pneurobio.2025.102844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advanced EEG technology has revealed that epileptiform activity occurs more frequently in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) than previously recognized, prompting debate over the utility of EEG in AD diagnostics. Yet, unlike epilepsy, epileptiform activity is not always observed in AD, leading to skepticism. Historically, this absence has been attributed to limited recording depth or insufficient recording duration. We tested an alternative hypothesis that certain types of epileptiform activity, specifically high frequency oscillations (HFOs, defined as 250–500 Hz fast ripples), inhibit interictal spikes (IIS), which are currently used to assess hyperexcitability clinically. We recorded wideband (0.1–500 Hz) hippocampal local field potentials in three AD (Tg2576, Presenilin 2<sup>-/-</sup>, Ts65Dn Down syndrome model) and two epilepsy (intrahippocampal kainic acid, pilocarpine) mouse models during wakefulness and sleep. In both AD and epilepsy, HFOs consistently outnumbered IIS across behavioral states, age and recording contact. However, IIS and HFOs showed divergent relationships: a negative correlation between their rates was observed only in AD, in contrast to a positive correlation in epilepsy. HFOs preceded IIS at much shorter intervals in epilepsy than in AD. Co-occurrence of IIS with ripples did not differ between AD and epilepsy. These findings reveal a novel dissociation between clinically-relevant EEG biomarkers in AD and epilepsy. In AD, HFOs may inhibit IIS, which could lead to underestimation of hyperexcitability and hinder patient stratification for anti-seizure therapies. While non-invasive HFO detection remains challenging, we stress the need for wideband EEG/MEG, particularly in AD, to assess the full extent of hyperexcitability and biomarker interactions that would otherwise remain undetected.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20851,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Neurobiology","volume":"256 ","pages":"Article 102844"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301008225001352","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced EEG technology has revealed that epileptiform activity occurs more frequently in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) than previously recognized, prompting debate over the utility of EEG in AD diagnostics. Yet, unlike epilepsy, epileptiform activity is not always observed in AD, leading to skepticism. Historically, this absence has been attributed to limited recording depth or insufficient recording duration. We tested an alternative hypothesis that certain types of epileptiform activity, specifically high frequency oscillations (HFOs, defined as 250–500 Hz fast ripples), inhibit interictal spikes (IIS), which are currently used to assess hyperexcitability clinically. We recorded wideband (0.1–500 Hz) hippocampal local field potentials in three AD (Tg2576, Presenilin 2-/-, Ts65Dn Down syndrome model) and two epilepsy (intrahippocampal kainic acid, pilocarpine) mouse models during wakefulness and sleep. In both AD and epilepsy, HFOs consistently outnumbered IIS across behavioral states, age and recording contact. However, IIS and HFOs showed divergent relationships: a negative correlation between their rates was observed only in AD, in contrast to a positive correlation in epilepsy. HFOs preceded IIS at much shorter intervals in epilepsy than in AD. Co-occurrence of IIS with ripples did not differ between AD and epilepsy. These findings reveal a novel dissociation between clinically-relevant EEG biomarkers in AD and epilepsy. In AD, HFOs may inhibit IIS, which could lead to underestimation of hyperexcitability and hinder patient stratification for anti-seizure therapies. While non-invasive HFO detection remains challenging, we stress the need for wideband EEG/MEG, particularly in AD, to assess the full extent of hyperexcitability and biomarker interactions that would otherwise remain undetected.
阿尔茨海默病和癫痫的对立间期动力学。
先进的脑电图技术显示,癫痫样活动在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中发生的频率比以前认识到的要高,这引发了对脑电图在AD诊断中的应用的争论。然而,与癫痫不同,阿尔茨海默氏症并不总是观察到癫痫样活动,导致怀疑。从历史上看,这种缺失归因于记录深度有限或记录时间不足。我们测试了另一种假设,即某些类型的癫痫样活动,特别是高频振荡(hfo,定义为250-500Hz的快速波纹),抑制间歇峰(IIS),这是目前临床上用于评估高兴奋性的方法。我们记录了三种AD (Tg2576,早老素2-/-,Ts65Dn唐氏综合征模型)和两种癫痫(海马内kainic酸,匹罗卡品)小鼠在清醒和睡眠时的宽带(0.1-500Hz)海马局部场电位。在阿尔茨海默病和癫痫中,在行为状态、年龄和记录接触中,hfo的数量始终超过IIS。然而,IIS和hfo表现出不同的关系:它们之间的负相关仅在AD中观察到,而在癫痫中则呈正相关。与AD相比,hfo在癫痫中发生IIS的时间间隔要短得多。IIS与纹波的共存在AD和癫痫之间没有差异。这些发现揭示了AD和癫痫临床相关脑电图生物标志物之间的新分离。在AD中,hfo可能抑制IIS,这可能导致对高兴奋性的低估,并阻碍患者分层抗癫痫治疗。虽然非侵入性HFO检测仍然具有挑战性,但我们强调需要宽带EEG/MEG,特别是在AD中,以评估高兴奋性和生物标志物相互作用的全面程度,否则将无法检测到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Progress in Neurobiology
Progress in Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
107
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Progress in Neurobiology is an international journal that publishes groundbreaking original research, comprehensive review articles and opinion pieces written by leading researchers. The journal welcomes contributions from the broad field of neuroscience that apply neurophysiological, biochemical, pharmacological, molecular biological, anatomical, computational and behavioral analyses to problems of molecular, cellular, developmental, systems, and clinical neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书