Lenka Martinec Nováková, Dagmar Schwambergová, Iveta Hocko Fajnerová, Petra Mžourková, Michaela Slavíková, Jan Havlíček
{"title":"Dead Body or Yummy Bacon? Gender and Perceived Intensity Outweigh Odor Label in Eliciting Disgust.","authors":"Lenka Martinec Nováková, Dagmar Schwambergová, Iveta Hocko Fajnerová, Petra Mžourková, Michaela Slavíková, Jan Havlíček","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disgustingness is an under-researched odor property distinct from unpleasantness, but like hedonic valence, it is likely susceptible to cognitive modulation. Beliefs about odor identity related to potential pathogenic risk can lead to markedly contrasting odor perception, including perceived disgustingness, compared to when the odor is not regarded as suggestive of pathogenicity. We hypothesized that applying a pathogenic label would significantly increase disgust, especially for intense odors. We presented 90 healthy Czech young adults with four unpleasant, realistic smells reminiscent of decomposing flesh and used as fish attractors. The participants rated the odors for perceived disgustingness, pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity, and performed an odor naming task. The results revealed that applying a pathogenic label significantly increased disgust ratings (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.03) but that gender (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.10) and perceived odor intensity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.09) were more influential predictors of disgustingness. These findings suggest that for aversive but ambiguous odors, the influence of bottom-up sensory processing and raters' individual characteristics may outweigh top-down cognitive labeling in driving the disgust response.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108353"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108353","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Disgustingness is an under-researched odor property distinct from unpleasantness, but like hedonic valence, it is likely susceptible to cognitive modulation. Beliefs about odor identity related to potential pathogenic risk can lead to markedly contrasting odor perception, including perceived disgustingness, compared to when the odor is not regarded as suggestive of pathogenicity. We hypothesized that applying a pathogenic label would significantly increase disgust, especially for intense odors. We presented 90 healthy Czech young adults with four unpleasant, realistic smells reminiscent of decomposing flesh and used as fish attractors. The participants rated the odors for perceived disgustingness, pleasantness, intensity, and familiarity, and performed an odor naming task. The results revealed that applying a pathogenic label significantly increased disgust ratings (R2 = 0.03) but that gender (R2 = 0.10) and perceived odor intensity (R2 = 0.09) were more influential predictors of disgustingness. These findings suggest that for aversive but ambiguous odors, the influence of bottom-up sensory processing and raters' individual characteristics may outweigh top-down cognitive labeling in driving the disgust response.
期刊介绍:
Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.