Does neonatal care delivery in England and Wales vary by deprivation and ethnicity: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Katherine Pettinger, Saira Pons Perez, Humfrey Legge, Shalini Ojha, David Odd, Sam Oddie
{"title":"Does neonatal care delivery in England and Wales vary by deprivation and ethnicity: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Katherine Pettinger, Saira Pons Perez, Humfrey Legge, Shalini Ojha, David Odd, Sam Oddie","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether perinatal care delivery in England and Wales varies by ethnicity and socio-economic deprivation, using National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) measures.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study using NNAP (2017-2023) data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Neonatal units in England and Wales participating in the NNAP.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Admitted infants born at ≥22 weeks with recorded data on ethnicity, deprivation and relevant NNAP measures.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Fourteen NNAP measures covering perinatal optimisation, neonatal care, breastfeeding and parental partnership were explored by ethnicity (White, Black, Asian, Mixed and Other) and deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ethnicity and deprivation were associated with several measures of care. Compared with White infants, Black, Asian, Mixed and 'Other' ethnicity babies had lower odds of receiving deferred cord clamping (adjusted ORs (aOR) 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.84), 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), 0.79 (0.68 to 0.92) and 0.75 (0.64 to 0.88), respectively) and had higher odds of abnormal admission temperature. White infants had higher odds of receiving early breastmilk compared with infants from minority ethnic groups, but had lower odds of receiving it at 14 days or at discharge. Compared with the least deprived, the most deprived infants had lower odds of receiving breastmilk, within 48 hours (aOR: 0.58 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.63)) and at discharge (aOR: 0.39 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.43)). There were lower odds of early parental updates and involvement in ward rounds for minoritised ethnic groups (compared with White families) and most deprived (compared with least deprived) families.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disparities exist in the delivery of perinatal care by ethnicity and deprivation. There are opportunities to improve equity, particularly around deferred cord clamping, breastfeeding support and parental partnership.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12506196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-003585","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether perinatal care delivery in England and Wales varies by ethnicity and socio-economic deprivation, using National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP) measures.

Design: Retrospective observational study using NNAP (2017-2023) data.

Setting: Neonatal units in England and Wales participating in the NNAP.

Participants: Admitted infants born at ≥22 weeks with recorded data on ethnicity, deprivation and relevant NNAP measures.

Outcome measures: Fourteen NNAP measures covering perinatal optimisation, neonatal care, breastfeeding and parental partnership were explored by ethnicity (White, Black, Asian, Mixed and Other) and deprivation.

Results: Ethnicity and deprivation were associated with several measures of care. Compared with White infants, Black, Asian, Mixed and 'Other' ethnicity babies had lower odds of receiving deferred cord clamping (adjusted ORs (aOR) 0.76 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.84), 0.88 (95% CI 0.82 to 0.95), 0.79 (0.68 to 0.92) and 0.75 (0.64 to 0.88), respectively) and had higher odds of abnormal admission temperature. White infants had higher odds of receiving early breastmilk compared with infants from minority ethnic groups, but had lower odds of receiving it at 14 days or at discharge. Compared with the least deprived, the most deprived infants had lower odds of receiving breastmilk, within 48 hours (aOR: 0.58 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.63)) and at discharge (aOR: 0.39 (95% CI 0.36 to 0.43)). There were lower odds of early parental updates and involvement in ward rounds for minoritised ethnic groups (compared with White families) and most deprived (compared with least deprived) families.

Conclusions: Disparities exist in the delivery of perinatal care by ethnicity and deprivation. There are opportunities to improve equity, particularly around deferred cord clamping, breastfeeding support and parental partnership.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

英格兰和威尔士的新生儿护理是否因贫困和种族而异:一项回顾性队列研究?
目的:利用国家新生儿审计计划(NNAP)措施,调查英格兰和威尔士围产期护理服务是否因种族和社会经济剥夺而有所不同。设计:回顾性观察研究,使用NNAP(2017-2023)数据。背景:参与NNAP的英格兰和威尔士新生儿病房。参与者:出生≥22周的住院婴儿,记录种族、剥夺和相关NNAP措施的数据。结果测量:14项NNAP措施涵盖围产期优化、新生儿护理、母乳喂养和父母伴侣关系,按种族(白人、黑人、亚洲人、混血儿和其他)和剥夺进行了探索。结果:种族和剥夺与一些护理措施有关。与白人婴儿相比,黑人、亚洲人、混血儿和“其他”种族婴儿接受延迟脐带夹紧的几率较低(调整后的or (aOR)分别为0.76 (95% CI 0.70至0.84)、0.88 (95% CI 0.82至0.95)、0.79(0.68至0.92)和0.75(0.64至0.88)),而入院温度异常的几率较高。与少数民族婴儿相比,白人婴儿接受早期母乳喂养的几率更高,但在14天或出院时接受母乳喂养的几率较低。与最贫困的婴儿相比,最贫困的婴儿在48小时内(aOR: 0.58 (95% CI 0.54至0.63))和出院时(aOR: 0.39 (95% CI 0.36至0.43))获得母乳的几率较低。少数族裔家庭(与白人家庭相比)和最贫困家庭(与最贫困家庭相比)的早期父母更新和参与查房的几率较低。结论:围产期护理存在种族和贫困差异。有机会改善公平性,特别是在推迟脐带夹紧、母乳喂养支持和父母伙伴关系方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信