Exploring the Relationship Between Students' Emotions in Emotion-Based Activities, Creativity, and Psychological Well-Being.

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Aigui Wang, Ali Derakhshan
{"title":"Exploring the Relationship Between Students' Emotions in Emotion-Based Activities, Creativity, and Psychological Well-Being.","authors":"Aigui Wang, Ali Derakhshan","doi":"10.1177/00315125251385739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> University students' emotions, creativity, and psychological well-being are interrelated, yet the mechanisms linking emotion-driven activities to creative expression and mental health outcomes remain underexplored. <b>Purpose:</b> This study aimed to examine the interrelationships between students' emotions in emotion-based activities, creativity, and psychological well-being. <b>Research Design:</b> A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing validated self-report questionnaires and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for data analysis. Study Sample: The sample consisted of 952 university students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). <b>Data Collection and/or Analysis:</b> Data were collected via standardized questionnaires assessing emotional engagement, creativity, and psychological well-being. SEM was conducted using AMOS to evaluate the measurement and structural models, with reliability and validity indices reported. <b>Results:</b> Emotional engagement negatively predicted creativity (<i>β</i> = -0.584, <i>p</i> = .002), indicating that heightened involvement in emotion-based activities may constrain creative expression. Creativity positively predicted psychological well-being (<i>β</i> = 0.591, <i>p</i> = .001), and emotions exhibited a strong positive effect on well-being (<i>β</i> = 0.653, <i>p</i> = .001). The structural model explained 51% of the variance in psychological well-being (<i>R²</i> = .513, <i>p</i> < .001). The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory fit (<i>CFI</i> = 0.924, <i>RMSEA</i> = 0.067, <i>TLI</i> = 0.947), with all constructs showing strong reliability (<i>CR</i> ≥ 0.83) and validity (<i>AVE</i> ≥ 0.86). <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings underscore the complex interplay between affective experiences and creativity in shaping students' psychological well-being. Educational interventions should consider balancing emotional engagement with opportunities for creative expression to enhance mental health outcomes in academic contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251385739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251385739","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: University students' emotions, creativity, and psychological well-being are interrelated, yet the mechanisms linking emotion-driven activities to creative expression and mental health outcomes remain underexplored. Purpose: This study aimed to examine the interrelationships between students' emotions in emotion-based activities, creativity, and psychological well-being. Research Design: A quantitative, cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing validated self-report questionnaires and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for data analysis. Study Sample: The sample consisted of 952 university students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). Data Collection and/or Analysis: Data were collected via standardized questionnaires assessing emotional engagement, creativity, and psychological well-being. SEM was conducted using AMOS to evaluate the measurement and structural models, with reliability and validity indices reported. Results: Emotional engagement negatively predicted creativity (β = -0.584, p = .002), indicating that heightened involvement in emotion-based activities may constrain creative expression. Creativity positively predicted psychological well-being (β = 0.591, p = .001), and emotions exhibited a strong positive effect on well-being (β = 0.653, p = .001). The structural model explained 51% of the variance in psychological well-being ( = .513, p < .001). The measurement model demonstrated satisfactory fit (CFI = 0.924, RMSEA = 0.067, TLI = 0.947), with all constructs showing strong reliability (CR ≥ 0.83) and validity (AVE ≥ 0.86). Conclusions: The findings underscore the complex interplay between affective experiences and creativity in shaping students' psychological well-being. Educational interventions should consider balancing emotional engagement with opportunities for creative expression to enhance mental health outcomes in academic contexts.

探究学生情绪活动、创造力与心理健康的关系。
背景:大学生的情绪、创造力和心理健康是相互关联的,但情感驱动活动与创造性表达和心理健康结果之间的联系机制仍未得到充分探讨。目的:本研究旨在探讨学生情绪活动、创造力与心理健康之间的关系。研究设计:采用定量、横断面设计,利用有效的自我报告问卷和结构方程模型(SEM)进行数据分析。研究样本:样本由952名学习英语作为外语的大学生组成。数据收集和/或分析:通过评估情感投入、创造力和心理健康的标准化问卷收集数据。采用AMOS对测量模型和结构模型进行扫描电镜评价,并报告了信度和效度指标。结果:情绪投入负向预测创造力(β = -0.584, p = .002),表明情绪活动的高度参与可能会限制创造性表达。创造力正向预测心理健康(β = 0.591, p = .001),情绪正向预测心理健康(β = 0.653, p = .001)。结构模型解释了51%的心理健康方差(R²= .513,p < .001)。测量模型拟合满意(CFI = 0.924, RMSEA = 0.067, TLI = 0.947),各结构体具有较强的信度(CR≥0.83)和效度(AVE≥0.86)。结论:研究结果强调了情感体验和创造力在塑造学生心理健康方面的复杂相互作用。教育干预应考虑平衡情感参与与创造性表达的机会,以提高学术环境中的心理健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信