Identification and Management of Binge-Eating Disorder and Bulimia Nervosa in Primary Care Settings: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals' and Patients' Perceptions.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Stella Kozmér, Christopher O'Rouke, Natalia S Lawrence, Jane R Smith, Samantha B van Beurden
{"title":"Identification and Management of Binge-Eating Disorder and Bulimia Nervosa in Primary Care Settings: A Qualitative Systematic Review of Healthcare Professionals' and Patients' Perceptions.","authors":"Stella Kozmér, Christopher O'Rouke, Natalia S Lawrence, Jane R Smith, Samantha B van Beurden","doi":"10.1002/eat.24568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand how the identification and management of binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in primary care settings are perceived by both patients and healthcare professionals, and how rates of identification and referral for support may be improved.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted. Eight databases were searched in August 2025. Studies were excluded if they focused on secondary or tertiary care, patients under the age of 16, or anorexia nervosa. Data on sample, type of eating disorder, year of publication, and country were extracted, and thematic synthesis was used to synthesize the data. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-five studies were included. Four articles were of high quality; the rest (N = 21) were medium with a moderate risk of bias. Most of the studies were from the United Kingdom (N = 9), with 14 focusing on healthcare professionals' and 13 on patients' perspectives. The main factors influencing the identification and management of BED/BN were identified to be knowledge and understanding of the conditions, healthcare professional-patient interactions, attitudes and emotions toward BED/BN and the healthcare system, and the existence and accessibility of treatment and referral pathways.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The interaction of these factors is discussed in relation to the literature, and gaps in research and clinical practice are identified, such as a limited separation of eating disorder categories, which could help inform the development of strategies to improve the identification and management of BED and BN.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24568","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand how the identification and management of binge-eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN) in primary care settings are perceived by both patients and healthcare professionals, and how rates of identification and referral for support may be improved.

Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted. Eight databases were searched in August 2025. Studies were excluded if they focused on secondary or tertiary care, patients under the age of 16, or anorexia nervosa. Data on sample, type of eating disorder, year of publication, and country were extracted, and thematic synthesis was used to synthesize the data. The quality of studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research.

Results: Twenty-five studies were included. Four articles were of high quality; the rest (N = 21) were medium with a moderate risk of bias. Most of the studies were from the United Kingdom (N = 9), with 14 focusing on healthcare professionals' and 13 on patients' perspectives. The main factors influencing the identification and management of BED/BN were identified to be knowledge and understanding of the conditions, healthcare professional-patient interactions, attitudes and emotions toward BED/BN and the healthcare system, and the existence and accessibility of treatment and referral pathways.

Discussion: The interaction of these factors is discussed in relation to the literature, and gaps in research and clinical practice are identified, such as a limited separation of eating disorder categories, which could help inform the development of strategies to improve the identification and management of BED and BN.

初级保健机构中暴食症和神经性贪食症的识别和管理:医疗保健专业人员和患者认知的定性系统回顾。
目的:了解初级保健机构中暴饮暴食症(BED)和神经性贪食症(BN)的识别和管理如何被患者和卫生保健专业人员感知,以及如何提高识别率和转诊率。方法:对定性研究进行系统回顾。在2025年8月检索了8个数据库。如果研究集中于二级或三级护理、16岁以下患者或神经性厌食症,则排除。提取样本、饮食失调类型、出版年份和国家等数据,采用专题综合方法对数据进行综合。使用定性研究的关键评估技能计划检查表评估研究的质量。结果:纳入25项研究。4篇文章质量高;其余(N = 21)为中等偏倚风险。大多数研究来自英国(N = 9),其中14项关注医疗保健专业人员的观点,13项关注患者的观点。影响BED/BN识别和管理的主要因素是对病情的认识和理解、医护人员与患者的互动、对BED/BN和医疗系统的态度和情绪,以及治疗和转诊途径的存在和可及性。讨论:这些因素的相互作用讨论了相关的文献,并确定了研究和临床实践中的差距,如有限的饮食障碍类别的分离,这可能有助于制定策略,以改善BED和BN的识别和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信