Cheng Shi, Gloria H Y Wong, Jacky C P Choy, Jennifer Y M Tang, Hao Luo, Shiyu Lu, Adelina Comas Herrera, Martin Knapp, Terry Y S Lum
{"title":"Association of dementia diagnosis, cognitive impairment levels, and their combination with care costs among publicly funded long-term care recipients.","authors":"Cheng Shi, Gloria H Y Wong, Jacky C P Choy, Jennifer Y M Tang, Hao Luo, Shiyu Lu, Adelina Comas Herrera, Martin Knapp, Terry Y S Lum","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most people with dementia are undiagnosed and rely heavily on long-term care. Little is known about the relationship between dementia diagnosis and care costs, and inconsistent evidence exists on the cost implications of cognitive impairment severity. We examined how formal and informal care costs are associated with a dementia diagnosis and cognitive impairment levels across care settings.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used representative data from publicly funded long-term care recipients in residential care settings and community care settings in Hong Kong (<i>n</i> = 1,603). Staff time measurement was used to capture service utilization of both formal and informal care. Generalized linear model (log-link and gamma distribution) was used to estimate long-term care costs, controlling for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A dementia diagnosis is associated with an additional 13% and 23% care costs in residential and community care settings, respectively. People with more severe cognitive impairment incur greater long-term care costs; the highest difference (a 189% increase) was found in informal care costs in community care settings among those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. In community care settings, formal care costs were insensitive to cognition status but were consistently higher with a dementia diagnosis; in contrast, informal care costs were less associated with a diagnosis but increased with cognitive impairment severity.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Having a diagnosis of dementia and poorer cognition are associated with higher long-term care costs in both residential and community care settings. A dementia diagnosis is potentially a more important driver of formal care costs than cognitive impairment levels within the current care system, in contrast to what is observed with informal care costs. Practitioners and policymakers need to ensure that individuals with cognitive impairment without a dementia diagnosis receive the appropriate level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 9","pages":"igaf088"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objectives: Most people with dementia are undiagnosed and rely heavily on long-term care. Little is known about the relationship between dementia diagnosis and care costs, and inconsistent evidence exists on the cost implications of cognitive impairment severity. We examined how formal and informal care costs are associated with a dementia diagnosis and cognitive impairment levels across care settings.
Research design and methods: We used representative data from publicly funded long-term care recipients in residential care settings and community care settings in Hong Kong (n = 1,603). Staff time measurement was used to capture service utilization of both formal and informal care. Generalized linear model (log-link and gamma distribution) was used to estimate long-term care costs, controlling for covariates.
Results: A dementia diagnosis is associated with an additional 13% and 23% care costs in residential and community care settings, respectively. People with more severe cognitive impairment incur greater long-term care costs; the highest difference (a 189% increase) was found in informal care costs in community care settings among those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. In community care settings, formal care costs were insensitive to cognition status but were consistently higher with a dementia diagnosis; in contrast, informal care costs were less associated with a diagnosis but increased with cognitive impairment severity.
Discussion and implications: Having a diagnosis of dementia and poorer cognition are associated with higher long-term care costs in both residential and community care settings. A dementia diagnosis is potentially a more important driver of formal care costs than cognitive impairment levels within the current care system, in contrast to what is observed with informal care costs. Practitioners and policymakers need to ensure that individuals with cognitive impairment without a dementia diagnosis receive the appropriate level of care.
期刊介绍:
Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.