12-week preoperative probiotic supplementation versus placebo: effects on inflammation, endotoxemia, adipokines, and gastrointestinal peptides in patients six months after bariatric surgery - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Marta Potrykus, Marcin Stanisławowski, Sylwia Czaja-Stolc, Anna Potrykus, Marta Stankiewicz, Anna Owczarzak, Marek Guzek, Michał Szymański, Igor Łoniewski, Krystian Adrych, Sylwia Małgorzewicz, Łukasz Kaska, Tomasz Ślebioda, Monika Proczko-Stepaniak
{"title":"12-week preoperative probiotic supplementation versus placebo: effects on inflammation, endotoxemia, adipokines, and gastrointestinal peptides in patients six months after bariatric surgery - a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.","authors":"Marta Potrykus, Marcin Stanisławowski, Sylwia Czaja-Stolc, Anna Potrykus, Marta Stankiewicz, Anna Owczarzak, Marek Guzek, Michał Szymański, Igor Łoniewski, Krystian Adrych, Sylwia Małgorzewicz, Łukasz Kaska, Tomasz Ślebioda, Monika Proczko-Stepaniak","doi":"10.1186/s12937-025-01217-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disruption in gut microbiota has been identified as a contributor to obesity-related inflammation and metabolic disorders. This study investigates the effects of preoperative probiotic supplementation on inflammation, endotoxemia, adipokines, and gastrointestinal peptides after bariatric surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Participants were randomized to receive a 12-week supplementation of either a probiotic mixture, Sanprobi Barrier, which contained nine strains of bacteria (Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51 and W52, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Levilactobacillus brevis W63, Lacticaseibacillus casei W56, Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, and Lactococcus lactis W58), or a placebo before surgery. The key outcomes measured at baseline and 6 months postoperatively included serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines (interleukin-6 - IL-6, interleukin-2 receptor-IL-2R, and C-reactive-CRP protein), adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin), and gastrointestinal peptides (glucagon-like peptide-1 - GLP-1, ghrelin, and trefoil factor 2). Relative mRNA expression of ghrelin and trefoil family factor 2 in gastric tissues was also analyzed at baseline and on the day of the surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the initial 110 participants, serum samples of 18 individuals in the probiotic group and 24 in the placebo group were analyzed. Both groups showed significant reductions in serum LPS levels six months after surgery; however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. Adiponectin levels increased significantly in the placebo group (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1 pg/mL; p < 0.001), while leptin levels decreased significantly in both groups without intergroup differences. IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group at 6 months (2.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 2.3 pg/mL; p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the remaining cytokine levels between the groups. Gastrointestinal peptides showed no significant differences between the groups, although GLP-1 levels improved within both groups. No changes were observed in ghrelin and trefoil factor 2 expression at the mRNA level.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative probiotic therapy was associated with significantly lower IL-6 levels compared to placebo six months after surgery, suggesting a potential anti-inflammatory effect. However, since the between-group difference in IL-6 changes from baseline was not statistically significant, the observed effect should be interpreted with caution. Other measured markers were not significantly affected, though low statistical power may have limited detection of subtle effects. These findings suggest that while probiotics may reduce certain inflammatory responses, their efficacy can be overshadowed by bariatric surgery impact. The further studies on this subject are warranted.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05407090).</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01217-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disruption in gut microbiota has been identified as a contributor to obesity-related inflammation and metabolic disorders. This study investigates the effects of preoperative probiotic supplementation on inflammation, endotoxemia, adipokines, and gastrointestinal peptides after bariatric surgery.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial included patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB). Participants were randomized to receive a 12-week supplementation of either a probiotic mixture, Sanprobi Barrier, which contained nine strains of bacteria (Bifidobacterium bifidum W23, Bifidobacterium lactis W51 and W52, Lactobacillus acidophilus W37, Levilactobacillus brevis W63, Lacticaseibacillus casei W56, Ligilactobacillus salivarius W24, Lactococcus lactis W19, and Lactococcus lactis W58), or a placebo before surgery. The key outcomes measured at baseline and 6 months postoperatively included serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS), cytokines (interleukin-6 - IL-6, interleukin-2 receptor-IL-2R, and C-reactive-CRP protein), adipokines (leptin, adiponectin, resistin), and gastrointestinal peptides (glucagon-like peptide-1 - GLP-1, ghrelin, and trefoil factor 2). Relative mRNA expression of ghrelin and trefoil family factor 2 in gastric tissues was also analyzed at baseline and on the day of the surgery.

