Adherence to mHealth quit smoking application 'stopcoach' on top of evidence based smoking cessation counselling: association with participant characteristics and long-term abstinence.
Anne Zijp, Daan L de Frel, Bas van den Putte, Eline Heemskerk, Niels H Chavannes, Sander Hermsen, Sigrid Troelstra, Eline Meijer
{"title":"Adherence to mHealth quit smoking application 'stopcoach' on top of evidence based smoking cessation counselling: association with participant characteristics and long-term abstinence.","authors":"Anne Zijp, Daan L de Frel, Bas van den Putte, Eline Heemskerk, Niels H Chavannes, Sander Hermsen, Sigrid Troelstra, Eline Meijer","doi":"10.1186/s13011-025-00672-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smoking is more common in lower socioeconomic position (SEP) groups, but smoking cessation interventions are less effective for these groups. StopCoach, an mHealth intervention, supports people with lower SEP in quitting smoking. A non-randomized controlled trial found that adding StopCoach to accredited smoking cessation counselling (SCC) led to higher abstinence rates immediately after and one year after SCC, compared to SCC alone. Users also rated its usability, acceptability, and practicality positively. Recent studies show a dose-response relationship, where more mHealth use improves smoking cessation outcomes. Since adherence is a challenge and often underreported, understanding adherence factors is crucial in evaluating eHealth intervention effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to assess the association between participant characteristics and StopCoach app adherence, as well as the association between app adherence and (short- and long-term) abstinence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Main outcomes are app adherence and abstinence. All participants (N = 132) were enrolled in group-based SCC. The association between user characteristics and adherence was estimated with logistic regression models. Chi-square tests were performed to test the association between app adherence and self-reported smoking abstinence. Short-term and long-term abstinence were defined as 4 weeks and 1 year after the quit date, respectively. App adherence was defined as the number of steps completed by a participant in the app.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older users and those who had attended all SCC meetings were significantly more likely to be adherent to the app. More app-adherent participants were significantly more likely to be abstinent 1 year after the quit date. This association was non-significant at 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results indicate that mHealth interventions such as StopCoach may increase the effectiveness of traditional SCC programs. Users could benefit from further integration of StopCoach in SCC programs, as this could motivate them to be more adherent to StopCoach, resulting in them quitting successfully.</p>","PeriodicalId":22041,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","volume":"20 1","pages":"44"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-025-00672-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Smoking is more common in lower socioeconomic position (SEP) groups, but smoking cessation interventions are less effective for these groups. StopCoach, an mHealth intervention, supports people with lower SEP in quitting smoking. A non-randomized controlled trial found that adding StopCoach to accredited smoking cessation counselling (SCC) led to higher abstinence rates immediately after and one year after SCC, compared to SCC alone. Users also rated its usability, acceptability, and practicality positively. Recent studies show a dose-response relationship, where more mHealth use improves smoking cessation outcomes. Since adherence is a challenge and often underreported, understanding adherence factors is crucial in evaluating eHealth intervention effectiveness.
Aim: This study aims to assess the association between participant characteristics and StopCoach app adherence, as well as the association between app adherence and (short- and long-term) abstinence.
Methods: Main outcomes are app adherence and abstinence. All participants (N = 132) were enrolled in group-based SCC. The association between user characteristics and adherence was estimated with logistic regression models. Chi-square tests were performed to test the association between app adherence and self-reported smoking abstinence. Short-term and long-term abstinence were defined as 4 weeks and 1 year after the quit date, respectively. App adherence was defined as the number of steps completed by a participant in the app.
Results: Older users and those who had attended all SCC meetings were significantly more likely to be adherent to the app. More app-adherent participants were significantly more likely to be abstinent 1 year after the quit date. This association was non-significant at 4 weeks.
Conclusion: The results indicate that mHealth interventions such as StopCoach may increase the effectiveness of traditional SCC programs. Users could benefit from further integration of StopCoach in SCC programs, as this could motivate them to be more adherent to StopCoach, resulting in them quitting successfully.
期刊介绍:
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that encompasses research concerning substance abuse, with a focus on policy issues. The journal aims to provide an environment for the exchange of ideas, new research, consensus papers, and critical reviews, to bridge the established fields that share a mutual goal of reducing the harms from substance use. These fields include: legislation pertaining to substance use; correctional supervision of people with substance use disorder; medical treatment and screening; mental health services; research; and evaluation of substance use disorder programs.