Chromatic pupil campimetry as objective diagnostic tool for progressive optic neuropathies.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Márton Viktor Edelmayer, Torsten Strasser, Ronja Jung, Anton Sonntag, Ricarda Jendritza, Felix Tonagel, Tobias Peters, Helmut Wilhelm, Barbara Wilhelm, Carina Kelbsch
{"title":"Chromatic pupil campimetry as objective diagnostic tool for progressive optic neuropathies.","authors":"Márton Viktor Edelmayer, Torsten Strasser, Ronja Jung, Anton Sonntag, Ricarda Jendritza, Felix Tonagel, Tobias Peters, Helmut Wilhelm, Barbara Wilhelm, Carina Kelbsch","doi":"10.1007/s10633-025-10054-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study assessed the diagnostic potential of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA), pupillary light response (PLR) latency, and pupillary escape to differentiate optic neuropathies (ON) from healthy individuals and identify specific ON subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CPC testing used red and blue stimuli at central (0°) and peripheral (20°) locations to measure relMCA, latency, and pupillary escape. Patients with various ON etiologies, including glaucoma (n = 20), optic nerve compression by meningioma (n = 18), chiasm compression (n = 4), Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON; n = 4), and autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA; n = 3), were tested. Linear mixed-effects models and post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze differences across subgroups of ON etiologies and a healthy control group (n = 40), regarding signal eccentricities and locations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pupillary escape was significantly higher in ON patients during central red stimulation (p = 0.0007). Glaucoma and meningioma groups showed reduced relMCA and prolonged latency for both stimuli compared to controls (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0058). RelMCA during blue stimulation was lower in glaucoma patients than in ADOA (p = 0.0183). LHON patients exhibited significantly prolonged PLR latency during blue stimulation compared to healthy (p = 0.0284).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CPC effectively distinguished glaucoma and meningioma from healthy controls but was less reliable for differentiating ON subtypes. Our results indicate, that central pupillary escape is associated with inner retinal dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11207,"journal":{"name":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Documenta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-025-10054-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study assessed the diagnostic potential of chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC) using relative maximal constriction amplitude (relMCA), pupillary light response (PLR) latency, and pupillary escape to differentiate optic neuropathies (ON) from healthy individuals and identify specific ON subtypes.

Methods: CPC testing used red and blue stimuli at central (0°) and peripheral (20°) locations to measure relMCA, latency, and pupillary escape. Patients with various ON etiologies, including glaucoma (n = 20), optic nerve compression by meningioma (n = 18), chiasm compression (n = 4), Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON; n = 4), and autosomal dominant optic atrophy (ADOA; n = 3), were tested. Linear mixed-effects models and post hoc Tukey tests were used to analyze differences across subgroups of ON etiologies and a healthy control group (n = 40), regarding signal eccentricities and locations.

Results: Pupillary escape was significantly higher in ON patients during central red stimulation (p = 0.0007). Glaucoma and meningioma groups showed reduced relMCA and prolonged latency for both stimuli compared to controls (p < 0.0001 to p = 0.0058). RelMCA during blue stimulation was lower in glaucoma patients than in ADOA (p = 0.0183). LHON patients exhibited significantly prolonged PLR latency during blue stimulation compared to healthy (p = 0.0284).

Conclusion: CPC effectively distinguished glaucoma and meningioma from healthy controls but was less reliable for differentiating ON subtypes. Our results indicate, that central pupillary escape is associated with inner retinal dysfunction.

彩色瞳孔测量作为进行性视神经病变的客观诊断工具。
目的:本研究通过相对最大收缩幅度(relMCA)、瞳孔光反应(PLR)潜伏期和瞳孔逃逸来评估彩色瞳孔运动测量(CPC)在区分健康人视神经病变(ON)和识别特定ON亚型方面的诊断潜力。方法:CPC测试采用中央(0°)和外周(20°)位置的红色和蓝色刺激来测量relMCA、潜伏期和瞳孔逃逸。我们检测了各种ON病因的患者,包括青光眼(n = 20)、脑膜瘤压迫视神经(n = 18)、交叉压迫(n = 4)、Leber遗传性视神经病变(LHON, n = 4)和常染色体显性视神经萎缩(ADOA, n = 3)。使用线性混合效应模型和临时Tukey检验来分析ON病因亚组和健康对照组(n = 40)在信号偏心率和位置方面的差异。结果:中枢红色刺激时ON患者瞳孔逸出率显著增高(p = 0.0007)。与对照组相比,青光眼和脑膜瘤组在两种刺激下均表现出relMCA减少和潜伏期延长(p结论:CPC能有效区分青光眼和脑膜瘤与健康对照组,但在区分ON亚型方面不太可靠。我们的研究结果表明,中央瞳孔逃逸与内视网膜功能障碍有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Documenta Ophthalmologica
Documenta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
21.40%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Documenta Ophthalmologica is an official publication of the International Society for Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision. The purpose of the journal is to promote the understanding and application of clinical electrophysiology of vision. Documenta Ophthalmologica will publish reviews, research articles, technical notes, brief reports and case studies which inform the readers about basic and clinical sciences related to visual electrodiagnosis and means to improve diagnosis and clinical management of patients using visual electrophysiology. Studies may involve animals or humans. In either case appropriate care must be taken to follow the Declaration of Helsinki for human subject or appropriate humane standards of animal care (e.g., the ARVO standards on Animal Care and Use).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信