Urgent Need for Pairing Training and Education With Fentanyl Test Strip Distribution.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Megan K Reed, Tracy Esteves Camacho, Kristin L Rising, Rose Laurano, Danielle Albaciete, Stephen E Lankenau
{"title":"Urgent Need for Pairing Training and Education With Fentanyl Test Strip Distribution.","authors":"Megan K Reed, Tracy Esteves Camacho, Kristin L Rising, Rose Laurano, Danielle Albaciete, Stephen E Lankenau","doi":"10.1111/dar.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are increasingly recommended for non-heroin drugs to detect potential fentanyl adulteration. The aim of this study was to better understand how people are using FTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In simulation exercises between September and October 2023, 40 people who used drugs participated in a mock use of FTS on a simulated drug, interpreted FTS results and completed interviews about their FTS use. Data were analysed in NVivo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to study enrolment, 80% of participants reported receiving training on using FTS, some had instructed others on their use, and 71% reported a positive result at the last use of a FTS on a non-heroin drug. During the simulation exercise, none of the participants used FTS as recommended: most under-diluted the sample or used the FTS in another manner not indicated. During the interpretation of FTS strip results, 45% correctly interpreted a positive test; 55% a negative test with clear lines; and 30% a negative test with a faint second line.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Observed errors in FTS simulations would likely lead to false positive results. Findings highlight the lack of appropriate training people have received and the need to develop educational approaches to ensure people use FTS properly to optimise their impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70049","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fentanyl test strips (FTS) are increasingly recommended for non-heroin drugs to detect potential fentanyl adulteration. The aim of this study was to better understand how people are using FTS.

Methods: In simulation exercises between September and October 2023, 40 people who used drugs participated in a mock use of FTS on a simulated drug, interpreted FTS results and completed interviews about their FTS use. Data were analysed in NVivo.

Results: Prior to study enrolment, 80% of participants reported receiving training on using FTS, some had instructed others on their use, and 71% reported a positive result at the last use of a FTS on a non-heroin drug. During the simulation exercise, none of the participants used FTS as recommended: most under-diluted the sample or used the FTS in another manner not indicated. During the interpretation of FTS strip results, 45% correctly interpreted a positive test; 55% a negative test with clear lines; and 30% a negative test with a faint second line.

Discussion and conclusions: Observed errors in FTS simulations would likely lead to false positive results. Findings highlight the lack of appropriate training people have received and the need to develop educational approaches to ensure people use FTS properly to optimise their impact.

培训和教育与芬太尼试纸分发的迫切需要。
芬太尼试纸(FTS)越来越多地被推荐用于非海洛因药物,以检测潜在的芬太尼掺假。这项研究的目的是为了更好地了解人们是如何使用FTS的。方法:在2023年9月至10月的模拟演习中,40名吸毒者参加了模拟药物FTS的模拟使用,解释FTS结果并完成了有关FTS使用情况的访谈。数据在NVivo中进行分析。结果:在研究入组之前,80%的参与者报告接受了使用FTS的培训,一些人指导其他人使用FTS, 71%的参与者报告在非海洛因药物上最后使用FTS的结果为阳性。在模拟练习中,没有参与者按照建议使用FTS:大多数人未充分稀释样品或以另一种未指示的方式使用FTS。在解释FTS条带结果时,45%的人正确解释了阳性测试;55%为阴性,线条清晰;30%呈阴性,并伴有微弱的二线。讨论与结论:FTS模拟中观察到的误差可能导致假阳性结果。调查结果突出表明,人们缺乏接受过的适当培训,需要制定教育方法,以确保人们正确使用FTS,以最大限度地发挥其影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信