{"title":"The plurality of English in Global Englishes","authors":"Yachao Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101253"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374325000785","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This response to Christine Tardy’s paper affirms the value of Global Englishes (GE) and Global Englishes Language Teaching (GELT) for multilingual writing while arguing that effective implementation requires an explicit ideological stance on English plurality within GE. Drawing on frameworks between World Englishes (WE) and translingualism, and on the homogenizing tendencies of GenAI, this response paper contends that teachers need guidance for when to preserve, adapt, or normalize linguistic features. Building on Tardy’s “why” and “what,” this paper focuses on “how”: calling for clarifying English plurality within GE to inform instruction, assessment, and calibrated GenAI use, thereby fostering inclusive, rhetorically responsive, and transparent classroom ecologies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.