Leak during term neonatal CPAP stabilisation: does resuscitation device design affect delivered PEEP - a bench study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Viktoria Gruber, Stephanie Morakeas, Murray Hinder, Thomas Drevhammar, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Mark Brian Tracy
{"title":"Leak during term neonatal CPAP stabilisation: does resuscitation device design affect delivered PEEP - a bench study.","authors":"Viktoria Gruber, Stephanie Morakeas, Murray Hinder, Thomas Drevhammar, Mithilesh Dronavalli, Mark Brian Tracy","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH<sub>2</sub>O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH<sub>2</sub>O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12530372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003679","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mask leak is common during newborn resuscitation, impacting delivered ventilation. Less is known about the effect of leak during assisted spontaneous breathing with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Aim: Compare CPAP performance in the presence of leak of two T-piece resuscitation devices, with differing design-imposed resistances: high resistance Neopuff and low resistance rPAP.

Methods: Devices were tested on a term dynamic lung model (compliance 1.0 mL/cmH2O, tidal volume (VT) 23 mL) at three incremental leak levels and set positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) 5 cmH2O, 7 cmH2O and 9 cmH2O. Continuous leaks were generated by differing-length tubes open to atmosphere. Measured parameters were mean pressure, fluctuations around set pressure (∆P), VT and leak flow.

Results: 2437 breaths were analysed (1216 rPAP, 1221 Neopuff). Leak reduced PEEP, with the largest reduction at the highest leak and 9 cmH2O set PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH2O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH2O). Higher delivered PEEP was associated with higher leak flows (Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH2O set PEEP). VT reduced with Neopuff compared with rPAP (Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL, no leak, 9 cmH2O set PEEP) and was affected by delivered PEEP.

Conclusion: The delivered support differed between devices in the presence of leaks. rPAP maintained pressures closer to the set PEEP value at all leak levels, and higher leak flows were seen with the maintained distending pressure. Neopuff's higher resistance led to reductions in VT that were more pronounced at low leak levels.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

足月新生儿CPAP稳定期间的泄漏:复苏装置设计是否影响输送的PEEP -一项实验研究。
背景:新生儿复苏过程中口罩泄漏是常见的,影响新生儿通气。在持续气道正压通气(CPAP)辅助自主呼吸过程中,漏气的影响尚不清楚。目的:比较两种具有不同设计阻力的t片式复苏装置在存在泄漏时的CPAP性能:高阻力Neopuff和低阻力rPAP。方法:在三种增量泄漏水平下,设置呼气末正压(PEEP) 5 cmH2O、7 cmH2O和9 cmH2O,在长期动态肺模型(顺应性1.0 mL/cmH2O,潮气量(VT) 23 mL)上对装置进行测试。不同长度的管道向大气开放,产生连续泄漏。测量参数为平均压力、设定压力周围波动(∆P)、VT和泄漏流量。结果:共分析2437次呼吸(rPAP 1216次,Neopuff 1221次)。泄漏降低了PEEP,最大泄漏降低最大,9 cmH2O设置PEEP (Neopuff 2.6 cmH2O vs rPAP 7.0 cmH2O)。较高的PEEP与较高的泄漏流量相关(Neopuff 4.4 L/min vs rPAP 8.2 L/min, 9 cmH2O设定PEEP)。与rPAP相比,Neopuff组VT降低(Neopuff 18 mL vs rPAP 23.2 mL,无泄漏,9 cmH2O设定PEEP),并受输送PEEP的影响。结论:在存在泄漏的情况下,不同设备提供的支持不同。在所有泄漏水平下,rPAP保持压力更接近设定的PEEP值,并且在保持膨胀压力的情况下,可以看到更高的泄漏流量。Neopuff的高阻力导致VT的降低,在低泄漏水平下更为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信