Results: Out of the initial 110 participants, serum samples of 18 individuals in the probiotic group and 24 in the placebo group were analyzed. Both groups showed significant reductions in serum LPS levels six months after surgery; however, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. Adiponectin levels increased significantly in the placebo group (4.2 ± 2.3 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1 pg/mL; p < 0.001), while leptin levels decreased significantly in both groups without intergroup differences. IL-6 levels were significantly lower in the probiotic group compared to the placebo group at 6 months (2.2 ± 1.1 vs 4.2 ± 2.3 pg/mL; p = 0.004). No significant differences were observed in the remaining cytokine levels between the groups. Gastrointestinal peptides showed no significant differences between the groups, although GLP-1 levels improved within both groups. No changes were observed in ghrelin and trefoil factor 2 expression at the mRNA level.

Conclusions: Preoperative probiotic therapy was associated with significantly lower IL-6 levels compared to placebo six months after surgery, suggesting a potential anti-inflammatory effect. However, since the between-group difference in IL-6 changes from baseline was not statistically significant, the observed effect should be interpreted with caution. Other measured markers were not significantly affected, though low statistical power may have limited detection of subtle effects. These findings suggest that while probiotics may reduce certain inflammatory responses, their efficacy can be overshadowed by bariatric surgery impact. The further studies on this subject are warranted.

Trial registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05407090).

术前12周补充益生菌与安慰剂:对减肥手术后6个月患者炎症、内毒素血症、脂肪因子和胃肠道肽的影响——一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的临床试验。
背景:肠道微生物群的破坏已被确定为肥胖相关炎症和代谢紊乱的一个因素。本研究探讨了术前补充益生菌对减肥手术后炎症、内毒素血症、脂肪因子和胃肠道肽的影响。方法:这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的临床试验纳入了接受腹腔镜袖式胃切除术(LSG)或一次吻合胃旁路术(OAGB)的患者。参与者被随机分配接受12周的益生菌混合物补充,其中含有9株细菌(两歧双歧杆菌W23、乳酸双歧杆菌W51和W52、嗜酸乳杆菌W37、短乳酸杆菌W63、干酪乳杆菌W56、唾液乳酸杆菌W24、乳酸乳球菌W19和乳酸乳球菌W58),或在手术前服用安慰剂。在基线和术后6个月测量的主要结果包括血清脂多糖(LPS)、细胞因子(白介素-6 - IL-6、白介素-2受体- il - 2r和c反应性crp蛋白)、脂肪因子(瘦素、脂联素、抵抗素)和胃肠道肽(胰高血糖素样肽-1 - GLP-1、胃饥饿素和三叶因子2)。在基线和手术当日还分析胃组织中胃饥饿素和三叶家族因子2的相对mRNA表达。结果:在最初的110名参与者中,益生菌组的18名个体和安慰剂组的24名个体的血清样本进行了分析。两组患者术后6个月血清LPS水平均显著降低;然而,两组之间没有明显差异。结论:术前益生菌治疗与术后6个月安慰剂组相比,其IL-6水平显著降低,提示其具有潜在的抗炎作用。然而,由于组间IL-6变化与基线相比差异无统计学意义,因此观察到的效果应谨慎解释。其他测量的标记没有显著影响,尽管低统计能力可能对细微影响的检测有限。这些发现表明,虽然益生菌可以减少某些炎症反应,但它们的功效可能会被减肥手术的影响所掩盖。对这个问题的进一步研究是有必要的。试验注册:该研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT05407090)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition Journal
Nutrition Journal NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered. Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies. In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信