Exploring Australian parent preferences for a school-provided meal offering using a discrete choice experiment.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Alexandra C Manson, Rebecca K Golley, Vicki Brown, Daniela McCann, Brittany J Johnson
{"title":"Exploring Australian parent preferences for a school-provided meal offering using a discrete choice experiment.","authors":"Alexandra C Manson, Rebecca K Golley, Vicki Brown, Daniela McCann, Brittany J Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.appet.2025.108335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is growing interest in school-provided meal offerings in Australia. As a key stakeholder, it is important to understand Australian parent/caregiver preferences for such an offering. This study aimed to investigate parent interest and preferences in a school-provided meal offering for Australian primary schools. An online survey incorporating a discrete choice experiment was administered to parents of primary school-aged children across Australia. The discrete choice experiment involved 12 choice tasks, where parents were required to choose between two hypothetical school-provided lunch offerings. Six attributes with varying levels were used to describe the choice options: cost, nutrition and quality, environmental sustainability, access, menu options, and the school approach to food. A d-efficient design was constructed, with data analysed using multinomial logit models and the Krinsky and Robb method to calculate willingness to pay. The final sample consisted of 383 participants, predominantly women (90%). A majority expressed interest in school-provided meals (93%). The most significant influence on parent choice was nutrition and quality (β=0.71), followed by menu options (β=0.47), environmental sustainability (β=0.35), and a whole-school approach to food (β=0.28). A negative cost coefficient indicated a preference for lower-cost options. Parents were willing to pay for enhancements indicating the attributes were financially valued by parents. Results demonstrate Australian parent support for comprehensively designed and delivered school-provided lunches, aligned with their preferences. Parental preferences should be considered in system design, alongside other stakeholder perspectives, to achieve an acceptable and financially equitable school-provided meal system in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":242,"journal":{"name":"Appetite","volume":" ","pages":"108335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Appetite","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2025.108335","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing interest in school-provided meal offerings in Australia. As a key stakeholder, it is important to understand Australian parent/caregiver preferences for such an offering. This study aimed to investigate parent interest and preferences in a school-provided meal offering for Australian primary schools. An online survey incorporating a discrete choice experiment was administered to parents of primary school-aged children across Australia. The discrete choice experiment involved 12 choice tasks, where parents were required to choose between two hypothetical school-provided lunch offerings. Six attributes with varying levels were used to describe the choice options: cost, nutrition and quality, environmental sustainability, access, menu options, and the school approach to food. A d-efficient design was constructed, with data analysed using multinomial logit models and the Krinsky and Robb method to calculate willingness to pay. The final sample consisted of 383 participants, predominantly women (90%). A majority expressed interest in school-provided meals (93%). The most significant influence on parent choice was nutrition and quality (β=0.71), followed by menu options (β=0.47), environmental sustainability (β=0.35), and a whole-school approach to food (β=0.28). A negative cost coefficient indicated a preference for lower-cost options. Parents were willing to pay for enhancements indicating the attributes were financially valued by parents. Results demonstrate Australian parent support for comprehensively designed and delivered school-provided lunches, aligned with their preferences. Parental preferences should be considered in system design, alongside other stakeholder perspectives, to achieve an acceptable and financially equitable school-provided meal system in Australia.

使用离散选择实验探索澳大利亚家长对学校提供的膳食的偏好。
在澳大利亚,人们对学校提供的伙食越来越感兴趣。作为一个关键的利益相关者,了解澳大利亚父母/照顾者对这种产品的偏好是很重要的。本研究旨在调查家长对澳大利亚小学学校提供的膳食的兴趣和偏好。一项包含离散选择实验的在线调查对澳大利亚各地的小学学龄儿童的父母进行了调查。离散选择实验包括12项选择任务,要求家长在两种假想的学校提供的午餐中做出选择。六个不同层次的属性被用来描述选择选项:成本、营养和质量、环境可持续性、获取途径、菜单选项和学校对食物的态度。构建了d-efficient设计,并使用多项logit模型和Krinsky和Robb方法对数据进行分析,以计算支付意愿。最终的样本包括383名参与者,主要是女性(90%)。大多数学生表示对学校提供的膳食感兴趣(93%)。影响家长选择的最显著因素是营养和质量(β=0.71),其次是菜单选择(β=0.47)、环境可持续性(β=0.35)和全校用餐方式(β=0.28)。负成本系数表示更倾向于低成本的选择。父母愿意为增强功能付费,这表明父母在经济上重视这些属性。结果表明,澳大利亚家长支持根据他们的喜好,全面设计和提供学校提供的午餐。在系统设计中应考虑家长的偏好,以及其他利益相关者的观点,以实现澳大利亚可接受和财政公平的学校供餐系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Appetite
Appetite 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
566
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Appetite is an international research journal specializing in cultural, social, psychological, sensory and physiological influences on the selection and intake of foods and drinks. It covers normal and disordered eating and drinking and welcomes studies of both human and non-human animal behaviour toward food. Appetite publishes research reports, reviews and commentaries. Thematic special issues appear regularly. From time to time the journal carries abstracts from professional meetings. Submissions to Appetite are expected to be based primarily on observations directly related to the selection and intake of foods and drinks; papers that are primarily focused on topics such as nutrition or obesity will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution to the understanding of appetite in line with the journal's aims and scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信