Challenges and Experiences of Gastrostomy Patients and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Sevilay Senol Celik, Gamze Bozkul, Hande Nur Arslan
{"title":"Challenges and Experiences of Gastrostomy Patients and Their Caregivers: Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Sevilay Senol Celik, Gamze Bozkul, Hande Nur Arslan","doi":"10.1177/01939459251379704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are vital for providing long-term nutritional support to individuals unable to sustain sufficient oral intake. The use of PEG tubes causes significant difficulties for patients and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This systematic review and meta-synthesis investigated the challenges and experiences of patients with PEG tubes and their caregivers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted across databases including CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, TUBITAK-ULAKBIM, Dergipark, and TR Dizin. This study focused on studies published from 2004 to 2024. Twenty qualitative and mixed methods studies met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis has been used to identify significant themes and patterns within the selected studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three main themes and 6 subthemes emerged from the analysis: (1) Clinical challenges and support needs, including problems with the PEG tube and support and training needs; (2) psychological and emotional challenges, including perception of the PEG as a burden and stigma and social isolation; and (3) personal and social life, including impact on quality of life and economic challenges. These results revealed the complex nature of PEG care and illustrate the experiences and challenges of patients and carers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The management of gastrostomy care requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the clinical, economic, emotional, and psychosocial needs of patients and caregivers. Planning such as comprehensive education, emotional support, and financial assistance can improve the quality of life of patients and carers. Future research should focus on developing customized strategies to handle the specific caregiving challenges in this context.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"1939459251379704"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459251379704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are vital for providing long-term nutritional support to individuals unable to sustain sufficient oral intake. The use of PEG tubes causes significant difficulties for patients and their caregivers.

Objectives: This systematic review and meta-synthesis investigated the challenges and experiences of patients with PEG tubes and their caregivers.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-synthesis were conducted across databases including CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, PubMed, TUBITAK-ULAKBIM, Dergipark, and TR Dizin. This study focused on studies published from 2004 to 2024. Twenty qualitative and mixed methods studies met the inclusion criteria. Thematic analysis has been used to identify significant themes and patterns within the selected studies.

Results: Three main themes and 6 subthemes emerged from the analysis: (1) Clinical challenges and support needs, including problems with the PEG tube and support and training needs; (2) psychological and emotional challenges, including perception of the PEG as a burden and stigma and social isolation; and (3) personal and social life, including impact on quality of life and economic challenges. These results revealed the complex nature of PEG care and illustrate the experiences and challenges of patients and carers.

Conclusion: The management of gastrostomy care requires a comprehensive strategy that addresses the clinical, economic, emotional, and psychosocial needs of patients and caregivers. Planning such as comprehensive education, emotional support, and financial assistance can improve the quality of life of patients and carers. Future research should focus on developing customized strategies to handle the specific caregiving challenges in this context.

胃造口术患者及其护理人员的挑战和经验:系统回顾和综合。
背景:经皮内镜胃造口术(PEG)管对于无法维持足够口服摄入量的个体提供长期营养支持至关重要。PEG管的使用给患者及其护理人员带来了巨大的困难。目的:本系统综述和综合研究了PEG管患者及其护理人员的挑战和经验。方法:对CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、MEDLINE、PubMed、TUBITAK-ULAKBIM、Dergipark、TR Dizin等数据库进行系统综述和综合。这项研究的重点是2004年至2024年发表的研究。20项定性和混合方法研究符合纳入标准。专题分析已用于确定所选研究中的重要主题和模式。结果:从分析中得出了3个主要主题和6个次要主题:(1)临床挑战和支持需求,包括PEG管的问题和支持和培训需求;(2)心理和情感挑战,包括将PEG视为负担、耻辱和社会孤立;(3)个人和社会生活,包括对生活质量的影响和经济挑战。这些结果揭示了PEG护理的复杂性,并说明了患者和护理人员的经验和挑战。结论:胃造口护理的管理需要一个综合的策略,解决患者和护理人员的临床、经济、情感和社会心理需求。综合教育、情感支持和经济援助等计划可以改善患者和护理人员的生活质量。未来的研究应侧重于开发定制的策略来处理在这种情况下的具体护理挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信