Anticipated effect valence retrieves matching past responses but does not modulate stimulus-response binding.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Viola Mocke, Wilfried Kunde, Klaus Rothermund
{"title":"Anticipated effect valence retrieves matching past responses but does not modulate stimulus-response binding.","authors":"Viola Mocke, Wilfried Kunde, Klaus Rothermund","doi":"10.1080/02699931.2025.2566308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In two preregistered experiments (total <i>n</i> = 180), we investigated how the valence of experienced and anticipated action effects influences episodic binding and retrieval effects. Participants responded to the colour of words, and responses were followed by a positive or negative audio-visual effect that was already announced by a cue at the beginning of each trial. Dissecting all trials into prime-probe dyads revealed that the anticipated effect valence in the probe retrieved prime responses that had previously produced an effect of the same valence. Not only the bottom-up perception of the valence cue, but also the anticipation of an effect valence contributed to this retrieval. A repetition of the word identity (distractor) also led to retrieval of the prime response (but not of the effect valence). Distractor-response retrieval effects, however, were (a) not enhanced when having experienced a positive effect after a previous prime response, (b) not enhanced when anticipating a positive probe effect, and (c) not consistently enhanced when anticipating an effect matching the one of the to-be retrieved response, indicating that binding and retrieval operate independently of affective consequences. Our findings align with the idea of binary bindings between distractors and responses, as well as between responses and effect valences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48412,"journal":{"name":"Cognition & Emotion","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognition & Emotion","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2025.2566308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In two preregistered experiments (total n = 180), we investigated how the valence of experienced and anticipated action effects influences episodic binding and retrieval effects. Participants responded to the colour of words, and responses were followed by a positive or negative audio-visual effect that was already announced by a cue at the beginning of each trial. Dissecting all trials into prime-probe dyads revealed that the anticipated effect valence in the probe retrieved prime responses that had previously produced an effect of the same valence. Not only the bottom-up perception of the valence cue, but also the anticipation of an effect valence contributed to this retrieval. A repetition of the word identity (distractor) also led to retrieval of the prime response (but not of the effect valence). Distractor-response retrieval effects, however, were (a) not enhanced when having experienced a positive effect after a previous prime response, (b) not enhanced when anticipating a positive probe effect, and (c) not consistently enhanced when anticipating an effect matching the one of the to-be retrieved response, indicating that binding and retrieval operate independently of affective consequences. Our findings align with the idea of binary bindings between distractors and responses, as well as between responses and effect valences.

预期效价检索匹配过去的反应,但不调节刺激-反应结合。
在两个预注册实验中(共180例),我们研究了经验和预期动作效应的效价如何影响情景结合效应和检索效应。参与者对单词的颜色做出反应,反应之后是积极或消极的视听效果,这些效果在每次试验开始时就已经通过提示宣布了。将所有试验分解为启动-探针二组,揭示了探针的预期效应价恢复了先前产生相同价的启动反应。除了自下而上对效价线索的感知外,对效价的预期也有助于这种检索。重复“身份”一词(干扰物)也会导致启动反应的提取(但不会导致效价的提取)。然而,分心反应检索效应(a)在经历了前一个启动反应后的积极效应时没有增强,(b)在预期一个积极的探针效应时没有增强,(c)在预期与将要检索的反应相匹配的效应时没有持续增强,这表明绑定和检索独立于情感后果。我们的发现与干扰物和反应之间以及反应和效应价之间的二元绑定的想法一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognition & Emotion
Cognition & Emotion PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: Cognition & Emotion is devoted to the study of emotion, especially to those aspects of emotion related to cognitive processes. The journal aims to bring together work on emotion undertaken by researchers in cognitive, social, clinical, and developmental psychology, neuropsychology, and cognitive science. Examples of topics appropriate for the journal include the role of cognitive processes in emotion elicitation, regulation, and expression; the impact of emotion on attention, memory, learning, motivation, judgements, and decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信