Linking reinforcement learning, working memory, and choice dynamics to age and symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescence

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-10-08 DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101626
Erik R. Frogner , Andreas Dahl , Rikka Kjelkenes , Torgeir Moberget , Anne G.E. Collins , Lars T. Westlye , Mads L. Pedersen
{"title":"Linking reinforcement learning, working memory, and choice dynamics to age and symptoms of anxiety and depression in adolescence","authors":"Erik R. Frogner ,&nbsp;Andreas Dahl ,&nbsp;Rikka Kjelkenes ,&nbsp;Torgeir Moberget ,&nbsp;Anne G.E. Collins ,&nbsp;Lars T. Westlye ,&nbsp;Mads L. Pedersen","doi":"10.1016/j.dcn.2025.101626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Adolescence is a sensitive period characterized by significant neurocognitive development, with important implications for learning and decision-making. Working memory and reinforcement learning are essential for decision making and real-life dynamic adaptation to the environment and are often affected in individuals with anxiety and depression. Using a cognitive computational approach, we investigated associations between working memory, reinforcement learning, age, and symptoms of generalized anxiety and depression in 193 adolescents aged 12–24 years. Participants completed the Reinforcement Learning Working Memory (RLWM) task. To gain insight into the dynamics underlying instrumental learning behavior, we employed a computational model that combines the RLWM model with a Linear Ballistic Accumulator (RLWM-LBA), to quantify processes related to working memory and reinforcement learning, as well as choice dynamics underlying reaction times. We observed an age-related increase in task performance, but no differences depending on symptoms. Bayesian regression models revealed strong evidence for an association between age and the start point variability parameter of the LBA module, suggesting reduced choice stochasticity in older adolescents. In line with the behavioral findings, we found anecdotal to moderate evidence for no associations between RLWM-LBA parameters and symptom sum scores. Lastly, we trained regression models testing the utility of RLWM-LBA parameters for predicting age and symptom burden, yielding poor predictive performance. This study highlights differences in choice dynamics underlying age-related improvements in instrumental learning, while finding that cognitive differences identified in case-control studies did not generalize to symptom variation in this sample from the general adolescent population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49083,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 101626"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878929325001227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescence is a sensitive period characterized by significant neurocognitive development, with important implications for learning and decision-making. Working memory and reinforcement learning are essential for decision making and real-life dynamic adaptation to the environment and are often affected in individuals with anxiety and depression. Using a cognitive computational approach, we investigated associations between working memory, reinforcement learning, age, and symptoms of generalized anxiety and depression in 193 adolescents aged 12–24 years. Participants completed the Reinforcement Learning Working Memory (RLWM) task. To gain insight into the dynamics underlying instrumental learning behavior, we employed a computational model that combines the RLWM model with a Linear Ballistic Accumulator (RLWM-LBA), to quantify processes related to working memory and reinforcement learning, as well as choice dynamics underlying reaction times. We observed an age-related increase in task performance, but no differences depending on symptoms. Bayesian regression models revealed strong evidence for an association between age and the start point variability parameter of the LBA module, suggesting reduced choice stochasticity in older adolescents. In line with the behavioral findings, we found anecdotal to moderate evidence for no associations between RLWM-LBA parameters and symptom sum scores. Lastly, we trained regression models testing the utility of RLWM-LBA parameters for predicting age and symptom burden, yielding poor predictive performance. This study highlights differences in choice dynamics underlying age-related improvements in instrumental learning, while finding that cognitive differences identified in case-control studies did not generalize to symptom variation in this sample from the general adolescent population.
将强化学习、工作记忆和选择动态与年龄和青春期焦虑和抑郁症状联系起来。
青春期是神经认知发育的敏感时期,对学习和决策具有重要意义。工作记忆和强化学习对于决策和现实生活中对环境的动态适应至关重要,并且经常受到焦虑和抑郁个体的影响。使用认知计算方法,我们调查了193名12-24岁青少年的工作记忆、强化学习、年龄和广泛性焦虑和抑郁症状之间的关系。参与者完成了强化学习工作记忆(RLWM)任务。为了深入了解工具学习行为背后的动态,我们采用了一个将RLWM模型与线性弹道累加器(RLWM- lba)相结合的计算模型,来量化与工作记忆和强化学习相关的过程,以及反应时间背后的选择动态。我们观察到与年龄相关的任务表现增加,但没有取决于症状的差异。贝叶斯回归模型显示,年龄与LBA模块的起始点变异性参数之间存在关联,表明年龄较大的青少年的选择随机性降低。与行为学研究结果一致,我们发现RLWM-LBA参数与症状总和评分之间没有关联的轶事到中等证据。最后,我们训练回归模型来测试RLWM-LBA参数在预测年龄和症状负担方面的效用,但预测效果不佳。本研究强调了器乐学习中与年龄相关的进步背后的选择动力差异,同时发现在病例对照研究中发现的认知差异并没有推广到来自一般青少年人群的样本的症状变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.60%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes theoretical and research papers on cognitive brain development, from infancy through childhood and adolescence and into adulthood. It covers neurocognitive development and neurocognitive processing in both typical and atypical development, including social and affective aspects. Appropriate methodologies for the journal include, but are not limited to, functional neuroimaging (fMRI and MEG), electrophysiology (EEG and ERP), NIRS and transcranial magnetic stimulation, as well as other basic neuroscience approaches using cellular and animal models that directly address cognitive brain development, patient studies, case studies, post-mortem studies and pharmacological studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书