A Systematic Review of Management of Cramping Pain in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hannah Katherine Hall, Elizabeth Austin, Karen Hutchinson, Colleen Cheek, Robyn Clay-Williams
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Management of Cramping Pain in Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis.","authors":"Hannah Katherine Hall, Elizabeth Austin, Karen Hutchinson, Colleen Cheek, Robyn Clay-Williams","doi":"10.1159/000548820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/introduction: </strong>Pain, particularly cramping, in people living with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is often underrecognized and under-treated. Despite affecting over 70% of people living with ALS (plwALS), cramping pain remains inadequately managed due to its complex nature and the difficulties plwALS face in communicating their symptoms as the disease progresses. This systematic review explores both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for cramping pain in ALS, aiming to assess and compare their efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42024521649). A comprehensive search was performed across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception until February 1, 2024, using specific search terms related to ALS and cramping.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search resulted in the identification of 368 studies. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, nine studies were included. Pharmacological interventions such as Mexiletine demonstrated significant reductions in cramp frequency and intensity in several trials, with varying doses showing distinct levels of effectiveness. Other medications like Dronabinol and Levetiracetam were also tested but showed limited efficacy in reducing cramp severity. Among non-pharmacological options, supervised exercise programs, particularly those incorporating stretching and functional mobility, were effective in reducing cramping pain intensity, while unsupervised home exercise programs did not show significant improvements.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The review demonstrates the scarcity of high-quality research on cramping pain management in ALS. Mexiletine emerged as the most promising pharmacological intervention, providing notable relief, while supervised exercise therapy demonstrated beneficial effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12065,"journal":{"name":"European Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548820","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/introduction: Pain, particularly cramping, in people living with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is often underrecognized and under-treated. Despite affecting over 70% of people living with ALS (plwALS), cramping pain remains inadequately managed due to its complex nature and the difficulties plwALS face in communicating their symptoms as the disease progresses. This systematic review explores both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments for cramping pain in ALS, aiming to assess and compare their efficacy.

Methods: The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID CRD42024521649). A comprehensive search was performed across MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane databases from inception until February 1, 2024, using specific search terms related to ALS and cramping.

Results: The search resulted in the identification of 368 studies. After duplicates were removed, abstracts screened, and full texts reviewed, nine studies were included. Pharmacological interventions such as Mexiletine demonstrated significant reductions in cramp frequency and intensity in several trials, with varying doses showing distinct levels of effectiveness. Other medications like Dronabinol and Levetiracetam were also tested but showed limited efficacy in reducing cramp severity. Among non-pharmacological options, supervised exercise programs, particularly those incorporating stretching and functional mobility, were effective in reducing cramping pain intensity, while unsupervised home exercise programs did not show significant improvements.

Conclusion: The review demonstrates the scarcity of high-quality research on cramping pain management in ALS. Mexiletine emerged as the most promising pharmacological intervention, providing notable relief, while supervised exercise therapy demonstrated beneficial effects.

肌萎缩性侧索硬化症患者痉挛痛治疗的系统综述。
背景/介绍:肌萎缩性侧索硬化症(ALS)患者的疼痛,尤其是痉挛,通常未被充分认识和治疗。尽管有超过70%的ALS患者受到影响,但由于其复杂性以及随着疾病进展,plwALS在传达其症状时面临的困难,痉挛痛仍未得到充分控制。本系统综述探讨了肌萎缩侧索硬化症痉挛痛的药物和非药物治疗方法,旨在评估和比较其疗效。方法:系统评价按照PRISMA指南进行,方案在PROSPERO注册(ID CRD42024521649)。在MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus和Cochrane数据库中进行了全面的搜索,从建立到2024年2月1日,使用与ALS和痉挛相关的特定搜索词。结果:检索结果确定了368项研究。在删除重复、筛选摘要和审查全文后,纳入了9项研究。在一些试验中,美西汀等药物干预显示出痉挛频率和强度的显著降低,不同剂量显示出不同程度的有效性。其他药物如屈大麻酚(Dronabinol)和左乙拉西坦(Levetiracetam)也进行了测试,但在减轻痉挛严重程度方面效果有限。在非药物的选择中,有监督的运动项目,特别是那些结合伸展和功能活动的项目,在减轻抽筋疼痛强度方面是有效的,而无监督的家庭运动项目并没有显示出显著的改善。结论:本文综述表明,缺乏高质量的ALS患者痉挛痛治疗研究。美西汀成为最有希望的药物干预,提供显著的缓解,而监督运动疗法显示出有益的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Neurology
European Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''European Neurology'' publishes original papers, reviews and letters to the editor. Papers presented in this journal cover clinical aspects of diseases of the nervous system and muscles, as well as their neuropathological, biochemical, and electrophysiological basis. New diagnostic probes, pharmacological and surgical treatments are evaluated from clinical evidence and basic investigative studies. The journal also features original works and reviews on the history of neurology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信