Optimization of single- and dual-cycle high pressure processing (HPP) to process bovine milk for microbial safety and protein quality.

IF 4.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Rudy Sykora, Bishal Barman, Hussein M H Mohamed, Austin Lowder, Bruna Pavani, Josiah Pagel, Andria Slaughter, Samuel Mosier, Daniela Barile, Joy Waite-Cusic, David C Dallas
{"title":"Optimization of single- and dual-cycle high pressure processing (HPP) to process bovine milk for microbial safety and protein quality.","authors":"Rudy Sykora, Bishal Barman, Hussein M H Mohamed, Austin Lowder, Bruna Pavani, Josiah Pagel, Andria Slaughter, Samuel Mosier, Daniela Barile, Joy Waite-Cusic, David C Dallas","doi":"10.3168/jds.2025-27003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bovine milk is a nutritionally rich fluid containing bioactive proteins that support immune function and growth. Traditional thermal pasteurization (72°C for >15 s) ensures microbial safety but degrades heat-sensitive proteins. High-pressure processing (HPP) offers a nonthermal alternative for microbial reduction, yet its effect on protein structure, particularly under applications of multiple pressure cycles, remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of single- and dual-cycle HPP treatments for bacterial inactivation and protein preservation in whole bovine milk and to compare these results with the industry standard-high-temperature, short-time (HTST) processing. Raw bovine milk samples were inoculated with vegetative pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus) or spores (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis) and treated with varying HPP conditions (350-600 MPa; 4-12 min, at 30°C, for single or dual cycles). Microbial reduction was assessed by standard plate count. Whey protein retention (lactoferrin [LF], IgA, IgG, IgM) was quantified using ELISA and compared with HTST and raw milk controls. Dual-cycle HPP treatments significantly enhanced bacterial reduction compared with single-cycle time equivalents for S. aureus and B. subtilis, but not for L. monocytogenes or B. cereus. Treatments for S. aureus demonstrated 0.6 to 2.5 log reduction increases from single to dual cycles at pressures of 350 to 600 MPa. Although no tested treatments achieved >5-log reductions in sporulated B. subtilis, dual-cycles increased reductions by 1.2 log compared with single-cycle time equivalents. Several conditions achieved >5-log reductions for vegetative pathogens, including 600 MPa, 12 min, single cycle; 550 and 600 MPa, 4 min dual cycle, and 550 and 600 MPa, 6 min, dual-cycle. However, all HPP treatments led to substantial degradation of immunological proteins, particularly LF (53%-84% reduction), IgA (86%-95% reduction), and IgM (81%-98% reduction), with protein retention decreasing as pressure and cycle time increased. High-temperature, short-time processing preserved higher levels of native protein structure across all treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bovine milk is a nutritionally rich fluid containing bioactive proteins that support immune function and growth. Traditional thermal pasteurization (72°C for >15 s) ensures microbial safety but degrades heat-sensitive proteins. High-pressure processing (HPP) offers a nonthermal alternative for microbial reduction, yet its effect on protein structure, particularly under applications of multiple pressure cycles, remains underexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of single- and dual-cycle HPP treatments for bacterial inactivation and protein preservation in whole bovine milk and to compare these results with the industry standard-high-temperature, short-time (HTST) processing. Raw bovine milk samples were inoculated with vegetative pathogens (Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus) or spores (Bacillus cereus, Bacillus subtilis) and treated with varying HPP conditions (350-600 MPa; 4-12 min, at 30°C, for single or dual cycles). Microbial reduction was assessed by standard plate count. Whey protein retention (lactoferrin [LF], IgA, IgG, IgM) was quantified using ELISA and compared with HTST and raw milk controls. Dual-cycle HPP treatments significantly enhanced bacterial reduction compared with single-cycle time equivalents for S. aureus and B. subtilis, but not for L. monocytogenes or B. cereus. Treatments for S. aureus demonstrated 0.6 to 2.5 log reduction increases from single to dual cycles at pressures of 350 to 600 MPa. Although no tested treatments achieved >5-log reductions in sporulated B. subtilis, dual-cycles increased reductions by 1.2 log compared with single-cycle time equivalents. Several conditions achieved >5-log reductions for vegetative pathogens, including 600 MPa, 12 min, single cycle; 550 and 600 MPa, 4 min dual cycle, and 550 and 600 MPa, 6 min, dual-cycle. However, all HPP treatments led to substantial degradation of immunological proteins, particularly LF (53%-84% reduction), IgA (86%-95% reduction), and IgM (81%-98% reduction), with protein retention decreasing as pressure and cycle time increased. High-temperature, short-time processing preserved higher levels of native protein structure across all treatments.

单、双循环高压处理(HPP)对牛乳微生物安全性和蛋白质质量的优化。
牛奶是一种营养丰富的液体,含有支持免疫功能和生长的生物活性蛋白质。传统的热巴氏灭菌法(72°C,持续15秒)确保微生物安全,但会降解热敏蛋白。高压处理(HPP)为微生物还原提供了一种非热替代方法,但其对蛋白质结构的影响,特别是在多次压力循环的应用下,仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评价单、双循环HPP处理对全牛乳细菌灭活和蛋白质保存的效果,并将这些结果与行业标准的高温短时处理(HTST)进行比较。将生牛乳样品接种营养致病菌(单核增生李斯特菌、金黄色葡萄球菌)或孢子(蜡样芽孢杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌),并在不同的HPP条件下处理(350-600 MPa; 4-12 min, 30℃,单周期或双周期)。通过标准平板计数评估微生物减量。采用ELISA定量测定乳清蛋白滞留(乳铁蛋白[LF]、IgA、IgG、IgM),并与HTST和原料乳对照组进行比较。与单周期相比,双循环HPP处理显著提高了金黄色葡萄球菌和枯草芽孢杆菌的细菌减少量,但对单核细胞增生乳杆菌和蜡样芽孢杆菌没有效果。金黄色葡萄球菌的治疗显示,在350至600兆帕的压力下,从单周期到双周期减少0.6至2.5 log。虽然没有试验处理达到5-log减少芽孢枯草芽孢杆菌,但与单周期时间当量相比,双周期增加了1.2 log减少。在几种条件下,对营养性病原体的抑制达到了50 -log,包括600 MPa, 12分钟,单循环;550和600 MPa, 4分钟双循环,550和600 MPa, 6分钟,双循环。然而,所有HPP处理都导致免疫蛋白的大量降解,特别是LF(减少53%-84%),IgA(减少86%-95%)和IgM(减少81%-98%),随着压力和循环时间的增加,蛋白质保留率下降。高温、短时间的处理在所有处理中都保留了较高水平的天然蛋白质结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Science
Journal of Dairy Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
17.10%
发文量
784
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信