Michael Rush, J. David Ricker, Pramod Prasad Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Cary Watterson, Dmitriy Pastarnak
{"title":"Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization","authors":"Michael Rush, J. David Ricker, Pramod Prasad Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Cary Watterson, Dmitriy Pastarnak","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.
期刊介绍:
Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.