Optimization of road route alignment: a systematic literature review with meta analysis

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Shitij Agrawal, Sanskar Jamadar, Suraj Sawant, Ranjeet Vasant Bidwe, Amit Joshi
{"title":"Optimization of road route alignment: a systematic literature review with meta analysis","authors":"Shitij Agrawal,&nbsp;Sanskar Jamadar,&nbsp;Suraj Sawant,&nbsp;Ranjeet Vasant Bidwe,&nbsp;Amit Joshi","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11396-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This systematic literature review (SLR) integrates Geographic Information Systems (GIS), deep learning, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to enhance road route optimization, crucial for global infrastructure development. This SLR aims to identify existing research trends, methodologies, research gaps and propose a generalized framework for streamlining the road route optimization process. The review addresses three key research questions: RQ-1. The application of deep learning for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classification, RQ-2. The use of MCDM techniques in road route alignment and RQ-3. Techniques for optimizing road route alignment. Utilizing PRISMA, we assessed 370 papers, selected 132 through full-text evaluation, and added 25 via. snowball sampling, totalling 157 records for analysis. The results reveal trends in current research, geographical distribution and the evolution of methodologies. It is found that Deep learning techniques significantly improve LULC classification accuracy, while MCDM techniques enable a holistic approach to road route alignment by incorporating diverse factors. The proposed generalized framework outlines a systematic approach encompassing problem definition, criteria selection, data preparation, deep learning-based LULC classification, MCDM and Least Cost Path analysis for road route alignment. This work uniquely identifies research trends, methodologies, and gaps in road route optimization, addressing three specific research questions (RQ-1 to RQ-3) on deep learning (LULC classification), MCDM techniques, and route alignment optimization. This work also highlights the scope for integrating emerging technologies, enhancing MCDM approaches, promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration, addressing data availability and quality, conducting case studies, emphasizing sustainability, resilience and focusing on global and regional contexts. This SLR will surely contribute to the development of efficient, sustainable and equitable road route optimization strategies for better infrastructure planning and worldwide development.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11396-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11396-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This systematic literature review (SLR) integrates Geographic Information Systems (GIS), deep learning, and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) to enhance road route optimization, crucial for global infrastructure development. This SLR aims to identify existing research trends, methodologies, research gaps and propose a generalized framework for streamlining the road route optimization process. The review addresses three key research questions: RQ-1. The application of deep learning for Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) classification, RQ-2. The use of MCDM techniques in road route alignment and RQ-3. Techniques for optimizing road route alignment. Utilizing PRISMA, we assessed 370 papers, selected 132 through full-text evaluation, and added 25 via. snowball sampling, totalling 157 records for analysis. The results reveal trends in current research, geographical distribution and the evolution of methodologies. It is found that Deep learning techniques significantly improve LULC classification accuracy, while MCDM techniques enable a holistic approach to road route alignment by incorporating diverse factors. The proposed generalized framework outlines a systematic approach encompassing problem definition, criteria selection, data preparation, deep learning-based LULC classification, MCDM and Least Cost Path analysis for road route alignment. This work uniquely identifies research trends, methodologies, and gaps in road route optimization, addressing three specific research questions (RQ-1 to RQ-3) on deep learning (LULC classification), MCDM techniques, and route alignment optimization. This work also highlights the scope for integrating emerging technologies, enhancing MCDM approaches, promoting cross-disciplinary collaboration, addressing data availability and quality, conducting case studies, emphasizing sustainability, resilience and focusing on global and regional contexts. This SLR will surely contribute to the development of efficient, sustainable and equitable road route optimization strategies for better infrastructure planning and worldwide development.

道路路线优化:系统文献综述与meta分析
本系统文献综述(SLR)整合了地理信息系统(GIS)、深度学习和多标准决策(MCDM),以增强对全球基础设施发展至关重要的道路路线优化。该SLR旨在确定现有的研究趋势、方法、研究差距,并提出一个简化道路路线优化过程的通用框架。这篇综述讨论了三个关键的研究问题:RQ-1。深度学习在土地利用和土地覆盖分类中的应用,RQ-2。MCDM技术在道路路线对齐和RQ-3中的应用。道路路线优化技术。我们利用PRISMA对370篇论文进行了评估,其中通过全文评审选出132篇,通过评议增加25篇。滚雪球抽样,共157条记录供分析。结果揭示了当前研究的趋势、地理分布和方法的演变。研究发现,深度学习技术显著提高了LULC分类的准确性,而MCDM技术通过整合多种因素,实现了道路路线对齐的整体方法。提出的广义框架概述了一个系统的方法,包括问题定义、标准选择、数据准备、基于深度学习的LULC分类、MCDM和道路路线对准的最小成本路径分析。这项工作独特地确定了道路路线优化的研究趋势、方法和差距,解决了关于深度学习(LULC分类)、MCDM技术和路线优化的三个具体研究问题(RQ-1到RQ-3)。这项工作还强调了整合新兴技术、加强MCDM方法、促进跨学科合作、解决数据可用性和质量问题、开展案例研究、强调可持续性、复原力以及关注全球和区域背景的范围。该SLR必将有助于制定高效、可持续和公平的道路路线优化战略,以更好地规划基础设施和促进全球发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信