Task repetition and L2 written performance: A meta-analysis

IF 7.7 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101255
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari , Jingyuan Zhuang , Mahsa Farahanynia
{"title":"Task repetition and L2 written performance: A meta-analysis","authors":"Mahmoud Abdi Tabari ,&nbsp;Jingyuan Zhuang ,&nbsp;Mahsa Farahanynia","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This meta-analysis investigates the effects of task repetition (TR) on the syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF) of second language (L2) written production. The study included 31 studies, with 65 unique samples. Results from three-level meta-analytic models revealed that task repetition had a positive effect on all CALF constructs, with significant effect sizes for accuracy (<em>d</em> = 1.19), lexical complexity (<em>d</em> = 0.75), fluency (<em>d</em> = 0.50), and syntactic complexity (<em>d</em> = 0.37). These findings suggest that TR is particularly beneficial for accuracy and lexical complexity but less effective for fluency and syntactic complexity. Variance analysis indicated that differences between primary samples accounted for the largest portion of total variance in all CALF constructs. Further moderator analyses revealed that factors such as spacing interval, number of repetitions, and feedback moderated the effects: Longer spacing intervals were associated with smaller effects, while more repetitions generally resulted in larger effects. Compared to TR without feedback, TR with feedback showed a statistically significant advantage for accuracy, a non-significant advantage for syntactic complexity and fluency, and a disadvantage for lexical complexity. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing TR within task-based language teaching (TBLT) to enhance L2 written production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101255"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This meta-analysis investigates the effects of task repetition (TR) on the syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF) of second language (L2) written production. The study included 31 studies, with 65 unique samples. Results from three-level meta-analytic models revealed that task repetition had a positive effect on all CALF constructs, with significant effect sizes for accuracy (d = 1.19), lexical complexity (d = 0.75), fluency (d = 0.50), and syntactic complexity (d = 0.37). These findings suggest that TR is particularly beneficial for accuracy and lexical complexity but less effective for fluency and syntactic complexity. Variance analysis indicated that differences between primary samples accounted for the largest portion of total variance in all CALF constructs. Further moderator analyses revealed that factors such as spacing interval, number of repetitions, and feedback moderated the effects: Longer spacing intervals were associated with smaller effects, while more repetitions generally resulted in larger effects. Compared to TR without feedback, TR with feedback showed a statistically significant advantage for accuracy, a non-significant advantage for syntactic complexity and fluency, and a disadvantage for lexical complexity. This study provides valuable insights into optimizing TR within task-based language teaching (TBLT) to enhance L2 written production.
任务重复与第二语言写作表现:一项元分析
本荟萃分析探讨了任务重复(TR)对第二语言书面写作的句法复杂性、准确性、词汇复杂性和流畅性(CALF)的影响。这项研究包括31项研究,有65个独特的样本。三水平元分析模型的结果显示,任务重复对所有CALF构念都有积极影响,其中准确性(d = 1.19)、词汇复杂性(d = 0.75)、流畅性(d = 0.50)和句法复杂性(d = 0.37)的影响显著。这些发现表明,TR对准确性和词汇复杂性特别有益,但对流利性和句法复杂性的效果较差。方差分析表明,在所有CALF结构中,主要样本之间的差异占总方差的最大部分。进一步的调节分析表明,间隔时间、重复次数和反馈等因素会调节这种影响:间隔时间越长,影响越小,而重复次数越多,影响越大。与没有反馈的翻译相比,有反馈的翻译在准确性上有统计学上显著的优势,在句法复杂性和流畅性上有不显著的优势,在词汇复杂性上有劣势。本研究为优化任务型语言教学(TBLT)中的TR以提高二语书面产出提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书