Evaluating the introduction of workplace-based learning in a paediatric training programme: experience from Myanmar.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Marcus Wootton, Kyaw Linn, Kyaw Myo, Ian Maconochie, Tina Sajjanhar, Aye Han
{"title":"Evaluating the introduction of workplace-based learning in a paediatric training programme: experience from Myanmar.","authors":"Marcus Wootton, Kyaw Linn, Kyaw Myo, Ian Maconochie, Tina Sajjanhar, Aye Han","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Workplace-based learning (WPBL) for postgraduate paediatricians is well-established in advanced health systems but less so in low-resource settings. We evaluate the first WPBL pilot undertaken in paediatrics in Myanmar.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This cohort study assesses the implementation of WPBL among 85 postgraduate doctors from five medical universities in Myanmar.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>In 2018, Myanmar's paediatric medical leaders had outlined an ambitious plan to modernise learning at the postgraduate level through a multi-skilled <i>in-situ</i> approach. Supported by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH, UK), a co-designed pilot programme of WPBL was trialled in a structured way.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>This pilot was Myanmar-led, with UK experts providing support to Myanmar supervisors and to the 85 paediatric postgraduate doctors whom they mentored. Progress was documented through a co-designed, standardised 'portfolio of learning' that included well-established WPBL strategies.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>The quality of supervisor feedback in the portfolio to postgraduates was scored by independent assessors, as was the degree of completion of the portfolio, to determine adherence to the WPBL pilot objectives. Insights into the broader changes in practice resulting from the pilot were ascertained through a narrative commentary of moderated focus groups of both supervisors and postgraduates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>'Clinical' WPBL topics were more often chosen than 'softer' skill areas, for example, communication and leadership. Focus groups identified the benefits of a structured approach to learning, particularly in areas of weaker clinical performance. There were regional variations in how WPBL was delivered, with disparities between medical schools located in the north and those in the south, challenging WPBL standardisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Evidence on the impact of formalising WPBL in low-resource settings is minimal. This pilot demonstrates that setting up a WPBL programme is feasible in a low-resource setting, but it also presents challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003744","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Workplace-based learning (WPBL) for postgraduate paediatricians is well-established in advanced health systems but less so in low-resource settings. We evaluate the first WPBL pilot undertaken in paediatrics in Myanmar.

Design: This cohort study assesses the implementation of WPBL among 85 postgraduate doctors from five medical universities in Myanmar.

Setting: In 2018, Myanmar's paediatric medical leaders had outlined an ambitious plan to modernise learning at the postgraduate level through a multi-skilled in-situ approach. Supported by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH, UK), a co-designed pilot programme of WPBL was trialled in a structured way.

Interventions: This pilot was Myanmar-led, with UK experts providing support to Myanmar supervisors and to the 85 paediatric postgraduate doctors whom they mentored. Progress was documented through a co-designed, standardised 'portfolio of learning' that included well-established WPBL strategies.

Main outcome measures: The quality of supervisor feedback in the portfolio to postgraduates was scored by independent assessors, as was the degree of completion of the portfolio, to determine adherence to the WPBL pilot objectives. Insights into the broader changes in practice resulting from the pilot were ascertained through a narrative commentary of moderated focus groups of both supervisors and postgraduates.

Results: 'Clinical' WPBL topics were more often chosen than 'softer' skill areas, for example, communication and leadership. Focus groups identified the benefits of a structured approach to learning, particularly in areas of weaker clinical performance. There were regional variations in how WPBL was delivered, with disparities between medical schools located in the north and those in the south, challenging WPBL standardisation.

Conclusions: Evidence on the impact of formalising WPBL in low-resource settings is minimal. This pilot demonstrates that setting up a WPBL programme is feasible in a low-resource setting, but it also presents challenges.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评估在儿科培训方案中引入工作场所学习:来自缅甸的经验。
目的:面向研究生儿科医生的工作场所学习(WPBL)在先进的卫生系统中已经建立起来,但在资源匮乏的环境中还不太完善。我们评估了缅甸儿科开展的首个WPBL试点项目。设计:本队列研究评估缅甸五所医科大学的85名研究生医生实施WPBL的情况。环境:2018年,缅甸儿科医学领导人概述了一项雄心勃勃的计划,通过多技能现场方法实现研究生水平学习的现代化。在英国皇家儿科和儿童健康学院(RCPCH)的支持下,以一种结构化的方式对一项共同设计的WPBL试点方案进行了试验。干预措施:该试点由缅甸主导,英国专家向缅甸主管人员及其指导的85名儿科研究生医生提供支持。通过共同设计的标准化“学习组合”记录了进展,其中包括完善的WPBL策略。主要结果测量:由独立评估人员对研究生投资组合中导师反馈的质量进行评分,以及投资组合的完成程度,以确定对WPBL试点目标的遵守程度。通过对导师和研究生的适度焦点小组的叙述性评论,确定了对试点产生的更广泛的实践变化的见解。结果:“临床”WPBL主题比“软”技能领域(如沟通和领导)更常被选择。焦点小组确定了结构化学习方法的好处,特别是在临床表现较弱的领域。提供世界卫生组织教学的方式存在区域差异,北部和南部的医学院之间存在差异,这对世界卫生组织教学的标准化提出了挑战。结论:在低资源环境下,正式实施WPBL影响的证据很少。这一试点表明,在资源匮乏的环境下建立WPBL项目是可行的,但它也带来了挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信