A Benchmark of Cryo-CMOS Dynamic Comparators in a 40 nm Bulk CMOS Technology

IF 2 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Bram Veraverbeke;Filip Tavernier
{"title":"A Benchmark of Cryo-CMOS Dynamic Comparators in a 40 nm Bulk CMOS Technology","authors":"Bram Veraverbeke;Filip Tavernier","doi":"10.1109/LSSC.2025.3618161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All cryo-CMOS quantum-classical control interfaces require an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) bridging the analog qubits and the digital control logic. Dynamic comparators play a crucial role in the precision, speed, and power consumption of these ADCs. Yet, their performance is severely impacted by the cryogenic environment. Therefore, this letter benchmarks, for the first time in the literature, four comparator topologies at room temperature (RT) and 6K. Their noise, delay, and energy consumption are characterized, allowing the identification of the best topology for a given application. This analysis shows that the strongARM (SA) comparator is the most energy efficient, closely followed by the double tail comparator. However, the reduced voltage headroom at 6K almost doubles the SA’s delay compared to RT and leaves it susceptible to common-mode and supply voltage variations. In contrast, the recently proposed triple tail comparator with capacitive over-neutralization limits the delay increase to only 13ps by separating the preamplifier and the latch. Furthermore, its boosted preamplification gain makes it notably more resilient to voltage variations, ensuring a highly robust cryogenic operation favorable for scaled technologies.","PeriodicalId":13032,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters","volume":"8 ","pages":"317-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11193681/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All cryo-CMOS quantum-classical control interfaces require an analog-to-digital converter (ADC) bridging the analog qubits and the digital control logic. Dynamic comparators play a crucial role in the precision, speed, and power consumption of these ADCs. Yet, their performance is severely impacted by the cryogenic environment. Therefore, this letter benchmarks, for the first time in the literature, four comparator topologies at room temperature (RT) and 6K. Their noise, delay, and energy consumption are characterized, allowing the identification of the best topology for a given application. This analysis shows that the strongARM (SA) comparator is the most energy efficient, closely followed by the double tail comparator. However, the reduced voltage headroom at 6K almost doubles the SA’s delay compared to RT and leaves it susceptible to common-mode and supply voltage variations. In contrast, the recently proposed triple tail comparator with capacitive over-neutralization limits the delay increase to only 13ps by separating the preamplifier and the latch. Furthermore, its boosted preamplification gain makes it notably more resilient to voltage variations, ensuring a highly robust cryogenic operation favorable for scaled technologies.
Cryo-CMOS动态比较器在40纳米体CMOS技术中的基准测试
所有cryo-CMOS量子经典控制接口都需要模数转换器(ADC)桥接模拟量子位和数字控制逻辑。动态比较器在这些adc的精度、速度和功耗方面起着至关重要的作用。然而,低温环境严重影响了它们的性能。因此,本文在文献中首次对室温(RT)和6K下的四种比较器拓扑进行了基准测试。对它们的噪声、延迟和能耗进行了表征,从而可以确定给定应用程序的最佳拓扑。分析表明,强arm (SA)比较器是最节能的,其次是双尾比较器。然而,与RT相比,6K时降低的电压净空几乎使SA的延迟增加了一倍,并且使其容易受到共模和电源电压变化的影响。相比之下,最近提出的带有电容过中和的三尾比较器通过分离前置放大器和锁存器,将延迟增加限制在仅13ps。此外,其增强的预放大增益使其对电压变化的适应能力更强,确保了高度稳健的低温操作,有利于规模化技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters
IEEE Solid-State Circuits Letters Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
52
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书