Reassessing the Role of the Subarcuate Artery in Hearing Preservation during Microvascular Decompression.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2025-12-15 Epub Date: 2025-10-10 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0159
Takenori Kato, Toshinori Hasegawa, Akihiro Mizuno, Takehiro Naito, Hiroyuki Oishi, Naofumi Kosaka
{"title":"Reassessing the Role of the Subarcuate Artery in Hearing Preservation during Microvascular Decompression.","authors":"Takenori Kato, Toshinori Hasegawa, Akihiro Mizuno, Takehiro Naito, Hiroyuki Oishi, Naofumi Kosaka","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The subarcuate artery, a branch of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, has traditionally been considered a nonessential vessel whose sacrifice during cerebellopontine angle surgery is believed to produce no sequelae. Despite anatomical studies documenting the course and distribution of the subarcuate artery, no clinical reports have directly linked subarcuate artery injury to hearing impairment, reinforcing this traditional understanding. We retrospectively analyzed 3 cases of hearing impairment following subarcuate artery injury during microvascular decompression procedures, drawn from a series of 109 surgeries performed between January 2011 and December 2024 at our institution. All patients underwent continuous intraoperative auditory brainstem response monitoring, with detailed documentation of vascular events and corresponding signal changes. In all cases, intraoperative assessment confirmed that the labyrinthine artery remained intact, whereas the subarcuate artery was compromised. Each patient showed delayed auditory brainstem response deterioration, with complete signal loss occurring within 15-20 min after subarcuate artery manipulation. In 2 cases, deliberate transection or inadvertent avulsion of the subarcuate artery resulted in complete and permanent hearing loss. In the third case, a bleeding subarcuate artery was managed using compression hemostasis without coagulation, and serviceable hearing was preserved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical evidence that subarcuate artery injury can lead to hearing impairment, challenging the conventional understanding. The delayed auditory brainstem response deterioration pattern suggests that subarcuate artery injury affects inner ear perfusion through anastomotic connections with the labyrinthine artery, particularly in patients with anatomical variations. Therefore, we recommend preserving the subarcuate artery whenever possible to minimize the risk of postoperative hearing deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"560-567"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12799346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0159","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subarcuate artery, a branch of the anterior inferior cerebellar artery, has traditionally been considered a nonessential vessel whose sacrifice during cerebellopontine angle surgery is believed to produce no sequelae. Despite anatomical studies documenting the course and distribution of the subarcuate artery, no clinical reports have directly linked subarcuate artery injury to hearing impairment, reinforcing this traditional understanding. We retrospectively analyzed 3 cases of hearing impairment following subarcuate artery injury during microvascular decompression procedures, drawn from a series of 109 surgeries performed between January 2011 and December 2024 at our institution. All patients underwent continuous intraoperative auditory brainstem response monitoring, with detailed documentation of vascular events and corresponding signal changes. In all cases, intraoperative assessment confirmed that the labyrinthine artery remained intact, whereas the subarcuate artery was compromised. Each patient showed delayed auditory brainstem response deterioration, with complete signal loss occurring within 15-20 min after subarcuate artery manipulation. In 2 cases, deliberate transection or inadvertent avulsion of the subarcuate artery resulted in complete and permanent hearing loss. In the third case, a bleeding subarcuate artery was managed using compression hemostasis without coagulation, and serviceable hearing was preserved. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first clinical evidence that subarcuate artery injury can lead to hearing impairment, challenging the conventional understanding. The delayed auditory brainstem response deterioration pattern suggests that subarcuate artery injury affects inner ear perfusion through anastomotic connections with the labyrinthine artery, particularly in patients with anatomical variations. Therefore, we recommend preserving the subarcuate artery whenever possible to minimize the risk of postoperative hearing deficits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

重新评估弓形下动脉在微血管减压中听力保护的作用。
弓形下动脉是小脑前下动脉的一个分支,传统上认为它是一种非必需的血管,在桥小脑角手术中牺牲它不会产生后遗症。尽管解剖学研究记录了弓形下动脉的路线和分布,但没有临床报告将弓形下动脉损伤与听力障碍直接联系起来,这加强了这种传统的理解。我们回顾性分析了2011年1月至2024年12月在我院进行的109例微血管减压手术中弓形下动脉损伤后听力障碍的3例病例。所有患者均接受术中连续的听觉脑干反应监测,详细记录血管事件和相应的信号变化。在所有病例中,术中评估证实迷路动脉完好无损,而弓形下动脉受损。每位患者均表现为迟发性听觉脑干反应恶化,在弓形下动脉操作后15-20分钟内发生完全信号丧失。2例故意横断或无意撕脱弓下动脉,导致完全性和永久性听力丧失。在第三例病例中,弓形下动脉出血采用无凝血压迫止血,并保留了可用的听力。据我们所知,这是弓形下动脉损伤可导致听力损伤的第一个临床证据,挑战了传统的认识。延迟的听脑干反应恶化模式表明弓形下动脉损伤通过与迷路动脉的吻合连接影响内耳灌注,特别是在解剖变异的患者中。因此,我们建议尽可能保留弓下动脉,以减少术后听力损失的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书