Potentials of energy-active windows with integrated airflow geometries for improved thermal comfort and energy efficiency

IF 7.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Syed Y. Mahdi , Mohammed Alhaji Mohammed , Ismail M. Budaiwi , Adel A. Abdou
{"title":"Potentials of energy-active windows with integrated airflow geometries for improved thermal comfort and energy efficiency","authors":"Syed Y. Mahdi ,&nbsp;Mohammed Alhaji Mohammed ,&nbsp;Ismail M. Budaiwi ,&nbsp;Adel A. Abdou","doi":"10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.116567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Optimizing building envelope systems is essential for improving energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort, especially in hot climates with high cooling demand. This study evaluates the performance of an Energy-Active Window (EAW) system enhanced with internal airflow-modifying elements. Return air temperature (outflow), outflow–inflow temperature difference (ΔT), and inner glazing temperature were extracted from CFD steady-state simulations, while whole-building energy demand and occupant comfort were assessed via EnergyPlus using the Fanger PMV model. Optimized EAW configurations were compared to a base case and conventional glazing systems, including double, triple, and Low-E glazing. The square bar design (SA<sub>2</sub>), with three bars spaced 0.1 m apart in the outflow slot, showed the best performance, achieving a return air temperature of 39.04 °C and a ΔT of 16.06 °C. Reducing bar spacing to 0.05 m further improved ΔT to 16.45 °C, lowered the inner glazing temperature to 23.3 °C, and reduced the U-value to 0.12 W/m<sup>2</sup>·K. The optimized EAW reduced cooling demand by 24 % compared to double glazing, 18 % versus triple glazing, 14 % versus double Low-E, and 11 % versus triple Low-E, and 6.16 % over its base case. Comfort analysis confirmed better PMV values (–0.10, 0.07, 0.53) compared to more negative values (–1.46 in double glazing and –1.44 in triple glazing) in conventional systems. These findings identify the SA<sub>2</sub> configuration as a promising strategy for enhancing both energy performance and thermal comfort in energy-active window systems, while demonstrating a competitive advantage over conventional and Low-E glazing technologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11641,"journal":{"name":"Energy and Buildings","volume":"349 ","pages":"Article 116567"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and Buildings","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378778825012976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Optimizing building envelope systems is essential for improving energy efficiency and indoor thermal comfort, especially in hot climates with high cooling demand. This study evaluates the performance of an Energy-Active Window (EAW) system enhanced with internal airflow-modifying elements. Return air temperature (outflow), outflow–inflow temperature difference (ΔT), and inner glazing temperature were extracted from CFD steady-state simulations, while whole-building energy demand and occupant comfort were assessed via EnergyPlus using the Fanger PMV model. Optimized EAW configurations were compared to a base case and conventional glazing systems, including double, triple, and Low-E glazing. The square bar design (SA2), with three bars spaced 0.1 m apart in the outflow slot, showed the best performance, achieving a return air temperature of 39.04 °C and a ΔT of 16.06 °C. Reducing bar spacing to 0.05 m further improved ΔT to 16.45 °C, lowered the inner glazing temperature to 23.3 °C, and reduced the U-value to 0.12 W/m2·K. The optimized EAW reduced cooling demand by 24 % compared to double glazing, 18 % versus triple glazing, 14 % versus double Low-E, and 11 % versus triple Low-E, and 6.16 % over its base case. Comfort analysis confirmed better PMV values (–0.10, 0.07, 0.53) compared to more negative values (–1.46 in double glazing and –1.44 in triple glazing) in conventional systems. These findings identify the SA2 configuration as a promising strategy for enhancing both energy performance and thermal comfort in energy-active window systems, while demonstrating a competitive advantage over conventional and Low-E glazing technologies.
具有集成气流几何形状的节能窗户的潜力,可改善热舒适和能源效率
优化建筑围护结构系统对于提高能源效率和室内热舒适性至关重要,特别是在高制冷需求的炎热气候中。本研究评估了采用内部气流调节元件增强的能量主动窗(EAW)系统的性能。从CFD稳态模拟中提取回风温度(流出)、流出-流入温差(ΔT)和内部玻璃温度,同时通过EnergyPlus使用Fanger PMV模型评估整个建筑的能源需求和居住者舒适度。优化的EAW配置与基本情况和传统的玻璃系统进行了比较,包括双层、三层和Low-E玻璃。方形棒设计(SA2),在出风槽中有三个间隔0.1 m的棒,表现出最好的性能,回风温度为39.04℃,ΔT为16.06℃。将棒间距减小到0.05 m可进一步提高ΔT至16.45℃,内玻璃温度降至23.3℃,u值降至0.12 W/m2·K。与双层玻璃相比,优化后的EAW减少了24%的冷却需求,与三层玻璃相比减少了18%,与双层Low-E相比减少了14%,与三层Low-E相比减少了11%,与基本情况相比减少了6.16%。舒适性分析证实,传统系统的PMV值(-0.10,0.07,0.53)优于负值(双层玻璃-1.46,三层玻璃-1.44)。这些发现表明,SA2配置是一种很有前途的策略,可以提高能源主动窗系统的能源性能和热舒适性,同时显示出与传统和低e玻璃技术相比的竞争优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and Buildings
Energy and Buildings 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
11.90%
发文量
863
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: An international journal devoted to investigations of energy use and efficiency in buildings Energy and Buildings is an international journal publishing articles with explicit links to energy use in buildings. The aim is to present new research results, and new proven practice aimed at reducing the energy needs of a building and improving indoor environment quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信