The Role of D-Wave Monitoring in Motor-Evoked Potential Loss During Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors Resection.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurospine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.14245/ns.2550594.297
Hangeul Park, Woojin Kim, Jungbo Sim, Ho Sung Myeong, Young Doo Choi, Gilho Kwak, Bo Eun Kim, Jeongeum Park, Sung-Min Kim, Keewon Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim
{"title":"The Role of D-Wave Monitoring in Motor-Evoked Potential Loss During Intramedullary Spinal Cord Tumors Resection.","authors":"Hangeul Park, Woojin Kim, Jungbo Sim, Ho Sung Myeong, Young Doo Choi, Gilho Kwak, Bo Eun Kim, Jeongeum Park, Sung-Min Kim, Keewon Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park, Jun-Hoe Kim, Chang-Hyun Lee, Chun Kee Chung, Chi Heon Kim","doi":"10.14245/ns.2550594.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Motor-evoked potential (MEP) loss during intramedullary (IM) spinal cord tumor surgery impairs the ability to monitor further neural injury. Direct wave (D-wave) monitoring may allow continued assessment of corticospinal tract integrity after MEP loss. This study evaluates the role of D-wave-guided surgery in preserving function and enabling safe resection after MEP loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients with ependymoma (EPN), cavernous angioma (CA) or subependymoma who experienced MEP loss during IM tumor resection between January 2012 and May 2025. Patients who underwent continued resection under D-wave guidance after MEP loss were compared with those who did not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 37 eligible patients, 9 underwent D-wave-guided surgery and 28 did not. Functional improvement at the last follow-up was more frequent in the D-wave-guided surgery group (66.7% vs. 17.9%, p=0.011). This trend remained significant in EPN patients (74.4% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003), but not in CA patients. Immediate postoperative motor grade ≤3 was more common in the D-wave-guided surgery group (66.7% vs. 39.3%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.251). By last follow-up, the proportions of patients self-ambulatory without external aids (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p=1.000) were similar between groups. Extent of resection, complications, and recurrence rates showed no significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>D-wave-guided surgery may enable safe continuation of tumor resection after MEP loss without increasing morbidity. It offers a viable intraoperative strategy to preserve long-term motor function by extending monitoring beyond MEP limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":19269,"journal":{"name":"Neurospine","volume":"22 3","pages":"650-662"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurospine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2550594.297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Motor-evoked potential (MEP) loss during intramedullary (IM) spinal cord tumor surgery impairs the ability to monitor further neural injury. Direct wave (D-wave) monitoring may allow continued assessment of corticospinal tract integrity after MEP loss. This study evaluates the role of D-wave-guided surgery in preserving function and enabling safe resection after MEP loss.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted in adult patients with ependymoma (EPN), cavernous angioma (CA) or subependymoma who experienced MEP loss during IM tumor resection between January 2012 and May 2025. Patients who underwent continued resection under D-wave guidance after MEP loss were compared with those who did not.

Results: Among 37 eligible patients, 9 underwent D-wave-guided surgery and 28 did not. Functional improvement at the last follow-up was more frequent in the D-wave-guided surgery group (66.7% vs. 17.9%, p=0.011). This trend remained significant in EPN patients (74.4% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003), but not in CA patients. Immediate postoperative motor grade ≤3 was more common in the D-wave-guided surgery group (66.7% vs. 39.3%), although this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.251). By last follow-up, the proportions of patients self-ambulatory without external aids (88.9% vs. 89.3%, p=1.000) were similar between groups. Extent of resection, complications, and recurrence rates showed no significant differences.

Conclusion: D-wave-guided surgery may enable safe continuation of tumor resection after MEP loss without increasing morbidity. It offers a viable intraoperative strategy to preserve long-term motor function by extending monitoring beyond MEP limitations.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

d波监测在脊髓髓内肿瘤切除过程中运动诱发电位损失中的作用。
目的:髓内(IM)脊髓肿瘤手术中运动诱发电位(MEP)的丢失损害了进一步神经损伤的监测能力。直接波(d波)监测可以在MEP丧失后继续评估皮质脊髓束完整性。本研究评估了d波引导手术在MEP丢失后保留功能和实现安全切除中的作用。方法:回顾性研究了2012年1月至2025年5月期间在IM肿瘤切除术中发生MEP丢失的成年室管膜瘤(EPN)、海绵状血管瘤(CA)或室管膜下瘤患者。对MEP丢失后在d波引导下继续切除的患者进行比较。结果:在37例符合条件的患者中,9例接受了d波引导手术,28例未接受手术。最后一次随访时,d波引导手术组功能改善更频繁(66.7% vs. 17.9%, p=0.011)。这一趋势在EPN患者中仍然显著(74.4% vs. 9.1%, p=0.003),但在CA患者中不明显。d波引导手术组术后立即运动等级≤3级更常见(66.7%比39.3%),但差异无统计学意义(p=0.251)。末次随访时,两组患者无辅助设备自行走动的比例(88.9% vs 89.3%, p=1.000)相似。手术切除程度、并发症及复发率无明显差异。结论:d波引导手术可以使MEP丢失后的肿瘤安全继续切除,而不会增加发病率。它提供了一种可行的术中策略,通过延长MEP限制的监测来保持长期的运动功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurospine
Neurospine Multiple-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
18.80%
发文量
93
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信