Implementation of Online Mindfulness With Peer Mentoring for Parent and Sibling Carers of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Caitlin A Murray, Nikita K Hayden, Alex Gordon-Brown, Samantha Flynn, Clare Bonetree, Andrew Harper, Clare Kassa, David Mahon, Catherine McGee, Richard P Hastings
{"title":"Implementation of Online Mindfulness With Peer Mentoring for Parent and Sibling Carers of People With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.","authors":"Caitlin A Murray, Nikita K Hayden, Alex Gordon-Brown, Samantha Flynn, Clare Bonetree, Andrew Harper, Clare Kassa, David Mahon, Catherine McGee, Richard P Hastings","doi":"10.1111/jir.70057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is promising evidence for the adaptation of online mindfulness interventions for parent carers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities by including supplementary peer support sessions. However, there remain questions about wider implementation beyond the research setting and the inclusion of more diverse populations of family caregivers, including adult siblings and family carers who less typically receive support and are often under-represented in research.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>One hundred and one family carers (n = 58 parents, n = 43 adult siblings) were provided with access to Be Mindful (an online mindfulness intervention) with additional telephone peer mentor support. Participants were asked to complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires before and after the intervention in a pre-post pre-experimental design, and engagement with the intervention and peer support was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment was successful in targeting more diverse groups, including adult siblings. Intervention completion was low overall (n = 37). Parent and sibling carers made differing levels of progress with the intervention and peer support calls, although 81.8% of those who completed the intervention before the end of the project had also received all three support calls. Preliminary follow-up data, though with low retention, indicated improvements in psychological wellbeing for family carers over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention and additional telephone-guided support were received well by family carers of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, although further work is needed to determine the feasibility of future implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70057","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is promising evidence for the adaptation of online mindfulness interventions for parent carers of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities by including supplementary peer support sessions. However, there remain questions about wider implementation beyond the research setting and the inclusion of more diverse populations of family caregivers, including adult siblings and family carers who less typically receive support and are often under-represented in research.

Method: One hundred and one family carers (n = 58 parents, n = 43 adult siblings) were provided with access to Be Mindful (an online mindfulness intervention) with additional telephone peer mentor support. Participants were asked to complete baseline and follow-up questionnaires before and after the intervention in a pre-post pre-experimental design, and engagement with the intervention and peer support was examined.

Results: Recruitment was successful in targeting more diverse groups, including adult siblings. Intervention completion was low overall (n = 37). Parent and sibling carers made differing levels of progress with the intervention and peer support calls, although 81.8% of those who completed the intervention before the end of the project had also received all three support calls. Preliminary follow-up data, though with low retention, indicated improvements in psychological wellbeing for family carers over time.

Conclusions: The intervention and additional telephone-guided support were received well by family carers of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, although further work is needed to determine the feasibility of future implementation.

对智力和发育障碍者的父母和兄弟姐妹照顾者实施在线正念与同伴辅导。
背景:有很好的证据表明,通过包括补充同伴支持会议,在线正念干预适用于智力和发育障碍个体的父母照顾者。然而,在研究范围之外的更广泛的实施以及包括更多样化的家庭照顾者人群,包括成年兄弟姐妹和家庭照顾者,这些人通常得不到支持,而且在研究中往往代表性不足,仍然存在问题。方法:为101名家庭照顾者(n = 58名父母,n = 43名成年兄弟姐妹)提供“正念”(一种在线正念干预)和额外的电话同伴导师支持。参与者被要求在干预前后完成基线和随访问卷,并对干预和同伴支持的参与情况进行了检查。结果:招募是成功的针对更多样化的群体,包括成年兄弟姐妹。干预完成率总体较低(n = 37)。父母和兄弟姐妹的照顾者在干预和同伴支持电话方面取得了不同程度的进展,尽管在项目结束前完成干预的人中有81.8%也收到了所有三个支持电话。初步的随访数据显示,尽管保留率较低,但随着时间的推移,家庭照顾者的心理健康状况有所改善。结论:干预和额外的电话指导支持得到了智力和发育障碍者家庭照顾者的良好接受,尽管需要进一步的工作来确定未来实施的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信