Less distracted, more restrained: Attentional differences on the rapid serial visual presentation task in restrained eaters to food words and pictures

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Appetite Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2025.108356
Mechteld M. van den Hoek Ostende , Caterina Gawrilow , Barbara Kaup , Jennifer Svaldi
{"title":"Less distracted, more restrained: Attentional differences on the rapid serial visual presentation task in restrained eaters to food words and pictures","authors":"Mechteld M. van den Hoek Ostende ,&nbsp;Caterina Gawrilow ,&nbsp;Barbara Kaup ,&nbsp;Jennifer Svaldi","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Restrained eaters (RE) are individuals that regularly show disinhibited food intake despite attempts of cognitive dietary restraint. This disinhibition is often attributed to an abundance of food cues in the environment that repeatedly draw attention, although the literature remains ambiguous. One source of ambiguity is the influence of different food cue modalities (pictures, words) on attentional processes. The current study therefore investigates the effect different modalities have on attentional bias to food cues in RE (<em>n</em> = 70) compared to unrestrained eaters (URE; <em>n</em> = 74). After a standardized lunch, participants completed a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation task with concurrent electroencephalography. Trials consisted of streams of pictures or words, with task-irrelevant food and animal distractors at lag 2 before an animal target appeared. Model comparisons indicated a significant Group × Distractor Type interaction. Specifically, RE were more accurate at identifying targets that were preceded by food compared to animal stimuli than URE. Exploratory analyses indicated that this was especially due to food pictures. This finding was not accompanied by changes in event related potentials. Furthermore, we found a significant Modality × Distractor Type interaction. In the picture, but not in the word condition, participants correctly identified targets preceded by a food distractor more often than when preceded by an animal distractor. This finding was accompanied by an increased P300 after food cues. In all, we showed that RE more effectively ignore food cues, especially in the image condition. This contributes to a body of research that demonstrates increased inhibitory control over food cues in RE. Future studies have to determine under which conditions inhibition of food cues is successful in RE.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":"217 ","pages":"Article 108356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195666325005094","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restrained eaters (RE) are individuals that regularly show disinhibited food intake despite attempts of cognitive dietary restraint. This disinhibition is often attributed to an abundance of food cues in the environment that repeatedly draw attention, although the literature remains ambiguous. One source of ambiguity is the influence of different food cue modalities (pictures, words) on attentional processes. The current study therefore investigates the effect different modalities have on attentional bias to food cues in RE (n = 70) compared to unrestrained eaters (URE; n = 74). After a standardized lunch, participants completed a Rapid Serial Visual Presentation task with concurrent electroencephalography. Trials consisted of streams of pictures or words, with task-irrelevant food and animal distractors at lag 2 before an animal target appeared. Model comparisons indicated a significant Group × Distractor Type interaction. Specifically, RE were more accurate at identifying targets that were preceded by food compared to animal stimuli than URE. Exploratory analyses indicated that this was especially due to food pictures. This finding was not accompanied by changes in event related potentials. Furthermore, we found a significant Modality × Distractor Type interaction. In the picture, but not in the word condition, participants correctly identified targets preceded by a food distractor more often than when preceded by an animal distractor. This finding was accompanied by an increased P300 after food cues. In all, we showed that RE more effectively ignore food cues, especially in the image condition. This contributes to a body of research that demonstrates increased inhibitory control over food cues in RE. Future studies have to determine under which conditions inhibition of food cues is successful in RE.
少分心,多克制:克制进食者对食物文字和图片的快速连续视觉呈现任务的注意差异。
克制饮食者(RE)是指尽管尝试了认知性饮食限制,但仍经常表现出不受抑制的食物摄入的个体。这种去抑制通常归因于环境中丰富的食物线索,这些食物线索反复引起人们的注意,尽管文献仍然模棱两可。歧义的一个来源是不同的食物线索模式(图片,文字)对注意力过程的影响。因此,本研究调查了不同进食方式对进食者(n = 70)和不受限制进食者(n = 74)对食物线索注意偏差的影响。在标准化的午餐后,参与者完成了快速连续视觉呈现任务,并发脑电图。实验包括一连串的图片或文字,与任务无关的食物和动物干扰物在动物目标出现之前的滞后2秒。模型比较表明组×干扰物型相互作用显著。具体来说,与动物刺激相比,RE在识别食物之前的目标方面比URE更准确。探索性分析表明,这主要是由于食物图片。这一发现并没有伴随着事件相关电位的变化。此外,我们发现了显著的模态与干扰物类型的相互作用。在图片测试中,而不是在单词测试中,参与者在食物干扰前正确识别目标的次数比在动物干扰前更多。这一发现伴随着食物提示后P300的增加。总之,我们发现RE更有效地忽略了食物线索,尤其是在图像条件下。这有助于一系列研究表明,在RE中对食物线索的抑制控制增加。未来的研究必须确定在何种条件下食物线索的抑制在RE中是成功的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书