Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization

IF 6.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Michael Rush, J. David Ricker, Pramod Prasad Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Cary Watterson, Dmitriy Pastarnak
{"title":"Challenging the Database: Day-of-Analysis Calibration and UF Modeling for Reliable RRF Use in Medical Device Chemical Characterization","authors":"Michael Rush, J. David Ricker, Pramod Prasad Poudel, Nuwan Kothalawala, Cary Watterson, Dmitriy Pastarnak","doi":"10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.","PeriodicalId":27,"journal":{"name":"Analytical Chemistry","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c04247","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate quantitation during chemical characterization─also referred to as extractables and leachables (E&L)─within a toxicological risk assessment for medical device biocompatibility hinges on the appropriate application of relative response factors (RRFs). This study investigates the variability of RRFs across a chemically diverse set of compounds and evaluates the implications of quantitation model selection on analytical outcomes. Using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS), we demonstrate that RRFs are highly context-dependent and influenced by factors such as ionization mode, compound class, concentration, and instrument conditions. We propose an approach to RRF determination, emphasizing day-of-analysis calibration and uncertainty factor modeling to improve reproducibility. Our findings support a statistically grounded application of analytical evaluation thresholds, enhancing the reliability of semiquantitative assessments in medical device biocompatibility.

Abstract Image

挑战数据库:在医疗器械化学表征中可靠的RRF使用的分析日校准和UF建模
在医疗器械生物相容性毒理学风险评估中,化学表征期间的准确定量──也称为可提取物和可浸出物(E&;L)──取决于相对反应因子(RRFs)的适当应用。本研究调查了化学多样性化合物中rfs的可变性,并评估了定量模型选择对分析结果的影响。利用气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)和液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS),我们证明了RRFs高度依赖于环境,并受到电离模式、化合物类别、浓度和仪器条件等因素的影响。我们提出了一种确定RRF的方法,强调分析日校准和不确定因素建模以提高再现性。我们的研究结果支持基于统计的分析评价阈值的应用,增强了医疗器械生物相容性半定量评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Analytical Chemistry
Analytical Chemistry 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
12.20%
发文量
1949
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Analytical Chemistry, a peer-reviewed research journal, focuses on disseminating new and original knowledge across all branches of analytical chemistry. Fundamental articles may explore general principles of chemical measurement science and need not directly address existing or potential analytical methodology. They can be entirely theoretical or report experimental results. Contributions may cover various phases of analytical operations, including sampling, bioanalysis, electrochemistry, mass spectrometry, microscale and nanoscale systems, environmental analysis, separations, spectroscopy, chemical reactions and selectivity, instrumentation, imaging, surface analysis, and data processing. Papers discussing known analytical methods should present a significant, original application of the method, a notable improvement, or results on an important analyte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信