Applying Machine Learning to Predict Complex Clinical Course in Youth With Eating Disorders.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Stephanie Ryall, Abigail Bradley, Khaled El Emam, Nicole Obeid
{"title":"Applying Machine Learning to Predict Complex Clinical Course in Youth With Eating Disorders.","authors":"Stephanie Ryall, Abigail Bradley, Khaled El Emam, Nicole Obeid","doi":"10.1002/eat.24570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of supervised machine learning models to logistic regression in identifying youth with eating disorders at risk of a complex clinical course based on clinical characteristics from the first treatment episode.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical data from 327 youth treated at any level of care at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Eating Disorders Program (2018-2024) were extracted. Complex clinical course outcome was defined as either readmission after discharge or a treatment trajectory deviating from the expected step-down in intensity, including return to the same or escalation to a higher level of care. Thirty-four intake and discharge variables from the first treatment episode were used to train seven machine learning models and logistic regression using repeated nested cross-validation. Performance was assessed by AUC and brier scores. Models using intake-only versus intake plus discharge data were compared. A parsimonious model using the top 10 predictors was also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Random forest model with intake and discharge data achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.723; Brier = 0.176) that was significantly superior to logistic regression. Models trained on intake-only data showed poor discrimination (AUCs < 0.6). Including discharge data improved model performance across all algorithms. The most important predictor was weight change throughout treatment. Random forest performance declined when restricted to the top 10 predictors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Supervised machine learning demonstrates improved predictive performance for eating disorder disease course outcomes compared to traditional statistical methods, especially in higher-dimensionality settings. These findings support future application of machine learning to complex biopsychosocial datasets to advance precision medicine initiatives in the eating disorder field and better understand the etiology of disease trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24570","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the predictive performance of supervised machine learning models to logistic regression in identifying youth with eating disorders at risk of a complex clinical course based on clinical characteristics from the first treatment episode.

Methods: Clinical data from 327 youth treated at any level of care at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Eating Disorders Program (2018-2024) were extracted. Complex clinical course outcome was defined as either readmission after discharge or a treatment trajectory deviating from the expected step-down in intensity, including return to the same or escalation to a higher level of care. Thirty-four intake and discharge variables from the first treatment episode were used to train seven machine learning models and logistic regression using repeated nested cross-validation. Performance was assessed by AUC and brier scores. Models using intake-only versus intake plus discharge data were compared. A parsimonious model using the top 10 predictors was also evaluated.

Results: Random forest model with intake and discharge data achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.723; Brier = 0.176) that was significantly superior to logistic regression. Models trained on intake-only data showed poor discrimination (AUCs < 0.6). Including discharge data improved model performance across all algorithms. The most important predictor was weight change throughout treatment. Random forest performance declined when restricted to the top 10 predictors.

Discussion: Supervised machine learning demonstrates improved predictive performance for eating disorder disease course outcomes compared to traditional statistical methods, especially in higher-dimensionality settings. These findings support future application of machine learning to complex biopsychosocial datasets to advance precision medicine initiatives in the eating disorder field and better understand the etiology of disease trajectory.

应用机器学习预测青少年饮食失调的复杂临床过程。
目的:比较监督机器学习模型与逻辑回归模型在基于首次治疗发作的临床特征识别有复杂临床病程风险的饮食失调青年方面的预测性能。方法:提取安大略省东部儿童医院饮食失调项目(2018-2024)327名青少年的临床数据。复杂的临床过程结局被定义为出院后再入院或治疗轨迹偏离预期的强度下降,包括恢复到相同或升级到更高的护理水平。使用第一次治疗发作的34个摄入和排出变量来训练7个机器学习模型,并使用重复嵌套交叉验证进行逻辑回归。以AUC和brier评分评估表现。只使用进气数据的模型与使用进气加排放数据的模型进行了比较。使用前10个预测因子的简约模型也进行了评估。结果:随机森林模型的进料和出料性能最佳(AUC = 0.723; Brier = 0.176),显著优于logistic回归。讨论:与传统的统计方法相比,有监督的机器学习对饮食失调疾病病程结果的预测性能有所提高,特别是在更高维度的环境中。这些发现支持未来将机器学习应用于复杂的生物心理社会数据集,以推进饮食失调领域的精准医学倡议,并更好地了解疾病轨迹的病因学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
12.70%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信