Dead Body or Yummy Bacon? Gender and Perceived Intensity Outweigh Odor Label in Eliciting Disgust.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Lenka Martinec Nováková, Dagmar Schwambergová, Iveta Hocko Fajnerová, Petra Mžourková, Michaela Slavíková, Jan Havlíček
{"title":"Dead Body or Yummy Bacon? Gender and Perceived Intensity Outweigh Odor Label in Eliciting Disgust.","authors":"Lenka Martinec Nováková, Dagmar Schwambergová, Iveta Hocko Fajnerová, Petra Mžourková, Michaela Slavíková, Jan Havlíček","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disgustingness is an under-researched odor property distinct from unpleasantness, but like hedonic valence, it is likely susceptible to cognitive modulation. Beliefs about odor identity related to potential pathogenic risk can lead to markedly contrasting odor perception, including perceived disgustingness, compared to when the odor is not regarded as suggestive of pathogenicity. We hypothesized that applying a pathogenic label would significantly increase disgust, especially for intense odors. We presented 90 healthy Czech young adults with four unpleasant, realistic smells reminiscent of decomposing flesh and used as fish attractors. The participants rated the odors for perceived disgustingness, pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity, and performed an odor naming task. The results revealed that applying a pathogenic label significantly increased disgust ratings (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.03) but that gender (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10) and perceived odor intensity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.09) were more influential predictors of disgustingness. These findings suggest that for aversive but ambiguous odors, the influence of bottom-up sensory processing and raters' individual characteristics may outweigh top-down cognitive labeling in driving the disgust response.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disgustingness is an under-researched odor property distinct from unpleasantness, but like hedonic valence, it is likely susceptible to cognitive modulation. Beliefs about odor identity related to potential pathogenic risk can lead to markedly contrasting odor perception, including perceived disgustingness, compared to when the odor is not regarded as suggestive of pathogenicity. We hypothesized that applying a pathogenic label would significantly increase disgust, especially for intense odors. We presented 90 healthy Czech young adults with four unpleasant, realistic smells reminiscent of decomposing flesh and used as fish attractors. The participants rated the odors for perceived disgustingness, pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity, and performed an odor naming task. The results revealed that applying a pathogenic label significantly increased disgust ratings (R2 = 0.03) but that gender (R2 = 0.10) and perceived odor intensity (R2 = 0.09) were more influential predictors of disgustingness. These findings suggest that for aversive but ambiguous odors, the influence of bottom-up sensory processing and raters' individual characteristics may outweigh top-down cognitive labeling in driving the disgust response.

死尸还是美味的培根?性别和感知强度比气味标签更能引起厌恶。
恶心是一种有待研究的气味特性,不同于不愉快,但就像享乐价一样,它很可能受到认知调节的影响。与不被认为具有致病性的气味相比,与潜在致病风险相关的气味识别信念可导致明显不同的气味感知,包括感知到的厌恶感。我们假设使用致病标签会显著增加厌恶感,特别是对强烈的气味。我们向90名健康的捷克年轻人展示了四种令人不快的、真实的气味,让人联想到腐烂的肉,并用作鱼的吸引剂。参与者对气味的厌恶程度、愉悦程度、强度和熟悉程度进行评分,并执行气味命名任务。结果显示,使用致病标签显著增加厌恶评分(R2 = 0.03),但性别(R2 = 0.10)和感知气味强度(R2 = 0.09)是更有影响的厌恶预测因素。这些发现表明,对于令人厌恶但模棱两可的气味,自下而上的感觉加工和评分者的个人特征在驱动厌恶反应方面的影响可能大于自上而下的认知标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信