Analysis of Bovine Immunoglobulin G in Milk-Based Commodities: Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry vs. Affinity Liquid Chromatography.

IF 1.7
Stefan Ehling, Ujwal S Patil, Paul J Baker
{"title":"Analysis of Bovine Immunoglobulin G in Milk-Based Commodities: Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry vs. Affinity Liquid Chromatography.","authors":"Stefan Ehling, Ujwal S Patil, Paul J Baker","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current analytical methods for bovine immunoglobulin G (IgG) have certain limitations in terms of selectivity, reproducibility, and applicability to complex matrices. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using peptide-based quantitation and a suitable calibrant can potentially overcome some of these limitations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Commercial bovine IgG standards and colostrum powder were evaluated for suitability as calibrants. The feasibility of using a single peptide marker for quantitation of total IgG by LC-MS/MS was assessed in a range of milk-based commodities. The LC-MS/MS method was compared to AOAC method 2010.01, based on affinity liquid chromatography, with and without the casein precipitation step. Heat stability of bovine IgG in a model nutritional product was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>After dilution in buffer, reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion, a single IgG1 + 3 isoform-specific peptide was used for quantitation of total IgG. The corresponding isotopically labeled peptide was used for internal standardization. Colostrum powder was used as matrix-matched calibrant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linearity was demonstrated in the 5-500 mg/L total IgG range. Within-day and intermediate precision were <4% and <6%, respectively, in two milk-based matrices and recovery was 95-99%. Major differences were noted between the LC-MS/MS method and AOAC method 2010.01 with and without casein precipitation, caused by factors such as loss of IgG during casein precipitation and inclusion of partially denatured IgG in the result. Heat processing loss of bovine IgG in a nutritional product was ca. 25% by the LC-MS/MS method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The LC-MS/MS method is applicable to milk-based commodities and nutritional products as well. A higher fraction of IgG (including denatured IgG) is accessible to measurement by LC-MS/MS than by AOAC method 2010.01. Casein precipitation in whey-based matrices causes loss of IgG.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>A robust and widely applicable LC-MS/MS method using colostrum powder as calibrant and a single peptide marker for total IgG is being proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsaf095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current analytical methods for bovine immunoglobulin G (IgG) have certain limitations in terms of selectivity, reproducibility, and applicability to complex matrices. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using peptide-based quantitation and a suitable calibrant can potentially overcome some of these limitations.

Objective: Commercial bovine IgG standards and colostrum powder were evaluated for suitability as calibrants. The feasibility of using a single peptide marker for quantitation of total IgG by LC-MS/MS was assessed in a range of milk-based commodities. The LC-MS/MS method was compared to AOAC method 2010.01, based on affinity liquid chromatography, with and without the casein precipitation step. Heat stability of bovine IgG in a model nutritional product was evaluated.

Method: After dilution in buffer, reduction, alkylation, and tryptic digestion, a single IgG1 + 3 isoform-specific peptide was used for quantitation of total IgG. The corresponding isotopically labeled peptide was used for internal standardization. Colostrum powder was used as matrix-matched calibrant.

Results: Linearity was demonstrated in the 5-500 mg/L total IgG range. Within-day and intermediate precision were <4% and <6%, respectively, in two milk-based matrices and recovery was 95-99%. Major differences were noted between the LC-MS/MS method and AOAC method 2010.01 with and without casein precipitation, caused by factors such as loss of IgG during casein precipitation and inclusion of partially denatured IgG in the result. Heat processing loss of bovine IgG in a nutritional product was ca. 25% by the LC-MS/MS method.

Conclusions: The LC-MS/MS method is applicable to milk-based commodities and nutritional products as well. A higher fraction of IgG (including denatured IgG) is accessible to measurement by LC-MS/MS than by AOAC method 2010.01. Casein precipitation in whey-based matrices causes loss of IgG.

Highlights: A robust and widely applicable LC-MS/MS method using colostrum powder as calibrant and a single peptide marker for total IgG is being proposed.

乳基商品中牛免疫球蛋白G的分析:液相色谱-串联质谱法与亲和液相色谱法。
背景:目前牛免疫球蛋白G (IgG)的分析方法在选择性、重现性和对复杂基质的适用性方面存在一定的局限性。液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS/MS)使用基于肽的定量和合适的校准剂可以潜在地克服这些局限性。目的:评价商品牛IgG标准品和初乳粉作为标准品的适用性。在一系列乳基商品中评估了使用单肽标记物定量总IgG的可行性。采用亲和液相色谱法,比较了LC-MS/MS法与AOAC法(2010.01)的差异,分别添加和不添加酪蛋白沉淀步骤。研究了牛IgG在模型营养品中的热稳定性。方法:经缓冲液稀释、还原、烷基化、胰蛋白酶消化后,用单个IgG1 + 3亚型特异性肽定量总IgG。采用相应的同位素标记肽进行内标。初乳粉作为基质匹配校准剂。结果:总IgG在5 ~ 500 mg/L范围内呈线性关系。结论:LC-MS/MS方法同样适用于乳类商品和营养品。与AOAC法相比,LC-MS/MS法可测定的IgG(包括变性IgG)比例更高(2010.01)。酪蛋白沉淀在乳清基基质中导致IgG丢失。重点:提出了一种稳健且广泛适用的LC-MS/MS方法,使用初乳粉作为校准剂和单肽标记物来检测总IgG。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信