Malin Grant , Désirée S. Jansson , Arianna Comin , Magdalena Jacobson , Maria Nöremark
{"title":"Strengths, challenges, and variations - insights into biosecurity practices in Swedish poultry production following HPAI outbreaks","authors":"Malin Grant , Désirée S. Jansson , Arianna Comin , Magdalena Jacobson , Maria Nöremark","doi":"10.1016/j.psj.2025.105871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated quantitatively and qualitatively the implementation of biosecurity in commercial poultry production in Sweden during 2020 and 2021 when outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) occurred. The study included case and non-case farms located in areas subjected to HPAI restriction zones with broiler parent breeders, layer pullets, laying hens, broilers, and meat turkeys with at least 2,000 birds. General biosecurity routines were investigated focusing on the wild bird-poultry interface. Data collection was based on face-to-face interviews and on-farm observations on 15 farms with HPAI outbreaks and 33 matched non-case farms using a questionnaire and the biosecurity scoring tool Biocheck.UGent (<span><span>https://biocheckgent.com</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>) to assess general biosecurity practices. Data were analyzed to identify differences related to poultry categories, geographical region, farm size and HPAI disease status. Additionally, qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis to explore barriers to biosecurity implementation.</div><div>The findings indicated that while biosecurity levels were generally high, there was significant variation among farms with category-specific strengths and challenges. Common weaknesses observed included inadequate infrastructure such as anteroom layout, limited training of farmworkers, suboptimal hand hygiene, and difficulties in maintaining good hygiene during the storage and introduction of roughage, such as hay and straw, into barns. Moreover, farmyards often lacked designated clean and dirty areas.</div><div>The qualitative analysis identified several factors affecting the implementation of biosecurity, and key qualitative themes were conflicting priorities, compliance based on perceived risk, and feelings of powerlessness. A need for specific knowledge on effective biosecurity measures against HPAI was expressed as well as lack of knowledge among farmworkers. The farm infrastructure could both facilitate and hamper effective biosecurity depending on its design. A risk-based approach meant adapting biosecurity based on the perceived risk of outbreaks and risk connected to different introduction routes. The conflicts of interest raised were often in relation to animal welfare and environmental considerations.</div><div>The main conclusions were that there is high heterogeneity in biosecurity among Swedish poultry farms, with implementation affected by multiple factors.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20459,"journal":{"name":"Poultry Science","volume":"104 12","pages":"Article 105871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Poultry Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579125011125","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study investigated quantitatively and qualitatively the implementation of biosecurity in commercial poultry production in Sweden during 2020 and 2021 when outbreaks of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) occurred. The study included case and non-case farms located in areas subjected to HPAI restriction zones with broiler parent breeders, layer pullets, laying hens, broilers, and meat turkeys with at least 2,000 birds. General biosecurity routines were investigated focusing on the wild bird-poultry interface. Data collection was based on face-to-face interviews and on-farm observations on 15 farms with HPAI outbreaks and 33 matched non-case farms using a questionnaire and the biosecurity scoring tool Biocheck.UGent (https://biocheckgent.com) to assess general biosecurity practices. Data were analyzed to identify differences related to poultry categories, geographical region, farm size and HPAI disease status. Additionally, qualitative data were examined using thematic analysis to explore barriers to biosecurity implementation.
The findings indicated that while biosecurity levels were generally high, there was significant variation among farms with category-specific strengths and challenges. Common weaknesses observed included inadequate infrastructure such as anteroom layout, limited training of farmworkers, suboptimal hand hygiene, and difficulties in maintaining good hygiene during the storage and introduction of roughage, such as hay and straw, into barns. Moreover, farmyards often lacked designated clean and dirty areas.
The qualitative analysis identified several factors affecting the implementation of biosecurity, and key qualitative themes were conflicting priorities, compliance based on perceived risk, and feelings of powerlessness. A need for specific knowledge on effective biosecurity measures against HPAI was expressed as well as lack of knowledge among farmworkers. The farm infrastructure could both facilitate and hamper effective biosecurity depending on its design. A risk-based approach meant adapting biosecurity based on the perceived risk of outbreaks and risk connected to different introduction routes. The conflicts of interest raised were often in relation to animal welfare and environmental considerations.
The main conclusions were that there is high heterogeneity in biosecurity among Swedish poultry farms, with implementation affected by multiple factors.
期刊介绍:
First self-published in 1921, Poultry Science is an internationally renowned monthly journal, known as the authoritative source for a broad range of poultry information and high-caliber research. The journal plays a pivotal role in the dissemination of preeminent poultry-related knowledge across all disciplines. As of January 2020, Poultry Science will become an Open Access journal with no subscription charges, meaning authors who publish here can make their research immediately, permanently, and freely accessible worldwide while retaining copyright to their work. Papers submitted for publication after October 1, 2019 will be published as Open Access papers.
An international journal, Poultry Science publishes original papers, research notes, symposium papers, and reviews of basic science as applied to poultry. This authoritative source of poultry information is consistently ranked by ISI Impact Factor as one of the top 10 agriculture, dairy and animal science journals to deliver high-caliber research. Currently it is the highest-ranked (by Impact Factor and Eigenfactor) journal dedicated to publishing poultry research. Subject areas include breeding, genetics, education, production, management, environment, health, behavior, welfare, immunology, molecular biology, metabolism, nutrition, physiology, reproduction, processing, and products.