Association of dementia diagnosis, cognitive impairment levels, and their combination with care costs among publicly funded long-term care recipients.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-08-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf088
Cheng Shi, Gloria H Y Wong, Jacky C P Choy, Jennifer Y M Tang, Hao Luo, Shiyu Lu, Adelina Comas Herrera, Martin Knapp, Terry Y S Lum
{"title":"Association of dementia diagnosis, cognitive impairment levels, and their combination with care costs among publicly funded long-term care recipients.","authors":"Cheng Shi, Gloria H Y Wong, Jacky C P Choy, Jennifer Y M Tang, Hao Luo, Shiyu Lu, Adelina Comas Herrera, Martin Knapp, Terry Y S Lum","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Most people with dementia are undiagnosed and rely heavily on long-term care. Little is known about the relationship between dementia diagnosis and care costs, and inconsistent evidence exists on the cost implications of cognitive impairment severity. We examined how formal and informal care costs are associated with a dementia diagnosis and cognitive impairment levels across care settings.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We used representative data from publicly funded long-term care recipients in residential care settings and community care settings in Hong Kong (<i>n</i> = 1,603). Staff time measurement was used to capture service utilization of both formal and informal care. Generalized linear model (log-link and gamma distribution) was used to estimate long-term care costs, controlling for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A dementia diagnosis is associated with an additional 13% and 23% care costs in residential and community care settings, respectively. People with more severe cognitive impairment incur greater long-term care costs; the highest difference (a 189% increase) was found in informal care costs in community care settings among those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. In community care settings, formal care costs were insensitive to cognition status but were consistently higher with a dementia diagnosis; in contrast, informal care costs were less associated with a diagnosis but increased with cognitive impairment severity.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>Having a diagnosis of dementia and poorer cognition are associated with higher long-term care costs in both residential and community care settings. A dementia diagnosis is potentially a more important driver of formal care costs than cognitive impairment levels within the current care system, in contrast to what is observed with informal care costs. Practitioners and policymakers need to ensure that individuals with cognitive impairment without a dementia diagnosis receive the appropriate level of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 9","pages":"igaf088"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12499915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Most people with dementia are undiagnosed and rely heavily on long-term care. Little is known about the relationship between dementia diagnosis and care costs, and inconsistent evidence exists on the cost implications of cognitive impairment severity. We examined how formal and informal care costs are associated with a dementia diagnosis and cognitive impairment levels across care settings.

Research design and methods: We used representative data from publicly funded long-term care recipients in residential care settings and community care settings in Hong Kong (n = 1,603). Staff time measurement was used to capture service utilization of both formal and informal care. Generalized linear model (log-link and gamma distribution) was used to estimate long-term care costs, controlling for covariates.

Results: A dementia diagnosis is associated with an additional 13% and 23% care costs in residential and community care settings, respectively. People with more severe cognitive impairment incur greater long-term care costs; the highest difference (a 189% increase) was found in informal care costs in community care settings among those with moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment. In community care settings, formal care costs were insensitive to cognition status but were consistently higher with a dementia diagnosis; in contrast, informal care costs were less associated with a diagnosis but increased with cognitive impairment severity.

Discussion and implications: Having a diagnosis of dementia and poorer cognition are associated with higher long-term care costs in both residential and community care settings. A dementia diagnosis is potentially a more important driver of formal care costs than cognitive impairment levels within the current care system, in contrast to what is observed with informal care costs. Practitioners and policymakers need to ensure that individuals with cognitive impairment without a dementia diagnosis receive the appropriate level of care.

在公共资助的长期护理接受者中,痴呆诊断、认知障碍水平及其与护理费用的关联。
背景和目的:大多数痴呆症患者未被确诊,严重依赖长期护理。人们对痴呆症诊断和护理费用之间的关系知之甚少,而且关于认知障碍严重程度的成本影响存在不一致的证据。我们研究了正规和非正规护理费用与痴呆症诊断和认知障碍水平之间的关系。研究设计和方法:我们使用了来自香港公立长期护理机构和社区护理机构的代表性数据(n = 1,603)。工作人员时间测量被用来捕捉正式和非正式护理的服务利用情况。在控制协变量的情况下,使用广义线性模型(log-link和gamma分布)来估计长期护理成本。结果:在住宅和社区护理机构中,痴呆诊断分别与额外的13%和23%的护理费用相关。认知障碍更严重的人需要更多的长期护理费用;在中度至重度认知障碍患者中,社区护理环境中的非正式护理费用差异最大(增加189%)。在社区护理环境中,正式护理费用对认知状态不敏感,但与痴呆诊断一致较高;相比之下,非正式护理费用与诊断的关系较小,但随着认知障碍的严重程度而增加。讨论和启示:在住宅和社区护理机构中,诊断为痴呆和认知能力较差与较高的长期护理费用相关。与观察到的非正式护理费用相比,痴呆症诊断可能是当前护理系统中认知障碍水平更重要的正式护理费用驱动因素。从业人员和政策制定者需要确保没有痴呆症诊断的认知障碍患者得到适当水平的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信