AI in Higher Education: Initial Teacher Training in the Critical and Didactic Use of Artificial Intelligence

IF 1 Q4 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Sebastián Martín-Gómez;Carlos J. González Ruiz
{"title":"AI in Higher Education: Initial Teacher Training in the Critical and Didactic Use of Artificial Intelligence","authors":"Sebastián Martín-Gómez;Carlos J. González Ruiz","doi":"10.1109/RITA.2025.3616509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was made possible by the University of La Laguna. The Educational Technology courses within the Bachelor’s degrees in Early Childhood Education and in Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (n = 103) were redesigned, integrating AI agents such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity into six phases for the critical use of these tools—questioning, comparison, critical dialogue, verification, re-elaboration and reflection—which guided students’ reflective interaction with AI. After the intervention, a mixed 23-item questionnaire was administered; descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of the “Evaluation and use of AI” dimension revealed that 88% of students believe AI should be didactically promoted in higher education and 42% identified ChatGPT as the agent providing the best answers. The most developed competencies were comparing outputs from different AI systems (66%), designing effective prompts (63%) and critically analysing responses (52%). The main potentialities highlighted were rapid access to information and time saving, while perceived risks centred on plagiarism and cognitive dependence. The findings corroborate the pedagogical validity of the model for strengthening prompt-engineering skills and critical thinking, yet underscore the need to deepen ethical training and rigorous verification frameworks to address concerns about academic integrity and AI reliability. It is concluded that a reflective and regulated integration of these technologies can significantly enhance teacher education in higher education.","PeriodicalId":38963,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","volume":"20 ","pages":"302-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11186800","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11186800/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was made possible by the University of La Laguna. The Educational Technology courses within the Bachelor’s degrees in Early Childhood Education and in Physical Activity and Sports Sciences (n = 103) were redesigned, integrating AI agents such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Perplexity into six phases for the critical use of these tools—questioning, comparison, critical dialogue, verification, re-elaboration and reflection—which guided students’ reflective interaction with AI. After the intervention, a mixed 23-item questionnaire was administered; descriptive statistics and thematic analysis of the “Evaluation and use of AI” dimension revealed that 88% of students believe AI should be didactically promoted in higher education and 42% identified ChatGPT as the agent providing the best answers. The most developed competencies were comparing outputs from different AI systems (66%), designing effective prompts (63%) and critically analysing responses (52%). The main potentialities highlighted were rapid access to information and time saving, while perceived risks centred on plagiarism and cognitive dependence. The findings corroborate the pedagogical validity of the model for strengthening prompt-engineering skills and critical thinking, yet underscore the need to deepen ethical training and rigorous verification frameworks to address concerns about academic integrity and AI reliability. It is concluded that a reflective and regulated integration of these technologies can significantly enhance teacher education in higher education.
高等教育中的人工智能:人工智能批判性和教学应用的初步教师培训
这项研究是由拉古纳大学促成的。重新设计了幼儿教育和体育活动与运动科学学士学位课程中的教育技术课程(n = 103),将ChatGPT、Gemini和Perplexity等人工智能代理整合为六个阶段,用于批判性地使用这些工具——质疑、比较、批判性对话、验证、重新阐述和反思——指导学生与人工智能进行反思性互动。干预后,采用23项混合问卷;对“人工智能的评估和使用”维度的描述性统计和专题分析显示,88%的学生认为人工智能应该在高等教育中得到教学推广,42%的学生认为ChatGPT是提供最佳答案的代理。最发达的能力是比较不同人工智能系统的输出(66%),设计有效的提示(63%)和批判性地分析回应(52%)。强调的主要潜力是快速获取信息和节省时间,而感知到的风险集中在抄袭和认知依赖上。研究结果证实了该模型在加强快速工程技能和批判性思维方面的教学有效性,但也强调了深化道德培训和严格验证框架的必要性,以解决对学术诚信和人工智能可靠性的担忧。结论是,反思和规范地整合这些技术可以显著提高高等教育的教师教育水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书