Advances in Metastatic Disease Spinal Oncology: Novel Technology Without Forgetting the Fundamentals of Surgical Treatment.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2550476.238
Harsh Jain, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Ilya Laufer, Scott L Zuckerman
{"title":"Advances in Metastatic Disease Spinal Oncology: Novel Technology Without Forgetting the Fundamentals of Surgical Treatment.","authors":"Harsh Jain, Ranbir Ahluwalia, Ilya Laufer, Scott L Zuckerman","doi":"10.14245/ns.2550476.238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Metastatic spine disease represents a growing therapeutic challenge that demands a balance between incorporating emerging technologies while respecting the fundamental principles during clinical decision-making. Advances in adjuvant therapies, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy, have significantly improved long-term patient survival. Surgical decision-making should be guided by well-established frameworks such as the NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, systemic) criteria, the ESCC (epidural spinal cord compression) scale, and the SINS (spinal instability neoplastic score), ensuring a structured and evidence-based approach to treatment. The integration of minimally invasive techniques, including percutaneous instrumentation, ablation techniques, and biportal endoscopic approaches, has reduced surgical morbidity and facilitated faster recovery. Additionally, carbon fiber implants are revolutionizing spinal stabilization by allowing better postoperative visualization of any local recurrence and easier radiation planning. SBRT has emerged as a critical modality, offering precise, high-dose radiation with minimal toxicity to the spinal cord, improving local tumor control and patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach remains paramount, requiring collaboration between spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of metastatic spine tumor management, focusing on: (1) fundamentals of metastatic spine care, (2) minimally invasive surgical techniques, (3) the use of carbon fiber screws, (4) SBRT, and (5) ways to maximize patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"22 3","pages":"829-845"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518916/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550476.238","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Metastatic spine disease represents a growing therapeutic challenge that demands a balance between incorporating emerging technologies while respecting the fundamental principles during clinical decision-making. Advances in adjuvant therapies, including stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and chemotherapy, have significantly improved long-term patient survival. Surgical decision-making should be guided by well-established frameworks such as the NOMS (neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, systemic) criteria, the ESCC (epidural spinal cord compression) scale, and the SINS (spinal instability neoplastic score), ensuring a structured and evidence-based approach to treatment. The integration of minimally invasive techniques, including percutaneous instrumentation, ablation techniques, and biportal endoscopic approaches, has reduced surgical morbidity and facilitated faster recovery. Additionally, carbon fiber implants are revolutionizing spinal stabilization by allowing better postoperative visualization of any local recurrence and easier radiation planning. SBRT has emerged as a critical modality, offering precise, high-dose radiation with minimal toxicity to the spinal cord, improving local tumor control and patient outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach remains paramount, requiring collaboration between spine surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In this narrative review, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of metastatic spine tumor management, focusing on: (1) fundamentals of metastatic spine care, (2) minimally invasive surgical techniques, (3) the use of carbon fiber screws, (4) SBRT, and (5) ways to maximize patient safety.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

脊柱肿瘤转移性疾病的进展:新技术不忘手术治疗的基础。
转移性脊柱疾病是一种日益增长的治疗挑战,需要在纳入新兴技术和尊重临床决策基本原则之间取得平衡。辅助治疗的进步,包括立体定向体放疗(SBRT)和化疗,显著提高了患者的长期生存率。手术决策应以完善的框架为指导,如NOMS(神经学、肿瘤学、机械、系统)标准、ESCC(硬膜外脊髓压迫)评分和SINS(脊柱不稳定肿瘤评分),以确保结构化和循证治疗方法。微创技术的整合,包括经皮内固定、消融技术和双门静脉内窥镜入路,降低了手术发病率,促进了更快的恢复。此外,碳纤维植入物通过更好地观察术后任何局部复发和更容易的放射计划,彻底改变了脊柱稳定。SBRT已成为一种关键的方式,提供精确的高剂量辐射,对脊髓的毒性最小,改善局部肿瘤控制和患者预后。多学科方法仍然是最重要的,需要脊柱外科医生、放射肿瘤学家和内科肿瘤学家之间的合作。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们旨在全面概述脊柱转移性肿瘤治疗的现状,重点是:(1)转移性脊柱护理的基础,(2)微创手术技术,(3)碳纤维螺钉的使用,(4)SBRT,(5)最大化患者安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信