The impact of emotional face distractors on working memory performance: a meta-analysis of behavioural studies.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Chenxiao Wu, Chenyuan Zhang, Xueqiao Li, Piia Astikainen
{"title":"The impact of emotional face distractors on working memory performance: a meta-analysis of behavioural studies.","authors":"Chenxiao Wu, Chenyuan Zhang, Xueqiao Li, Piia Astikainen","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2568559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Task-irrelevant emotional faces may affect working memory (WM) performance by involuntarily capturing attention. However, existing research has not clarified the magnitude or significance of this impact, nor the moderating role of factors such as facial valence. To date, no meta-analysis has examined this topic. This meta-analysis synthesised data from 38 studies, encompassing a total of 1,713 participants, to systematically evaluate the impact of emotional face distractors on WM performance in healthy individuals. The literature search covered seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest. No significant publication bias was detected. The outcome of WM performance precision exhibited moderate heterogeneity, whereas that of reaction time showed no evidence of heterogeneity. Effect size analyses indicated that emotional face distractors, compared to non-emotional references, had no significant impact on WM performance precision or reaction time. Subgroup analyses further indicated that facial valence, emotional face type, non-emotional reference type, participant age, and WM task difficulty did not significantly moderate the two outcomes. The only exception was a very small yet significant negative impact of fearful face distractors on performance precision, although this effect was unstable. This study provides empirical evidence by synthesising findings from extensive research and offers methodological guidance for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2568559","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Task-irrelevant emotional faces may affect working memory (WM) performance by involuntarily capturing attention. However, existing research has not clarified the magnitude or significance of this impact, nor the moderating role of factors such as facial valence. To date, no meta-analysis has examined this topic. This meta-analysis synthesised data from 38 studies, encompassing a total of 1,713 participants, to systematically evaluate the impact of emotional face distractors on WM performance in healthy individuals. The literature search covered seven databases, including PubMed, Embase, and ProQuest. No significant publication bias was detected. The outcome of WM performance precision exhibited moderate heterogeneity, whereas that of reaction time showed no evidence of heterogeneity. Effect size analyses indicated that emotional face distractors, compared to non-emotional references, had no significant impact on WM performance precision or reaction time. Subgroup analyses further indicated that facial valence, emotional face type, non-emotional reference type, participant age, and WM task difficulty did not significantly moderate the two outcomes. The only exception was a very small yet significant negative impact of fearful face distractors on performance precision, although this effect was unstable. This study provides empirical evidence by synthesising findings from extensive research and offers methodological guidance for future research.

情绪性面孔干扰对工作记忆表现的影响:行为研究的元分析。
与任务无关的情绪面孔可能通过不自觉地吸引注意力而影响工作记忆(WM)的表现。然而,现有的研究并没有明确这种影响的程度或重要性,也没有明确面部效价等因素的调节作用。到目前为止,还没有荟萃分析研究过这个话题。这项荟萃分析综合了38项研究的数据,共涉及1713名参与者,系统地评估了情绪面部干扰对健康个体WM表现的影响。文献检索覆盖PubMed、Embase、ProQuest等7个数据库。未发现显著的发表偏倚。WM表现精度的结果表现出中度异质性,而反应时间的结果则没有异质性。效应量分析表明,与非情绪性参考资料相比,情绪性面孔干扰物对WM表现精度和反应时间没有显著影响。亚组分析进一步表明,面部效价、情绪面孔类型、非情绪参照类型、参与者年龄和WM任务难度对这两个结果没有显著的调节作用。唯一的例外是,恐惧面孔干扰对表现精度的负面影响非常小,但却很显著,尽管这种影响是不稳定的。本研究通过综合广泛研究的结果提供了经验证据,并为今后的研究提供了方法指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信