The role of shared suction anchors for mitigating cascading failure in floating offshore wind farms

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Wenjun Lu , Dongting Cai , Jinhui Li , Aiting Wang
{"title":"The role of shared suction anchors for mitigating cascading failure in floating offshore wind farms","authors":"Wenjun Lu ,&nbsp;Dongting Cai ,&nbsp;Jinhui Li ,&nbsp;Aiting Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared anchors offer significant potential for reducing mooring costs and enhancing floating wind competitiveness, yet industry adoption remains hindered by cascading failure risks in multi-anchor configurations. Critical research gaps persist regarding the initiation mechanisms, propagation dynamics, and mitigation strategies for such failures in shared-anchor floating wind farms. This study addresses these gaps through a novel systematic methodology that derives shared suction anchor loading conditions using inverted catenary theory. Contrary to conventional assumptions, the analysis reveals that multi-line suction anchors exhibit no mechanical superiority over conventional foundations. Instead, they demonstrate less rational force distribution and greater failure susceptibility under environmental loading. Following initial anchor failure, platform displacement in shared-anchor wind farm decreases by 80% relative to conventional floating wind farms using strengthened chains, but the peak tension rises to 1.25 times owing to the dynamic amplification effect. Although variations in soil capacity affect mooring chain inclination angles, 3-line anchors remain most prone to initial failure across all soil conditions. After the initial failure of adjacent anchors, the susceptibility to secondary failure of 3-line anchors markedly decreases in stiffer soils. To prevent cascading failures, suction anchor designs must satisfy dual safety criteria: withstand intact-system loads and accommodate post-initial-failure amplified secondary anchor loads.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55217,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Geotechnics","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 107655"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266352X25006044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shared anchors offer significant potential for reducing mooring costs and enhancing floating wind competitiveness, yet industry adoption remains hindered by cascading failure risks in multi-anchor configurations. Critical research gaps persist regarding the initiation mechanisms, propagation dynamics, and mitigation strategies for such failures in shared-anchor floating wind farms. This study addresses these gaps through a novel systematic methodology that derives shared suction anchor loading conditions using inverted catenary theory. Contrary to conventional assumptions, the analysis reveals that multi-line suction anchors exhibit no mechanical superiority over conventional foundations. Instead, they demonstrate less rational force distribution and greater failure susceptibility under environmental loading. Following initial anchor failure, platform displacement in shared-anchor wind farm decreases by 80% relative to conventional floating wind farms using strengthened chains, but the peak tension rises to 1.25 times owing to the dynamic amplification effect. Although variations in soil capacity affect mooring chain inclination angles, 3-line anchors remain most prone to initial failure across all soil conditions. After the initial failure of adjacent anchors, the susceptibility to secondary failure of 3-line anchors markedly decreases in stiffer soils. To prevent cascading failures, suction anchor designs must satisfy dual safety criteria: withstand intact-system loads and accommodate post-initial-failure amplified secondary anchor loads.
共享吸力锚在减轻海上浮式风电场级联故障中的作用
共享锚提供了降低系泊成本和提高浮式风竞争力的巨大潜力,但多锚配置的级联故障风险仍然阻碍了行业的采用。在共享锚式浮式风电场中,关于此类故障的启动机制、传播动力学和缓解策略的关键研究差距仍然存在。本研究通过一种新颖的系统方法解决了这些差距,该方法利用倒悬链线理论推导出共享吸力锚加载条件。与传统的假设相反,分析表明,多线吸力锚没有表现出优于传统基础的力学优势。相反,它们在环境载荷下表现出较不合理的力分布和较大的破坏易感性。初始锚杆失效后,共享锚杆风电场的平台位移比使用强化锚链的传统浮式风电场减少了80%,但由于动力放大效应,峰值张力上升到1.25倍。虽然土壤容量的变化会影响锚链倾角,但在所有土壤条件下,3线锚杆最容易发生初始破坏。在较硬的土体中,相邻锚杆初始破坏后,3线锚杆对二次破坏的敏感性显著降低。为了防止级联故障,吸力锚设计必须满足双重安全标准:承受完整的系统载荷,并适应初始故障后放大的二次锚载荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers and Geotechnics
Computers and Geotechnics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
15.10%
发文量
438
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The use of computers is firmly established in geotechnical engineering and continues to grow rapidly in both engineering practice and academe. The development of advanced numerical techniques and constitutive modeling, in conjunction with rapid developments in computer hardware, enables problems to be tackled that were unthinkable even a few years ago. Computers and Geotechnics provides an up-to-date reference for engineers and researchers engaged in computer aided analysis and research in geotechnical engineering. The journal is intended for an expeditious dissemination of advanced computer applications across a broad range of geotechnical topics. Contributions on advances in numerical algorithms, computer implementation of new constitutive models and probabilistic methods are especially encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信