Predictors of Long-Term Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Receipt Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Problematic Alcohol Use.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Silke Behrendt, Alexis Kuerbis, Anna Mejldal, Jens Søndergaard, Kjeld Andersen, Ulrik Becker, Marie Holm Eliasen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen
{"title":"Predictors of Long-Term Alcohol Use Disorder Treatment Receipt Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults With Problematic Alcohol Use.","authors":"Silke Behrendt, Alexis Kuerbis, Anna Mejldal, Jens Søndergaard, Kjeld Andersen, Ulrik Becker, Marie Holm Eliasen, Anette Søgaard Nielsen","doi":"10.1111/dar.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross-sectional evidence shows that alcohol use disorders (AUD) are under-treated. Knowledge is needed on longitudinal predictors of long-term receipt of AUD treatment among older adults.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To identify the: (i) long-term occurrence of AUD treatment receipt during follow-up; (ii) time to treatment; and (iii) predictors of long-term treatment receipt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal cohort study. To create a baseline, a subsample from the Danish National Health Survey 2017 with a positive CAGE-C (n = 13,489, aged 55-80 years) was enriched with Danish national register data. AUD treatment data covered a follow-up period of up to 2.9 years following this baseline and came from the National Alcohol Treatment Register. Longitudinal predictors of treatment receipt were investigated with Cox regression analysis; time-to-treatment with Kaplan Meier curves. All analyses were conducted in the whole sample, in a subsample scoring ≥ 2 on the original CAGE (n = 3748, 28.9%), and in a subsample endorsing the CAGE-'Eye-opener'-criterion (n = 707, 6.2%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the whole sample, only 1.3% received AUD treatment in the follow-up period (3.9% in the CAGE- and 7.3% in the 'Eye-Opener'-criterion subsample). Across all samples, only about 40% of treatments were initiated by 12 months after baseline. Baseline contacts with health care providers and impaired well-being predicted a greater rate of treatment entry during follow-up (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Among older adults, AUD treatment uptake in the 2.9 years after reporting recent problematic alcohol use is rare. Treatment occurs with delay, regardless of problem severity. Contacts with health care providers are opportunities to support subsequent treatment receipt.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cross-sectional evidence shows that alcohol use disorders (AUD) are under-treated. Knowledge is needed on longitudinal predictors of long-term receipt of AUD treatment among older adults.

Aims: To identify the: (i) long-term occurrence of AUD treatment receipt during follow-up; (ii) time to treatment; and (iii) predictors of long-term treatment receipt.

Methods: Longitudinal cohort study. To create a baseline, a subsample from the Danish National Health Survey 2017 with a positive CAGE-C (n = 13,489, aged 55-80 years) was enriched with Danish national register data. AUD treatment data covered a follow-up period of up to 2.9 years following this baseline and came from the National Alcohol Treatment Register. Longitudinal predictors of treatment receipt were investigated with Cox regression analysis; time-to-treatment with Kaplan Meier curves. All analyses were conducted in the whole sample, in a subsample scoring ≥ 2 on the original CAGE (n = 3748, 28.9%), and in a subsample endorsing the CAGE-'Eye-opener'-criterion (n = 707, 6.2%).

Results: In the whole sample, only 1.3% received AUD treatment in the follow-up period (3.9% in the CAGE- and 7.3% in the 'Eye-Opener'-criterion subsample). Across all samples, only about 40% of treatments were initiated by 12 months after baseline. Baseline contacts with health care providers and impaired well-being predicted a greater rate of treatment entry during follow-up (p < 0.05).

Discussion and conclusions: Among older adults, AUD treatment uptake in the 2.9 years after reporting recent problematic alcohol use is rare. Treatment occurs with delay, regardless of problem severity. Contacts with health care providers are opportunities to support subsequent treatment receipt.

中老年酒精使用问题患者长期酒精使用障碍治疗接受的预测因素
横断面证据显示酒精使用障碍(AUD)治疗不足。需要了解老年人长期接受AUD治疗的纵向预测因素。目的:确定:(i)随访期间长期发生AUD治疗收据;(ii)治疗时间;(3)长期接受治疗的预测因素。方法:纵向队列研究。为了创建基线,使用丹麦国家登记数据丰富了2017年丹麦国家健康调查中CAGE-C阳性的子样本(n = 13,489,年龄55-80岁)。AUD治疗数据涵盖了该基线后长达2.9年的随访期,来自国家酒精治疗登记册。采用Cox回归分析对治疗时间的纵向预测因素进行研究;Kaplan Meier曲线的治疗时间。所有的分析都是在整个样本中进行的,在原始CAGE评分≥2的子样本中(n = 3748, 28.9%),以及在认可CAGE-'Eye-opener'标准的子样本中(n = 707, 6.2%)。结果:在整个样本中,只有1.3%的患者在随访期间接受了AUD治疗(CAGE组为3.9%,“大开眼界”标准子样本为7.3%)。在所有样本中,只有约40%的治疗在基线后12个月开始。与卫生保健提供者的基线接触和受损的幸福感预示着随访期间更大的治疗进入率(p讨论和结论:在老年人中,报告最近有问题的酒精使用后2.9年内接受AUD治疗的情况很少。无论问题的严重程度如何,治疗都会延迟进行。与卫生保健提供者接触是支持后续治疗接受的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol review
Drug and alcohol review SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
151
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信