{"title":"Digitalisation and Firm-Level ESG Performance and Disclosures: A Scientometric Review and Research Agenda","authors":"Monica Singhania, Ibna Bhan, Surabhi Seth","doi":"10.1002/ijfe.3118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Digitalisation and sustainability are not just critical business notions; they are also interdependent drivers of future business success. By employing digital tools, firms can improve their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, increase transparency, and maintain stakeholders' accountability. This increasing significance has elevated the value of examining the impact of digitalisation on firm-level ESG performance and disclosures. This study explores this relationship by synthesising 199 relevant research records published during 2019–2024, obtained from Web of Science and Scopus, using a bibliometric and systematic literature review approach. Our descriptive analysis reveals exponential growth in publications on this relationship during the study period, focusing predominantly on quantitative research leveraging secondary data. Regression analysis emerged as the most popular analytical technique, followed by structural equation modelling. The theoretical foundations of this research are based on the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities view. The Co-occurrence analysis identifies China, Italy, and England as the leading contributors, with research hot spots centring around concepts such as ‘Industry 4.0’, ‘sustainability performance’, ‘sustainable development’, and ‘sustainability reporting’. Co-citation analysis highlights the leading journals, authors, and documents, emphasising the scholarly foundations of this field. Further, thematic analysis uncovers the benefits of digitalisation across four dominant dimensions: sustainability performance, supply chain sustainability, sustainability assessment, and sustainability accounting and reporting. Finally, we discuss critical knowledge gaps and propose future research questions to advance understanding of this emerging field.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47461,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","volume":"30 4","pages":"4212-4236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Finance & Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijfe.3118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Digitalisation and sustainability are not just critical business notions; they are also interdependent drivers of future business success. By employing digital tools, firms can improve their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance, increase transparency, and maintain stakeholders' accountability. This increasing significance has elevated the value of examining the impact of digitalisation on firm-level ESG performance and disclosures. This study explores this relationship by synthesising 199 relevant research records published during 2019–2024, obtained from Web of Science and Scopus, using a bibliometric and systematic literature review approach. Our descriptive analysis reveals exponential growth in publications on this relationship during the study period, focusing predominantly on quantitative research leveraging secondary data. Regression analysis emerged as the most popular analytical technique, followed by structural equation modelling. The theoretical foundations of this research are based on the resource-based view and dynamic capabilities view. The Co-occurrence analysis identifies China, Italy, and England as the leading contributors, with research hot spots centring around concepts such as ‘Industry 4.0’, ‘sustainability performance’, ‘sustainable development’, and ‘sustainability reporting’. Co-citation analysis highlights the leading journals, authors, and documents, emphasising the scholarly foundations of this field. Further, thematic analysis uncovers the benefits of digitalisation across four dominant dimensions: sustainability performance, supply chain sustainability, sustainability assessment, and sustainability accounting and reporting. Finally, we discuss critical knowledge gaps and propose future research questions to advance understanding of this emerging field.
数字化和可持续性不仅是关键的商业概念;他们也是未来商业成功的相互依赖的驱动力。通过使用数字工具,企业可以改善其环境、社会和治理(ESG)绩效,提高透明度,并保持利益相关者的问责制。这种日益重要的意义提升了研究数字化对公司层面ESG绩效和披露影响的价值。本研究采用文献计量学和系统文献综述的方法,综合了Web of Science和Scopus在2019-2024年间发表的199篇相关研究文献,探讨了这一关系。我们的描述性分析显示,在研究期间,关于这种关系的出版物呈指数增长,主要集中在利用二手数据的定量研究上。回归分析成为最流行的分析技术,其次是结构方程建模。本研究的理论基础是基于资源基础观和动态能力观。共现分析将中国、意大利和英国列为主要贡献者,研究热点集中在“工业4.0”、“可持续绩效”、“可持续发展”和“可持续报告”等概念上。共引分析突出了主要期刊、作者和文献,强调了该领域的学术基础。此外,专题分析揭示了数字化在四个主要方面的好处:可持续性绩效、供应链可持续性、可持续性评估以及可持续性会计和报告。最后,我们讨论了关键的知识差距,并提出了未来的研究问题,以促进对这一新兴领域的理解。